Analysis of the Prevalence of Lumbar Annular Tears in Adult Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data

Q3 Health Professions
Mohammad Davoudi, R. Zabibah, A. Ramírez-Coronel, Ali Hussein Demin Al-Khafaji, Acim Heri Iswanto, G. Ataei, Elham Yousefi, Fatemeh Zahra Nosrati, D. Fazilat-Panah
{"title":"Analysis of the Prevalence of Lumbar Annular Tears in Adult Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data","authors":"Mohammad Davoudi, R. Zabibah, A. Ramírez-Coronel, Ali Hussein Demin Al-Khafaji, Acim Heri Iswanto, G. Ataei, Elham Yousefi, Fatemeh Zahra Nosrati, D. Fazilat-Panah","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the lumbar annular tears prevalence regarding the patient’s history factors, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) recorded data. \nMaterials and Methods: In this study, 218 patients (106 men and 112 women) were evaluated; 136 cases (63 men and 73 women, 20-80 years, mean: 45.4±14.8 years) with Lower Back Pain (LBP) and High-Intensity Zone (HIZ) were diagnosed based on MR images. The diagnosed annular tears from the MRI data, Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m2), and physical activity of the patients were recorded, and the prevalence of lumbar annular tears was evaluated regarding the mentioned parameters. \nResults: The prevalence of annular tears was 31.6% at L5/S1 (43/136 patients), 43.4% at L4/L5 (59/136 patients), 16.9% at L3/L4 (23/136 patients), 4.4% at L2/L3 (6/136 patients), and 3.7% at L1/L2 spinal disc space (5/136 patients). Most patients with annular tears had LBP (>60%). Based on the patient's history, 25% of patients had BMI above 30, 8.8% had post-traumatic history, 15.4% had a history of falling down, 19.1% had slipped down history, 16.2% were athletes, and 15.4% performed heavy work. \nConclusion: The prevalence of lumbar annular tears was higher in patients having LBP and a BMI over 30, which should be considered possible risk factors. This study demonstrated that annular tears are more likely to occur in lower lumbar discs, especially in L4/L5 and L5/S1 discs.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the lumbar annular tears prevalence regarding the patient’s history factors, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) recorded data. Materials and Methods: In this study, 218 patients (106 men and 112 women) were evaluated; 136 cases (63 men and 73 women, 20-80 years, mean: 45.4±14.8 years) with Lower Back Pain (LBP) and High-Intensity Zone (HIZ) were diagnosed based on MR images. The diagnosed annular tears from the MRI data, Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m2), and physical activity of the patients were recorded, and the prevalence of lumbar annular tears was evaluated regarding the mentioned parameters. Results: The prevalence of annular tears was 31.6% at L5/S1 (43/136 patients), 43.4% at L4/L5 (59/136 patients), 16.9% at L3/L4 (23/136 patients), 4.4% at L2/L3 (6/136 patients), and 3.7% at L1/L2 spinal disc space (5/136 patients). Most patients with annular tears had LBP (>60%). Based on the patient's history, 25% of patients had BMI above 30, 8.8% had post-traumatic history, 15.4% had a history of falling down, 19.1% had slipped down history, 16.2% were athletes, and 15.4% performed heavy work. Conclusion: The prevalence of lumbar annular tears was higher in patients having LBP and a BMI over 30, which should be considered possible risk factors. This study demonstrated that annular tears are more likely to occur in lower lumbar discs, especially in L4/L5 and L5/S1 discs.
利用磁共振成像数据分析成年患者腰椎环撕裂的患病率
目的:本研究旨在根据患者的病史因素和磁共振成像(MRI)记录数据评估腰椎环撕裂的发生率。材料与方法:本研究评估了 218 例患者(男性 106 例,女性 112 例),其中 136 例(男性 63 例,女性 73 例,20-80 岁,平均 45.4±14.8 岁)根据磁共振成像诊断为腰背痛(LBP)和高强度区(HIZ)。记录从磁共振成像数据中诊断出的环状撕裂、患者的体重指数(BMI,kg/m2)和体力活动,并根据上述参数评估腰椎环状撕裂的发生率。结果显示环状撕裂发生率为:L5/S1 31.6%(43/136 患者),L4/L5 43.4%(59/136 患者),L3/L4 16.9%(23/136 患者),L2/L3 4.4%(6/136 患者),L1/L2 椎间盘间隙 3.7%(5/136 患者)。大多数椎间盘环撕裂患者都有腰痛(>60%)。根据患者病史,25%的患者体重指数超过30,8.8%的患者有外伤后病史,15.4%的患者有跌倒史,19.1%的患者有滑倒史,16.2%的患者是运动员,15.4%的患者从事重体力劳动。结论腰椎间盘突出症患者的腰椎环撕裂发生率较高,体重指数(BMI)超过30也应被视为可能的风险因素。该研究表明,环状撕裂更容易发生在下腰椎间盘,尤其是 L4/L5 和 L5/S1 椎间盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信