Determinants of Income Inequality Sources among Women in Rural Oyo State, Nigeria

A. O., Adenegan K.
{"title":"Determinants of Income Inequality Sources among Women in Rural Oyo State, Nigeria","authors":"A. O., Adenegan K.","doi":"10.52589/rjaed-nhmgfrt9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper applies the regression-based inequality decomposition approach to explore determinants of income inequality sources among women in rural Oyo State, Nigeria. A four-stage sampling procedure was used in the collection of primary data with purposive selection of two agricultural development programme zones in Oyo State of Nigeria. 150 respondents were eventually used for the study. Structured questionnaires and interview schedules were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Shapley decomposition approach. Age and household size of women were 35.5±1.06 years and 8.0±0.59 persons, respectively. Most respondents (88.0%) were married and 43.3% were farmers with income of N24,196.76±11,897.90 per month. Sources that largely explain inequality were primary occupation (0.5551), farm size (0.2523) and household assets (0.0766) and the relative contributions of these factors sum up to 80%. Total inequality computed by the Gini index was 0.2206 and it implies that the contribution of the predicted residual term to income inequality in this case was 22.06%.The marginal contribution of the estimated income sources of the weighted mean with no negative values from level 1 to 12 were primary occupation, educational level, workers per household, number of assets and location with weighted marginal contribution of 0.0125, 0.0120, 0.0105, 0.0071 and 0.0053 respectively. Narrowing the gap between those at the top and the bottom of income distribution will reduce inequality in the households and the nation at large and that is the more reason this study needs attention because within group components overwhelmingly accounted for inequality compared to the between group components. The role of spatial inequality and policies that encourage entrepreneurship training and non-formal education for women in rural areas would be inequality reducing, and would tend to be more effective if additional policy instruments are used to target other sources of measured income inequality.","PeriodicalId":253942,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/rjaed-nhmgfrt9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper applies the regression-based inequality decomposition approach to explore determinants of income inequality sources among women in rural Oyo State, Nigeria. A four-stage sampling procedure was used in the collection of primary data with purposive selection of two agricultural development programme zones in Oyo State of Nigeria. 150 respondents were eventually used for the study. Structured questionnaires and interview schedules were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Shapley decomposition approach. Age and household size of women were 35.5±1.06 years and 8.0±0.59 persons, respectively. Most respondents (88.0%) were married and 43.3% were farmers with income of N24,196.76±11,897.90 per month. Sources that largely explain inequality were primary occupation (0.5551), farm size (0.2523) and household assets (0.0766) and the relative contributions of these factors sum up to 80%. Total inequality computed by the Gini index was 0.2206 and it implies that the contribution of the predicted residual term to income inequality in this case was 22.06%.The marginal contribution of the estimated income sources of the weighted mean with no negative values from level 1 to 12 were primary occupation, educational level, workers per household, number of assets and location with weighted marginal contribution of 0.0125, 0.0120, 0.0105, 0.0071 and 0.0053 respectively. Narrowing the gap between those at the top and the bottom of income distribution will reduce inequality in the households and the nation at large and that is the more reason this study needs attention because within group components overwhelmingly accounted for inequality compared to the between group components. The role of spatial inequality and policies that encourage entrepreneurship training and non-formal education for women in rural areas would be inequality reducing, and would tend to be more effective if additional policy instruments are used to target other sources of measured income inequality.
尼日利亚奥约州农村妇女收入不平等来源的决定因素
本文采用基于回归的不平等分解方法来探讨尼日利亚奥约州农村妇女收入不平等来源的决定因素。在收集原始数据时采用了四阶段抽样程序,有目的性地选择了尼日利亚奥约州的两个农业发展计划区。研究最终使用了 150 名受访者。收集数据时使用了结构化问卷和访谈表。数据分析采用了描述性统计和 Shapley 分解法。妇女的年龄和家庭规模分别为 35.5±1.06 岁和 8.0±0.59 人。大多数受访者(88.0%)已婚,43.3%为农民,月收入为(24,196.76±11,897.90)纳克法。主要解释不平等的来源是主要职业(0.5551)、农场规模(0.2523)和家庭资产(0.0766),这些因素的相对贡献率总和为 80%。用吉尼指数计算的总不平等率为 0.2206,这意味着在这种情况下,预测残差项对收入不平等的贡献率为 22.06%。从 1 到 12 级,加权平均值无负值的估计收入来源的边际贡献率分别为初级职业、教育水平、每户工人、资产数量和地点,加权边际贡献率分别为 0.0125、0.0120、0.0105、0.0071 和 0.0053。缩小收入分配顶层和底层之间的差距将减少家庭和整个国家的不平等,这也是本研究需要关注的更多原因,因为与组间因素相比,组内因素在不平等中占压倒性优势。空间不平等的作用以及鼓励农村妇女创业培训和非正规教育的政策将减少不平等现象,如果利用其他政策工具来针对其他已衡量的收入不平等来源,则会更加有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信