Love Letters From the Future

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
EXTRAPOLATION Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.3828/extr.2024.7
Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock
{"title":"Love Letters From the Future","authors":"Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock","doi":"10.3828/extr.2024.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of salvaged objects in post-apocalyptic narratives has primarily been addressed in relation to Evan Calder Williams’s concept of “salvagepunk”—a repurposing of objects in an idiosyncratic way that Williams sees as a form of capitalist critique. Such a reading, however, accommodates neither the frequent emphasis on the novelty or sublimity of such objects, nor their tendency to collapse into nostalgia and ultimately capitalist reification. Far more often than not, the break between pre-apocalyptic past and post-apocalyptic narrative present is less a profound rupture opening up the possibility of a reimagined Utopian future based on reconfigured social relations, and more an inconvenient and lamentable fissure that will eventually be bridged. Attending to a variety of primary texts such as Emily St. John Mandel’s\n Station Eleven\n (2014), David Macauley’s\n Motel of the Mysteries\n (1978), and Ruben Fleischer’s film,\n Zombieland: Double Tap\n (2019), this essay considers the ways in which salvaged items in post-apocalyptic narratives end up reaffirming the present status quo, once again proving the oft-cited maxim that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than an end to capitalism.\n","PeriodicalId":42992,"journal":{"name":"EXTRAPOLATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXTRAPOLATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of salvaged objects in post-apocalyptic narratives has primarily been addressed in relation to Evan Calder Williams’s concept of “salvagepunk”—a repurposing of objects in an idiosyncratic way that Williams sees as a form of capitalist critique. Such a reading, however, accommodates neither the frequent emphasis on the novelty or sublimity of such objects, nor their tendency to collapse into nostalgia and ultimately capitalist reification. Far more often than not, the break between pre-apocalyptic past and post-apocalyptic narrative present is less a profound rupture opening up the possibility of a reimagined Utopian future based on reconfigured social relations, and more an inconvenient and lamentable fissure that will eventually be bridged. Attending to a variety of primary texts such as Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven (2014), David Macauley’s Motel of the Mysteries (1978), and Ruben Fleischer’s film, Zombieland: Double Tap (2019), this essay considers the ways in which salvaged items in post-apocalyptic narratives end up reaffirming the present status quo, once again proving the oft-cited maxim that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than an end to capitalism.
来自未来的情书
在末世叙事中使用打捞物品,主要是根据埃文-考尔德-威廉姆斯(Evan Calder Williams)的 "打捞朋克"(salvagepunk)概念--威廉姆斯认为这是一种资本主义批判形式--以特立独行的方式重新利用物品。然而,这样的解读既没有考虑到此类物品经常被强调的新颖性或崇高性,也没有考虑到它们容易陷入怀旧并最终被资本主义重新整合的倾向。在更多情况下,末世前的过去与末世后的现在之间的断裂,与其说是一种深刻的断裂,开启了在重构的社会关系基础上重新想象乌托邦未来的可能性,不如说是一种最终将被弥合的不便和可悲的裂痕。本文关注各种主要文本,如艾米莉-圣约翰-曼德尔的《十一号车站》(2014)、大卫-澳门利的《神秘汽车旅馆》(1978)和鲁本-弗莱舍的电影《僵尸之地》:这篇文章探讨了末世叙事中的打捞物品如何最终重申了目前的现状,再次证明了人们经常引用的格言:想象世界末日比想象资本主义的终结更容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EXTRAPOLATION
EXTRAPOLATION LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信