Remote Rhythm Monitoring using a Photoplethysmography Smartphone Application after Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

P. Calvert, Mark T. Mills, Kelly Howarth, Sini Aykara, Lindsay Lunt, Helen Brewer, David Green, Janet Green, Simon Moore, Jude Almutawa, Dominik Linz, G. Lip, Derick Todd, Dhiraj Gupta
{"title":"Remote Rhythm Monitoring using a Photoplethysmography Smartphone Application after Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"P. Calvert, Mark T. Mills, Kelly Howarth, Sini Aykara, Lindsay Lunt, Helen Brewer, David Green, Janet Green, Simon Moore, Jude Almutawa, Dominik Linz, G. Lip, Derick Todd, Dhiraj Gupta","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is a commonly utilised rhythm control technique for atrial fibrillation (AF). Follow-up typically comprises a hospital visit for 12-lead ECG two weeks post-DCCV. We report the feasibility, costs and environmental benefit of remote photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring as an alternative.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively analysed DCCV cases at our centre from May 2020 to October 2022. Patients were stratified into those with remote PPG follow-up and those with traditional 12-lead ECG follow-up. Monitoring type was decided by the specialist nurse performing the DCCV at the time of the procedure after discussing with the patient and offering them both options if appropriate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients who underwent PPG monitoring, patient compliance and experience, and cost, travel and environmental impact.\n \n \n \n 416 patients underwent 461 acutely successful DCCV procedures. 246 underwent PPG follow-up whilst 214 underwent ECG follow-up. Patient compliance was high (PPG 89.4% vs ECG 89.8%; p > 0.999) and the majority of PPG users (90%) found the app easy to use. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 71.1% (PPG) and 64.7% (ECG) of patients (p = 0.161). 29 (11.8%) PPG patients subsequently required an ECG either due to non-compliance, technical failure or inconclusive PPG readings. Despite this, mean healthcare costs (£47.91 vs £135 per patient; p < 0.001) and median cost to the patient (£0 vs £5.97; p < 0.001) were lower with PPG. Median travel time per patient (0 vs 44min; p < 0.001) and CO2 emissions (0 vs 3.59kg; p < 0.001) were also lower with PPG. No safety issues were identified.\n \n \n \n Remote PPG monitoring is a viable method of assessing for arrhythmia recurrence post-DCCV. This approach may save patients significant travel time, reduce environmental CO2 emission and be cost saving in a publicly-funded healthcare system.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":"340 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is a commonly utilised rhythm control technique for atrial fibrillation (AF). Follow-up typically comprises a hospital visit for 12-lead ECG two weeks post-DCCV. We report the feasibility, costs and environmental benefit of remote photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring as an alternative. We retrospectively analysed DCCV cases at our centre from May 2020 to October 2022. Patients were stratified into those with remote PPG follow-up and those with traditional 12-lead ECG follow-up. Monitoring type was decided by the specialist nurse performing the DCCV at the time of the procedure after discussing with the patient and offering them both options if appropriate. Outcomes included the proportion of patients who underwent PPG monitoring, patient compliance and experience, and cost, travel and environmental impact. 416 patients underwent 461 acutely successful DCCV procedures. 246 underwent PPG follow-up whilst 214 underwent ECG follow-up. Patient compliance was high (PPG 89.4% vs ECG 89.8%; p > 0.999) and the majority of PPG users (90%) found the app easy to use. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 71.1% (PPG) and 64.7% (ECG) of patients (p = 0.161). 29 (11.8%) PPG patients subsequently required an ECG either due to non-compliance, technical failure or inconclusive PPG readings. Despite this, mean healthcare costs (£47.91 vs £135 per patient; p < 0.001) and median cost to the patient (£0 vs £5.97; p < 0.001) were lower with PPG. Median travel time per patient (0 vs 44min; p < 0.001) and CO2 emissions (0 vs 3.59kg; p < 0.001) were also lower with PPG. No safety issues were identified. Remote PPG monitoring is a viable method of assessing for arrhythmia recurrence post-DCCV. This approach may save patients significant travel time, reduce environmental CO2 emission and be cost saving in a publicly-funded healthcare system.
心房颤动心脏复律后使用照相血压计智能手机应用软件进行远程心律监测
直流电心律转复术(DCCV)是一种常用的心房颤动(AF)节律控制技术。随访通常包括在直流电心律转复术后两周到医院进行 12 导联心电图检查。我们报告了作为替代方法的远程光电血压监测(PPG)的可行性、成本和环境效益。 我们对本中心 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 10 月期间的 DCCV 病例进行了回顾性分析。我们将患者分为接受远程 PPG 随访的患者和接受传统 12 导联心电图随访的患者。监测类型由实施 DCCV 的专科护士在手术时与患者讨论后决定,并在合适的情况下为患者提供两种选择。结果包括接受 PPG 监测的患者比例、患者依从性和体验,以及成本、旅行和环境影响。 416 名患者接受了 461 次急性成功的 DCCV 手术。246 人接受了 PPG 随访,214 人接受了心电图随访。患者的依从性很高(PPG 89.4% 对 ECG 89.8%;P > 0.999),大多数 PPG 用户(90%)认为该应用易于使用。71.1%(PPG)和 64.7%(ECG)的患者保持了窦性心律(p = 0.161)。29(11.8%)名 PPG 患者因未遵医嘱、技术故障或 PPG 读数不确定而需要进行心电图检查。尽管如此,PPG 的平均医疗成本(每名患者 47.91 英镑 vs 135 英镑;p < 0.001)和患者成本中位数(0 英镑 vs 5.97 英镑;p < 0.001)均较低。每位患者的中位旅行时间(0 对 44 分钟;p < 0.001)和二氧化碳排放量(0 对 3.59 千克;p < 0.001)也比 PPG 低。未发现任何安全问题。 远程 PPG 监测是评估 DCCV 后心律失常复发的一种可行方法。这种方法可以为患者节省大量的旅行时间,减少二氧化碳的环境排放,并为公共医疗系统节约成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信