Positive Strategies in Corporate Sustainability Reports

N. Nesova
{"title":"Positive Strategies in Corporate Sustainability Reports","authors":"N. Nesova","doi":"10.12737/2306-1731-2024-13-1-30-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the paradoxical discourse of sustainability reporting, which is characterized by significant costs associated with sustainable practices yet lacks direct economic benefit from such investments. The paper aims to resolve this paradox through a linguistic lens and seeks to understand the motivations behind the publication of sustainability reports. The primary value of the study lies in assessing the role of these reports within corporate communication: whether they genuinely and objectively provide information on sustainability or are more akin to tools of public relations and marketing. The article tests this assumption by analyzing the use of optimistic linguistic strategies in corporate sustainability reports compared to other types of official documentation. The research underscores the importance of establishing unified standards for sustainability reporting, which could lead to greater transparency within corporations.","PeriodicalId":432786,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-1731-2024-13-1-30-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the paradoxical discourse of sustainability reporting, which is characterized by significant costs associated with sustainable practices yet lacks direct economic benefit from such investments. The paper aims to resolve this paradox through a linguistic lens and seeks to understand the motivations behind the publication of sustainability reports. The primary value of the study lies in assessing the role of these reports within corporate communication: whether they genuinely and objectively provide information on sustainability or are more akin to tools of public relations and marketing. The article tests this assumption by analyzing the use of optimistic linguistic strategies in corporate sustainability reports compared to other types of official documentation. The research underscores the importance of establishing unified standards for sustainability reporting, which could lead to greater transparency within corporations.
企业可持续发展报告中的积极战略
本文探讨了可持续发展报告的悖论,其特点是与可持续发展实践相关的成本巨大,但却缺乏此类投资的直接经济效益。本文旨在通过语言学视角来解决这一悖论,并试图了解发布可持续发展报告背后的动机。研究的主要价值在于评估这些报告在企业沟通中的作用:它们是真正客观地提供可持续发展信息,还是更类似于公共关系和营销工具。文章通过分析与其他类型的官方文件相比,企业可持续发展报告中乐观语言策略的使用情况来验证这一假设。研究强调了为可持续发展报告制定统一标准的重要性,这可以提高企业内部的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信