A 3D Evaluation of Condyle Position of Skeletal Class I and III Patients: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Technique

Q3 Health Professions
Arman Saeedivahdat, Tohid Babaei, Nadereh Ariamanesh, Hadi Monzavi, Pouya Badri, Ali Nokhbeh
{"title":"A 3D Evaluation of Condyle Position of Skeletal Class I and III Patients: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Technique","authors":"Arman Saeedivahdat, Tohid Babaei, Nadereh Ariamanesh, Hadi Monzavi, Pouya Badri, Ali Nokhbeh","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aims to assess the differences in the condyle position for two skeletal classes using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) reconstructions for both sides and genders. \nMaterials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the CBCT images of 96 patients (20-60 years) were assessed. The participants were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I and III). The variables of the Anterior-Posterior position of the Condyle (APC), condylar angle in the axial plane (ACA), the Lateral Position of the Condyle in the axial plane (LPC), the Vertical Position of the Condyle (VPC), condylar angle in coronal dimension (CCA), and the difference of APC and VPC on both sides were measured. The measurements were analyzed using a one‑way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. \nResults: The variables of APC, LPC, ACA, VDC, and the difference of the APC on both sides in the two skeletal classes were similar. The VPC and CCA were greater in Class III than in Class I. All variables representing the 3D position of the condyle were similar in men and women, as well as on the right and left in both skeletal classes, I and III. \nConclusion: Based on the 3D evaluation results of the condylar position, the skeletal classes III and I differed in the VPC and CCA; however, for the rest variables, there were no statistical differences.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"38 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aims to assess the differences in the condyle position for two skeletal classes using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) reconstructions for both sides and genders. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the CBCT images of 96 patients (20-60 years) were assessed. The participants were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I and III). The variables of the Anterior-Posterior position of the Condyle (APC), condylar angle in the axial plane (ACA), the Lateral Position of the Condyle in the axial plane (LPC), the Vertical Position of the Condyle (VPC), condylar angle in coronal dimension (CCA), and the difference of APC and VPC on both sides were measured. The measurements were analyzed using a one‑way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: The variables of APC, LPC, ACA, VDC, and the difference of the APC on both sides in the two skeletal classes were similar. The VPC and CCA were greater in Class III than in Class I. All variables representing the 3D position of the condyle were similar in men and women, as well as on the right and left in both skeletal classes, I and III. Conclusion: Based on the 3D evaluation results of the condylar position, the skeletal classes III and I differed in the VPC and CCA; however, for the rest variables, there were no statistical differences.
骨骼 I 级和 III 级患者髁状突位置的 3D 评估:锥形束计算机断层扫描技术
目的:本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对两侧和两性的髁突位置进行重建,以评估两种骨骼等级的髁突位置差异。材料与方法:在这项横断面描述性研究中,对 96 名患者(20-60 岁)的 CBCT 图像进行了评估。根据患者的角度错合畸形分类(角度等级 I 和 III)对其进行了划分。测量的变量包括髁突的前后位置(APC)、髁突在轴面上的角度(ACA)、髁突在轴面上的侧面位置(LPC)、髁突的垂直位置(VPC)、髁突在冠状面上的角度(CCA)以及两侧 APC 和 VPC 的差异。测量结果采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行分析。结果两组骨骼的 APC、LPC、ACA、VDC 变量及两侧 APC 差值相似。代表髁状突三维位置的所有变量在男性和女性中,以及在骨骼等级 I 和 III 中的右侧和左侧都相似。结论根据髁状突位置的三维评估结果,骨骼III级和I级在VPC和CCA方面存在差异;但在其他变量方面,没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信