Effect of Phenobarbital-Based Alcohol Withdrawal Protocol on Provider Practice and Patient Outcomes—A Quality Improvement Study

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nicolette Centanni, Taylor Mezoian, John Gilboy, Jessica Evans, Nicole Hudak, Wendy Craig, Lesley Gordon
{"title":"Effect of Phenobarbital-Based Alcohol Withdrawal Protocol on Provider Practice and Patient Outcomes—A Quality Improvement Study","authors":"Nicolette Centanni, Taylor Mezoian, John Gilboy, Jessica Evans, Nicole Hudak, Wendy Craig, Lesley Gordon","doi":"10.1177/00185787241247716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Alcohol is the most common substance use disorder in the United States. Despite this prevalence, there remains significant heterogeneity in medical management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). While the 2020 American Society of Addition Medicine continues to recommend the use of benzodiazepines as first-line therapy for AWS, there is increasing use of phenobarbital in patients at high risk of severe AWS. Despite phenobarbital’s favorable pharmacologic profile, historically, clinical utilization on general medicine services has been low and often restricted. In this project, we have examined practice patterns and associated clinical outcomes in adult patients experiencing AWS on the general medicine service pre and post implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol for the treatment of severe AWS at our institution. Methods: This quality improvement study evaluated changes in management of AWS on general medicine units associated with implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol and order set in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our primary outcome measures were receipt of a phenobarbital loading dose, concomitant benzodiazepine administration, and total benzodiazepine dose. Safety outcomes were also explored to assess clinical impacts of this protocol implementation. The project was determined “not research” by our Institutional Review Board. Results: Phenobarbital-protocol implementation was associated with increased frequency of receiving a phenobarbital loading dose (49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001), decreased use of concomitant benzodiazepine/phenobarbital (4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001), and decreased total benzodiazepine dose (7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001). Regarding safety, there was no significant pre/post difference in the rate of ICU transfer, but among those transferred there was a trend toward decreased mechanical ventilation rate (100% vs 28.6%; P = .051), and a significantly reduced ICU length of stay (median 11 vs 3 days; P = .04). There were no pre/post differences in seizures, delirium or use of adjunct medications. Conclusions: This quality improvement study demonstrates a marked change in provider prescribing practices for treating AWS after implementation of an institutional phenobarbital-based protocol. We observed no difference in overall clinical outcomes after protocol implementation, although a larger follow-up study is needed to confirm this and to further explore the shorter ICU length of stay for patients with AWS postimplementation.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241247716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alcohol is the most common substance use disorder in the United States. Despite this prevalence, there remains significant heterogeneity in medical management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). While the 2020 American Society of Addition Medicine continues to recommend the use of benzodiazepines as first-line therapy for AWS, there is increasing use of phenobarbital in patients at high risk of severe AWS. Despite phenobarbital’s favorable pharmacologic profile, historically, clinical utilization on general medicine services has been low and often restricted. In this project, we have examined practice patterns and associated clinical outcomes in adult patients experiencing AWS on the general medicine service pre and post implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol for the treatment of severe AWS at our institution. Methods: This quality improvement study evaluated changes in management of AWS on general medicine units associated with implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol and order set in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our primary outcome measures were receipt of a phenobarbital loading dose, concomitant benzodiazepine administration, and total benzodiazepine dose. Safety outcomes were also explored to assess clinical impacts of this protocol implementation. The project was determined “not research” by our Institutional Review Board. Results: Phenobarbital-protocol implementation was associated with increased frequency of receiving a phenobarbital loading dose (49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001), decreased use of concomitant benzodiazepine/phenobarbital (4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001), and decreased total benzodiazepine dose (7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001). Regarding safety, there was no significant pre/post difference in the rate of ICU transfer, but among those transferred there was a trend toward decreased mechanical ventilation rate (100% vs 28.6%; P = .051), and a significantly reduced ICU length of stay (median 11 vs 3 days; P = .04). There were no pre/post differences in seizures, delirium or use of adjunct medications. Conclusions: This quality improvement study demonstrates a marked change in provider prescribing practices for treating AWS after implementation of an institutional phenobarbital-based protocol. We observed no difference in overall clinical outcomes after protocol implementation, although a larger follow-up study is needed to confirm this and to further explore the shorter ICU length of stay for patients with AWS postimplementation.
基于苯巴比妥的戒酒方案对医护人员实践和患者疗效的影响--质量改进研究
导言:酒精是美国最常见的药物使用障碍。尽管如此,酒精戒断综合症(AWS)的医疗管理仍然存在很大的差异。虽然 2020 年美国成瘾医学会继续推荐使用苯二氮卓类药物作为戒酒综合症的一线治疗,但苯巴比妥在严重戒酒综合症高危患者中的使用也在不断增加。尽管苯巴比妥具有良好的药理作用,但从历史上看,其在全科医学服务中的临床使用率一直很低,而且经常受到限制。在本项目中,我们研究了在本机构实施基于苯巴比妥的重症 AWS 治疗方案前后,普通内科成人 AWS 患者的诊疗模式和相关临床结果。方法:这项质量改进研究评估了实施基于苯巴比妥的方案和电子病历(EMR)中的医嘱集后,普通内科病房对 AWS 的管理发生的变化。我们的主要结果指标是接受苯巴比妥负荷剂量、同时服用苯并二氮杂卓以及苯并二氮杂卓的总剂量。我们还探讨了安全性结果,以评估该方案实施的临床影响。该项目被我们的机构审查委员会认定为 "非研究 "项目。结果苯巴比妥方案的实施增加了接受苯巴比妥负荷剂量的频率(49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001),减少了苯二氮杂卓/苯巴比妥的同时使用(4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001),减少了苯二氮杂卓的总剂量(7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001)。在安全性方面,ICU转院率前后无显著差异,但在转院患者中,机械通气率呈下降趋势(100% vs 28.6%;P = .051),ICU住院时间显著缩短(中位数11天 vs 3天;P = .04)。在癫痫发作、谵妄或辅助药物使用方面,前后没有差异。结论:这项质量改进研究表明,在实施基于苯巴比妥的机构方案后,医疗服务提供者治疗 AWS 的处方做法发生了显著变化。我们观察到协议实施后总体临床结果没有差异,但需要更大规模的随访研究来证实这一点,并进一步探讨协议实施后缩短 AWS 患者重症监护室住院时间的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信