Suggesting a holistic framework for understanding healthcare services leadership competence - a critical interpretive synthesis.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ingrid Marie Leikvoll Oskarsson, Erlend Vik
{"title":"Suggesting a holistic framework for understanding healthcare services leadership competence - a critical interpretive synthesis.","authors":"Ingrid Marie Leikvoll Oskarsson, Erlend Vik","doi":"10.1108/LHS-08-2023-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nHealthcare providers are under pressure due to increasing and more complex demands for services. Increased pressure on budgets and human resources adds to an ever-growing problem set. Competent leaders are in demand to ensure effective and well-performing healthcare organisations that deliver balanced results and high-quality services. Researchers have made significant efforts to identify and define determining competencies for healthcare leadership. Broad terms such as competence are, however, inherently at risk of becoming too generic to add analytical value. The purpose of this study is to suggest a holistic framework for understanding healthcare leadership competence, that can be crucial for operationalising important healthcare leadership competencies for researchers, decision-makers as well as practitioners.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nIn the present study, a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) was conducted to analyse competency descriptions for healthcare leaders. The descriptions were retrieved from peer reviewed empirical studies published between 2010 and 2022 that aimed to identify healthcare services leadership competencies. Grounded theory was utilised to code the data and inductively develop new categories of healthcare leadership competencies. The categorisation was then analysed to suggest a holistic framework for healthcare leadership competence.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nForty-one papers were included in the review. Coding and analysing the competence descriptions resulted in 12 healthcare leadership competence categories: (1) character, (2) interpersonal relations, (3) leadership, (4) professionalism, (5) soft HRM, (6) management, (7) organisational knowledge, (8) technology, (9) knowledge of the healthcare environment, (10) change and innovation, (11) knowledge transformation and (12) boundary spanning. Based on this result, a holistic framework for understanding and analysing healthcare services leadership competencies was suggested. This framework suggests that the 12 categories of healthcare leadership competencies include a range of knowledge, skills and abilities that can be understood across the dimension personal - and technical, and organisational internal and - external competencies.\n\n\nRESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS\nThis literature review was conducted with the results of searching only two electronic databases. Because of this, there is a chance that there exist empirical studies that could have added to the development of the competence categories or could have contradicted some of the descriptions used in this analysis that were assessed as quite harmonised. A CIS also opens for a broader search, including the grey literature, books, policy documents and so on, but this study was limited to peer-reviewed empirical studies. This limitation could also have affected the result, as complex phenomenon such as competence might have been disclosed in greater details in, for example, books.\n\n\nPRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS\nThe holistic framework for healthcare leadership competences offers a common understanding of a \"fuzzy\" concept such as competence and can be used to identify specific competency needs in healthcare organisations, to develop strategic competency plans and educational programmes for healthcare leaders.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThis study reveals a lack of consensus regarding the use and understanding of the concept of competence, and that key competencies addressed in the included papers are described vastly different in terms of what knowledge, skills and abilities they entail. This challenges the operationalisation of healthcare services leadership competencies. The proposed framework for healthcare services leadership competencies offers a common understanding of work-related competencies and a possibility to analyse key leadership competencies based on a holistic framework.","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"59 50","pages":"99-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-08-2023-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Healthcare providers are under pressure due to increasing and more complex demands for services. Increased pressure on budgets and human resources adds to an ever-growing problem set. Competent leaders are in demand to ensure effective and well-performing healthcare organisations that deliver balanced results and high-quality services. Researchers have made significant efforts to identify and define determining competencies for healthcare leadership. Broad terms such as competence are, however, inherently at risk of becoming too generic to add analytical value. The purpose of this study is to suggest a holistic framework for understanding healthcare leadership competence, that can be crucial for operationalising important healthcare leadership competencies for researchers, decision-makers as well as practitioners. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH In the present study, a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) was conducted to analyse competency descriptions for healthcare leaders. The descriptions were retrieved from peer reviewed empirical studies published between 2010 and 2022 that aimed to identify healthcare services leadership competencies. Grounded theory was utilised to code the data and inductively develop new categories of healthcare leadership competencies. The categorisation was then analysed to suggest a holistic framework for healthcare leadership competence. FINDINGS Forty-one papers were included in the review. Coding and analysing the competence descriptions resulted in 12 healthcare leadership competence categories: (1) character, (2) interpersonal relations, (3) leadership, (4) professionalism, (5) soft HRM, (6) management, (7) organisational knowledge, (8) technology, (9) knowledge of the healthcare environment, (10) change and innovation, (11) knowledge transformation and (12) boundary spanning. Based on this result, a holistic framework for understanding and analysing healthcare services leadership competencies was suggested. This framework suggests that the 12 categories of healthcare leadership competencies include a range of knowledge, skills and abilities that can be understood across the dimension personal - and technical, and organisational internal and - external competencies. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS This literature review was conducted with the results of searching only two electronic databases. Because of this, there is a chance that there exist empirical studies that could have added to the development of the competence categories or could have contradicted some of the descriptions used in this analysis that were assessed as quite harmonised. A CIS also opens for a broader search, including the grey literature, books, policy documents and so on, but this study was limited to peer-reviewed empirical studies. This limitation could also have affected the result, as complex phenomenon such as competence might have been disclosed in greater details in, for example, books. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The holistic framework for healthcare leadership competences offers a common understanding of a "fuzzy" concept such as competence and can be used to identify specific competency needs in healthcare organisations, to develop strategic competency plans and educational programmes for healthcare leaders. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study reveals a lack of consensus regarding the use and understanding of the concept of competence, and that key competencies addressed in the included papers are described vastly different in terms of what knowledge, skills and abilities they entail. This challenges the operationalisation of healthcare services leadership competencies. The proposed framework for healthcare services leadership competencies offers a common understanding of work-related competencies and a possibility to analyse key leadership competencies based on a holistic framework.
提出理解医疗服务领导能力的整体框架--批判性解释综合。
目的由于对服务的需求越来越多、越来越复杂,医疗服务提供者面临着压力。预算和人力资源压力的增加使问题越来越多。为了确保医疗保健机构能够提供有效和良好的表现,实现平衡的结果和高质量的服务,需要有能力的领导者。研究人员在确定和定义医疗保健领导的决定性能力方面做出了巨大努力。然而,能力等宽泛的术语本身就有可能变得过于笼统,无法增加分析价值。本研究的目的是提出一个理解医疗保健领导能力的整体框架,该框架对于研究人员、决策者和从业人员操作重要的医疗保健领导能力至关重要。设计/方法/途径在本研究中,我们采用了批判性解释综合法(CIS)来分析医疗保健领导的能力描述。这些描述是从 2010 年至 2022 年间发表的旨在确定医疗保健服务领导能力的同行评审实证研究中获取的。利用基础理论对数据进行编码,并归纳出医疗保健领导能力的新类别。然后对分类进行分析,提出了医疗服务领导能力的整体框架。通过对能力描述进行编码和分析,得出了 12 个医疗保健领导能力类别:(1)性格;(2)人际关系;(3)领导力;(4)专业精神;(5)软性人力资源管理;(6)管理;(7)组织知识;(8)技术;(9)医疗保健环境知识;(10)变革与创新;(11)知识转化;(12)边界跨越。根据这一结果,提出了一个理解和分析医疗服务领导能力的整体框架。该框架认为,医疗服务领导能力的 12 个类别包括一系列知识、技能和能力,这些知识、技能和能力可以从个人能力、技术能力、组织内部能力和外部能力等维度进行理解。因此,有可能存在一些实证研究,这些研究可能对能力类别的发展起到补充作用,也可能与本分析中使用的某些描述相矛盾,而这些描述被评估为相当协调。综合信息系统还可以进行更广泛的搜索,包括灰色文献、书籍、政策文件等,但本研究仅限于经同行评审的实证研究。这一局限性也可能会影响研究结果,因为复杂的现象(如胜任能力)可能会在书籍等资料中得到更详细的披露。实践启示医疗保健领导能力的整体框架为胜任能力这样一个 "模糊 "概念提供了一种共识,可用于确定医疗保健组织的具体能力需求,制定战略能力计划和医疗保健领导者教育计划。本研究的原创性/价值本研究揭示了在能力概念的使用和理解方面缺乏共识,而且所收录论文中涉及的关键能力在知识、技能和能力方面的描述大相径庭。这对医疗服务领导能力的可操作性提出了挑战。拟议的医疗服务领导能力框架提供了对工作相关能力的共同理解,并为基于整体框架分析关键领导能力提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信