G. M. Pereira, L. G. O. Brito, Nina Ledger, C. Juliato, Claudine Domoney, Rufus Cartwright
{"title":"Associated factors of vaginal laxity and female sexual function: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"G. M. Pereira, L. G. O. Brito, Nina Ledger, C. Juliato, Claudine Domoney, Rufus Cartwright","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFemale sexual dysfunction (FSD), including vaginal laxity (VL), can lead to a decrease in quality of life and affect partner relationships.\n\n\nAIM\nWe aimed to investigate the associated factors of VL and FSD and their relationship with other pelvic floor disorders in a female population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis cross-sectional study was conducted at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital from July to December 2022. All women referred to clinical care at the urogynecology clinic were included. Participants were assessed according to sociodemographic and clinical aspects, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, sexual function, VL, sexual attitudes, sexual distress, sexual quality of life, vaginal symptoms, and pelvic floor disorders. Unadjusted and adjusted associated factors of VL and FSD were analyzed.\n\n\nOUTCOMES\nThe primary outcome was the identification of the associated factors of VL and FSD in a female population, and secondary outcomes included the association between VL and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with the questionnaire scores.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong participants (N = 300), vaginal delivery, multiparity, perineal laceration, menopause, and gel hormone were significantly more frequent in those reporting VL (all P < .05). When compared with nulliparity, primiparity and multiparity increased the odds of VL by approximately 4 and 12 times, respectively (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.26 [95% CI, 2.05-8.85]; OR, 12.77 [95% CI, 6.53-24.96]). Menopause and perineal laceration increased the odds of VL by 4 and 6 times (unadjusted OR, 4.65 [95% CI, 2.73-7.93]; OR, 6.13 [95% CI, 3.58-10.49]). In multivariate analysis, menopause, primiparity, multiparity, and POP remained associated with VL.\n\n\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\nParity, as an obstetric factor, and menopause and staging of POP, as clinical factors, were associated with VL.\n\n\nSTRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS\nThe investigation of associated factors for VL will contribute to the understanding of its pathophysiology. The study design makes it impossible to carry out causal inference.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nMenopause, primiparity, multiparity, and POP were highly associated with VL complaints in multivariate analysis.","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Female sexual dysfunction (FSD), including vaginal laxity (VL), can lead to a decrease in quality of life and affect partner relationships.
AIM
We aimed to investigate the associated factors of VL and FSD and their relationship with other pelvic floor disorders in a female population.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital from July to December 2022. All women referred to clinical care at the urogynecology clinic were included. Participants were assessed according to sociodemographic and clinical aspects, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, sexual function, VL, sexual attitudes, sexual distress, sexual quality of life, vaginal symptoms, and pelvic floor disorders. Unadjusted and adjusted associated factors of VL and FSD were analyzed.
OUTCOMES
The primary outcome was the identification of the associated factors of VL and FSD in a female population, and secondary outcomes included the association between VL and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with the questionnaire scores.
RESULTS
Among participants (N = 300), vaginal delivery, multiparity, perineal laceration, menopause, and gel hormone were significantly more frequent in those reporting VL (all P < .05). When compared with nulliparity, primiparity and multiparity increased the odds of VL by approximately 4 and 12 times, respectively (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.26 [95% CI, 2.05-8.85]; OR, 12.77 [95% CI, 6.53-24.96]). Menopause and perineal laceration increased the odds of VL by 4 and 6 times (unadjusted OR, 4.65 [95% CI, 2.73-7.93]; OR, 6.13 [95% CI, 3.58-10.49]). In multivariate analysis, menopause, primiparity, multiparity, and POP remained associated with VL.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Parity, as an obstetric factor, and menopause and staging of POP, as clinical factors, were associated with VL.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS
The investigation of associated factors for VL will contribute to the understanding of its pathophysiology. The study design makes it impossible to carry out causal inference.
CONCLUSION
Menopause, primiparity, multiparity, and POP were highly associated with VL complaints in multivariate analysis.
AIMWe aimed to investigate the associated factors of VL and FSD and their relationship with other pelvic floor disorders in a female population.METHODSThis cross-sectional study was conducted at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital from July to December 2022.这项横断面研究于 2022 年 7 月至 12 月在切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院进行。所有转诊至泌尿妇科诊所接受临床治疗的女性均被纳入研究范围。研究人员根据社会人口学和临床方面、盆腔器官脱垂定量系统、性功能、VL、性态度、性困扰、性生活质量、阴道症状和盆底障碍对参与者进行了评估。结果在参与者(N = 300)中,阴道分娩、多胎妊娠、会阴裂伤、绝经和凝胶激素在报告 VL 者中的发生率明显更高(所有 P < .05)。与无阴道分娩相比,初产妇和多产妇发生 VL 的几率分别增加了约 4 倍和 12 倍(未调整的几率比 [OR],4.26 [95% CI,2.05-8.85];OR,12.77 [95% CI,6.53-24.96])。绝经和会阴裂伤使 VL 的几率分别增加了 4 倍和 6 倍(未调整 OR,4.65 [95% CI,2.73-7.93];OR,6.13 [95% CI,3.58-10.49])。在多变量分析中,绝经、初产妇、多胎妊娠和 POP 仍与 VL 相关。结论在多变量分析中,绝经、初产妇、多产妇和 POP 与 VL 主诉高度相关。