Focal distal esophageal dilation (blown-out myotomy) after achalasia treatment: prevalence and associated symptoms.

Thijs Kuipers, F. A. Ponds, Paul Fockens, B. Bastiaansen, J. Pandolfino, A. Bredenoord
{"title":"Focal distal esophageal dilation (blown-out myotomy) after achalasia treatment: prevalence and associated symptoms.","authors":"Thijs Kuipers, F. A. Ponds, Paul Fockens, B. Bastiaansen, J. Pandolfino, A. Bredenoord","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"METHODS\nA dataset of the locally treated patients in a randomized controlled trial comparing POEM with pneumatic dilation (PD) was analyzed. A BOM is defined as a >50% increase in esophageal diameter at its widest point in the distal esophagus between the lower esophageal sphincter and 5 cm above.\n\n\nRESULTS\n74 patients were treated in our center, 5-year follow-up data was available in 55 patients (32 (58%) patients randomized to POEM, 23 (42%) PD). In the group initially treated with POEM the incidence of BOM increased from 11.5% (4/38) at three months, 21.1% (8/38) at 1 year, 27.8% (10/36) at 2 years and 31.3% (10/32) at 5 years. None of the patients treated with PD alone developed a BOM. Patients that developed a BOM had higher total Eckardt score and Eckardt regurgitation component compared to patients that underwent POEM without BOM development (3 (2.75-3.25) vs 2 (1.75-3) p=0.032) and (1 (0.75-1 vs 0 (0-1) p=0.041). POEM patients with a BOM more often report reflux symptoms (85% (11/13) vs 46% (2/16), p=0.023) and had a higher acid exposure time ((24.5% (8-47)) vs 6% (1.2-18.7), p=0.027).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\n30% of the patients treated with POEM develop a BOM, which is associated with a higher acid exposure, more reflux symptoms and symptoms of regurgitation.","PeriodicalId":507623,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

METHODS A dataset of the locally treated patients in a randomized controlled trial comparing POEM with pneumatic dilation (PD) was analyzed. A BOM is defined as a >50% increase in esophageal diameter at its widest point in the distal esophagus between the lower esophageal sphincter and 5 cm above. RESULTS 74 patients were treated in our center, 5-year follow-up data was available in 55 patients (32 (58%) patients randomized to POEM, 23 (42%) PD). In the group initially treated with POEM the incidence of BOM increased from 11.5% (4/38) at three months, 21.1% (8/38) at 1 year, 27.8% (10/36) at 2 years and 31.3% (10/32) at 5 years. None of the patients treated with PD alone developed a BOM. Patients that developed a BOM had higher total Eckardt score and Eckardt regurgitation component compared to patients that underwent POEM without BOM development (3 (2.75-3.25) vs 2 (1.75-3) p=0.032) and (1 (0.75-1 vs 0 (0-1) p=0.041). POEM patients with a BOM more often report reflux symptoms (85% (11/13) vs 46% (2/16), p=0.023) and had a higher acid exposure time ((24.5% (8-47)) vs 6% (1.2-18.7), p=0.027). CONCLUSION 30% of the patients treated with POEM develop a BOM, which is associated with a higher acid exposure, more reflux symptoms and symptoms of regurgitation.
贲门失弛缓症治疗后食管远端局灶性扩张(爆破性肌切开术):发病率及相关症状。
方法分析了一项随机对照试验中局部治疗患者的数据集,该试验比较了 POEM 和气压扩张术 (PD)。BOM 的定义是食管下括约肌和食管上括约肌 5 厘米之间的食管远端最宽处食管直径增大 >50%。在最初接受 POEM 治疗的一组患者中,BOM 的发生率从三个月时的 11.5%(4/38)上升到一年时的 21.1%(8/38)、两年时的 27.8%(10/36)和五年时的 31.3%(10/32)。在单独接受腹膜透析治疗的患者中,没有人出现 BOM。与未发生BOM的POEM患者相比,发生BOM的患者的Eckardt总分和Eckardt反流部分更高(3 (2.75-3.25) vs 2 (1.75-3) p=0.032)和(1 (0.75-1 vs 0 (0-1) p=0.041)。有BOM的POEM患者更常出现反流症状(85%(11/13) vs 46% (2/16),p=0.023),且酸暴露时间更长((24.5% (8-47)) vs 6% (1.2-18.7),p=0.027)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信