The Study of Components Technology Leadership of Teachers in Public Art Education Management Take Nanning, Guangxi

Abstract

The objectives of this article were: 1) to investigate the components and indicators of Technology Leadership of Teachers in Public Art Education Management in Nanning; 2) to examine the current conditions, desired conditions, and the necessity for developing Technology Leadership of Teachers in Public Art Education Management in Nanning; and 3) to explore guidelines for fostering Technology Leadership of Teachers in Public Art Education Management in Nanning, Guangxi. The research sample comprised 7 participants. The study was divided into three steps: Step 1 involved examining the components and indicators, with qualified individuals evaluating their suitability. Step 2 entailed investigating the current situation using a multi-stage sampling method, with a sample group of 263 individuals. Step 3 focused on exploring guidelines for developing technology leadership among teachers, utilizing data from 6 individuals. Research tools included questionnaires, interviews, and assessments. Statistical analysis methods such as mean, standard deviation, and the analysis of necessary conditions (PNI modified) were employed for data interpretation. The research findings revealed that: 1) the components and indicators of technology leadership among teachers in educational management comprised 4 components and 40 indicators, namely: Technological vision with 10 indicators, Technological competence with 10 indicators, Technology professional development with 10 indicators, and Technology integration with 10 indicators, rated as highly appropriate overall. 2) The necessary requirements for developing technology leadership among teachers in educational management suggested the need for development across all components. 3) The guidelines for fostering technology leadership among teachers in educational management encompassed a total of 13 development strategies. The assessment of these strategies indicated a high level of appropriateness and feasibility.