The perception of ageism from the perspective of different professions

A. Hudáková, Ľ. Majerníková, A. Obročníková
{"title":"The perception of ageism from the perspective of different professions","authors":"A. Hudáková, Ľ. Majerníková, A. Obročníková","doi":"10.2478/pielxxiw-2024-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Aim. The aim of the study was to compare the differences between young people’s perceptions of ageism in terms of professions: helping professions and non-helping professions.\n \n Material and methods. We collected data by the Fraboni Ageism Scale. Cronbach α represented a value of 0.87. We performed statistical processing in SPSS 25.0 and used the t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient. The data collection of the entire research sample lasted from December 2020 to March 2021. Our final research group consisted of 262 respondents (HP and NHP). The selection criteria were the consent of each respondent, affiliation to the faculty and the age limit of 18 years and over.\n \n Results. HP are more inclined to help others and elderly. They have a greater degree of tolerance for older adults than NHP, which is confirmed by our results (the D2: Behavior attitudes; p=0.000 and in the D3: Affective attitudes; p=0.000)).\n \n Conclusions. For university students in preparation for their future profession, we can fundamentally influence their cognitive, affective and behavioral components of the perception of seniors. For these reasons, the evaluation of the perception of stereotypes (D1), separation (D2) and affective attitudes (D3) among students of different fields was important.","PeriodicalId":326203,"journal":{"name":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2024-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to compare the differences between young people’s perceptions of ageism in terms of professions: helping professions and non-helping professions. Material and methods. We collected data by the Fraboni Ageism Scale. Cronbach α represented a value of 0.87. We performed statistical processing in SPSS 25.0 and used the t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient. The data collection of the entire research sample lasted from December 2020 to March 2021. Our final research group consisted of 262 respondents (HP and NHP). The selection criteria were the consent of each respondent, affiliation to the faculty and the age limit of 18 years and over. Results. HP are more inclined to help others and elderly. They have a greater degree of tolerance for older adults than NHP, which is confirmed by our results (the D2: Behavior attitudes; p=0.000 and in the D3: Affective attitudes; p=0.000)). Conclusions. For university students in preparation for their future profession, we can fundamentally influence their cognitive, affective and behavioral components of the perception of seniors. For these reasons, the evaluation of the perception of stereotypes (D1), separation (D2) and affective attitudes (D3) among students of different fields was important.
从不同职业的角度看老龄歧视问题
研究目的本研究旨在比较不同职业(助人职业和非助人职业)的年轻人对年龄歧视看法的差异。 材料和方法。我们通过弗拉博尼老龄歧视量表收集数据。Cronbach α 值为 0.87。我们在 SPSS 25.0 中进行了统计处理,并使用了 t 检验和皮尔逊相关系数。整个研究样本的数据收集工作从 2020 年 12 月持续到 2021 年 3 月。我们的最终研究小组由 262 名受访者(HP 和 NHP)组成。选择标准是每位受访者同意、所属院系和年龄限制在 18 岁及以上。 调查结果显示HP 更倾向于帮助他人和老人。他们对老年人的宽容程度高于非高龄者,这一点在我们的结果中得到了证实(D2:行为态度;p=0.000;D3:情感态度;p=0.000):情感态度;p=0.000))。 结论对于准备从事未来职业的大学生来说,我们可以从根本上影响他们对老年人的认知、情感和行为。因此,对不同专业学生的刻板印象(D1)、分离(D2)和情感态度(D3)进行评估非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信