Healthcare professionals’ job motivation in a federal hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional study

Q3 Medicine
Bezawit Woldaregay Wagaye, T. Leulseged, Mebratu Abera Gurara, Betelhem Tiruneh Gebremedhin, Yared Adane Minas, Yonas H Gebeyehu, Zekarias Tadele Alemneh, Thomas Tadesse Meshesha, Nathnael Tesfa Lisanu, S. W. Beza
{"title":"Healthcare professionals’ job motivation in a federal hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional study","authors":"Bezawit Woldaregay Wagaye, T. Leulseged, Mebratu Abera Gurara, Betelhem Tiruneh Gebremedhin, Yared Adane Minas, Yonas H Gebeyehu, Zekarias Tadele Alemneh, Thomas Tadesse Meshesha, Nathnael Tesfa Lisanu, S. W. Beza","doi":"10.4314/emj.v62i2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Healthcare professional motivation is crucial for delivering high-quality healthcare in any setting. However, low motivation is a significant challenge in developing countries like Ethiopia, where workforce shortages and a weak healthcare system strain to handle an increasing patient flow.This study aimed to assess the motivation levels and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at ALERT Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2022 among 293 healthcare professionals. Participants were selected from the pool of permanent hospital employees who were actively working at the time of the study. Data were collected using a pre-tested, structured, self-administered questionnaire. Motivation level was assessed using 23 questions under 7 constructs that are measured on a five-point likert scale and finally reported as a standardized percentage of scale maximum (% SM). To identify factors associated with motivation level, a multiple linear regression analysis was run at 5% level of significance, where regression coefficient (β) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to interpret significant results.Results: The participants' job motivation level was 41.6% (95%CI: 39.8-43.6%). Being a doctor was associated with a significantly lower level of motivation than nurses (β=-7.94, 95%CI=-11.80, -4.07, p<0.001). On the other hand, significantly high motivation levels were associated with having a managerial role (β=3.95, 95% CI=0.74,7.15, p=0.016), availability of adequate resources for effective work performance (β=2.77, 95% CI=1.27,4.27, p<0.0001), and low practice of subjective performance appraisal system (β=2.41, 95%CI=1.02,3.79, p=0.001).Conclusion: The healthcare professionals' level of motivation was moderate. Designing interventions to minimize workload, and improve decision making power, resources availability, and performance appraisal system is crucial. Further multi-center study using a mixed-methods design is essential to gain an in-depth understanding and reach a more generalizable finding.","PeriodicalId":11937,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/emj.v62i2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare professional motivation is crucial for delivering high-quality healthcare in any setting. However, low motivation is a significant challenge in developing countries like Ethiopia, where workforce shortages and a weak healthcare system strain to handle an increasing patient flow.This study aimed to assess the motivation levels and associated factors among healthcare professionals working at ALERT Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2022 among 293 healthcare professionals. Participants were selected from the pool of permanent hospital employees who were actively working at the time of the study. Data were collected using a pre-tested, structured, self-administered questionnaire. Motivation level was assessed using 23 questions under 7 constructs that are measured on a five-point likert scale and finally reported as a standardized percentage of scale maximum (% SM). To identify factors associated with motivation level, a multiple linear regression analysis was run at 5% level of significance, where regression coefficient (β) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to interpret significant results.Results: The participants' job motivation level was 41.6% (95%CI: 39.8-43.6%). Being a doctor was associated with a significantly lower level of motivation than nurses (β=-7.94, 95%CI=-11.80, -4.07, p<0.001). On the other hand, significantly high motivation levels were associated with having a managerial role (β=3.95, 95% CI=0.74,7.15, p=0.016), availability of adequate resources for effective work performance (β=2.77, 95% CI=1.27,4.27, p<0.0001), and low practice of subjective performance appraisal system (β=2.41, 95%CI=1.02,3.79, p=0.001).Conclusion: The healthcare professionals' level of motivation was moderate. Designing interventions to minimize workload, and improve decision making power, resources availability, and performance appraisal system is crucial. Further multi-center study using a mixed-methods design is essential to gain an in-depth understanding and reach a more generalizable finding.
埃塞俄比亚一家联邦医院医护人员的工作动机:横断面研究
背景:医护人员的积极性对于在任何环境下提供高质量的医疗服务都至关重要。本研究旨在评估在埃塞俄比亚 ALERT 综合专科医院工作的医护人员的积极性水平及相关因素:2022年5月至6月,对293名医护人员进行了横断面研究。研究对象从研究时正在工作的医院正式员工中选取。数据收集采用了预先测试的结构化自填问卷。激励水平是通过 7 个结构下的 23 个问题进行评估的,这些问题采用五点李克特量表进行测量,最后以量表最大值的标准化百分比(% SM)进行报告。为了确定与工作动机水平相关的因素,我们在 5%的显著性水平上进行了多元线性回归分析,回归系数(β)和 95%的置信区间(CI)用于解释显著结果:结果:参与者的工作动机水平为 41.6%(95%CI:39.8-43.6%)。医生的工作积极性明显低于护士(β=-7.94,95%CI=-11.80,-4.07,p<0.001)。另一方面,较高的积极性水平与以下因素相关:担任管理职务(β=3.95,95%CI=0.74,7.15,p=0.016)、拥有充足的资源以实现有效的工作绩效(β=2.77,95%CI=1.27,4.27,p<0.0001)以及较少采用主观绩效考核制度(β=2.41,95%CI=1.02,3.79,p=0.001):结论:医护人员的积极性处于中等水平。设计干预措施以最大限度地减轻工作量、提高决策能力、资源可用性和绩效考核制度至关重要。为了深入了解研究结果并使其更具普遍性,采用混合方法设计进一步开展多中心研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Medical Journal
Ethiopian Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Ethiopian Medical Journal (EMJ) is the official Journal of the Ethiopian Medical Association (EMA) and devoted to the advancement and dissemination of knowledge pertaining to the broad field of medicine in Ethiopia and other developing countries. Prospective contributors to the Journal should take note of the instructions of Manuscript preparation and submission to EMJ as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信