Anxiety and Depression Prevalence in Free Clinic Patients

Jack Kovarik, Macie Bokelman, Margaret Smith
{"title":"Anxiety and Depression Prevalence in Free Clinic Patients","authors":"Jack Kovarik, Macie Bokelman, Margaret Smith","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Disparities in mental health services are often observed in under-resourced low-income communities, which are at an increased risk for compromised mental health. By surveying patients at JayDoc Free Clinic, a student-run free clinic (SRFC) in Kansas City, Kansas, this study sought to as-sess the prevalence of depression and anxiety and compare screening outcomes among various de-mographic groups seeking safety-net care.Methods: From May through November 2022, patients aged 12 and older were offered a Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and demographic survey. Demo-graphic variables included household income, gender, insurance status, and race and ethnicity. GAD-7 and PHQ-9 questionnaire scores were categorized into minimal, mild, moderate, or severe catego-ries. Relationships between demographic variables and scores on screening questionnaires were an-alyzed using multivariable analyses, with linear regression and analysis of variance one-way tests for significance (p-value <0.05).Results: Of 232 participants who consented to the study, 222 completed the GAD-7 and 228 com-pleted the PHQ-9. In comparison to 2019 United States national data, the percentage of respondents experiencing anxiety and depression was greater across all severity classifications. Approximately 18.1% reported symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety and 21.5% reported symptoms of moderate to severe depression, compared to national distributions of 6.1% and 7%, respectively. Of 232 participants, 54 completed the demographic survey. There was no correlation between PHQ-9 scores or GAD-7 scores and gender, household income, insurance status.Conclusion: While no association was identified between screening outcomes and demographic var-iables, the findings that the prevalence of anxiety and depression at JayDoc SRFC is greater than na-tional rates reaffirm the need for accessible mental health services for patients receiving care at SRFCs. This study provides insight into the status of mental health in an SRFC patient population and discusses mental health screening implementation at SRFCs.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":"222 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v10i1.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in mental health services are often observed in under-resourced low-income communities, which are at an increased risk for compromised mental health. By surveying patients at JayDoc Free Clinic, a student-run free clinic (SRFC) in Kansas City, Kansas, this study sought to as-sess the prevalence of depression and anxiety and compare screening outcomes among various de-mographic groups seeking safety-net care.Methods: From May through November 2022, patients aged 12 and older were offered a Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and demographic survey. Demo-graphic variables included household income, gender, insurance status, and race and ethnicity. GAD-7 and PHQ-9 questionnaire scores were categorized into minimal, mild, moderate, or severe catego-ries. Relationships between demographic variables and scores on screening questionnaires were an-alyzed using multivariable analyses, with linear regression and analysis of variance one-way tests for significance (p-value <0.05).Results: Of 232 participants who consented to the study, 222 completed the GAD-7 and 228 com-pleted the PHQ-9. In comparison to 2019 United States national data, the percentage of respondents experiencing anxiety and depression was greater across all severity classifications. Approximately 18.1% reported symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety and 21.5% reported symptoms of moderate to severe depression, compared to national distributions of 6.1% and 7%, respectively. Of 232 participants, 54 completed the demographic survey. There was no correlation between PHQ-9 scores or GAD-7 scores and gender, household income, insurance status.Conclusion: While no association was identified between screening outcomes and demographic var-iables, the findings that the prevalence of anxiety and depression at JayDoc SRFC is greater than na-tional rates reaffirm the need for accessible mental health services for patients receiving care at SRFCs. This study provides insight into the status of mental health in an SRFC patient population and discusses mental health screening implementation at SRFCs.
免费诊所患者的焦虑症和抑郁症患病率
背景:在资源匮乏的低收入社区,心理健康服务的差距经常被观察到,而这些社区的心理健康受到损害的风险更高。本研究通过调查堪萨斯州堪萨斯城由学生经营的免费诊所 JayDoc Free Clinic(SRFC)的患者,试图评估抑郁症和焦虑症的患病率,并比较寻求安全网医疗服务的不同人口统计群体的筛查结果:从 2022 年 5 月到 11 月,为 12 岁及以上的患者提供了广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和人口统计学调查。人口统计学变量包括家庭收入、性别、保险状况、种族和民族。GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 问卷得分分为最低、轻度、中度和重度四类。人口统计学变量与筛查问卷得分之间的关系采用多变量分析、线性回归和方差分析进行显著性单向检验(P 值小于 0.05):在同意参与研究的 232 名参与者中,222 人完成了 GAD-7 测试,228 人完成了 PHQ-9 测试。与 2019 年美国全国数据相比,在所有严重程度分类中,出现焦虑和抑郁症状的受访者比例都更高。约 18.1% 的受访者报告了中度至重度焦虑症状,21.5% 的受访者报告了中度至重度抑郁症状,而全国的这一比例分别为 6.1% 和 7%。在 232 名参与者中,有 54 人完成了人口统计学调查。PHQ-9得分或GAD-7得分与性别、家庭收入、保险状况之间没有相关性:虽然未发现筛查结果与人口统计学变量之间存在关联,但 JayDoc SRFC 的焦虑症和抑郁症患病率高于全国水平的调查结果再次证明,在 SRFC 接受治疗的患者需要获得心理健康服务。本研究深入探讨了 SRFC 患者群体的心理健康状况,并讨论了 SRFC 心理健康筛查的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信