Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC

Q3 Health Professions
Naeem Shareef Abdulhusein, M. Deevband, Mohammad Ali Ghodsirad, Marziyeh Behmadi, G. Mehri-Kakavand
{"title":"Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC","authors":"Naeem Shareef Abdulhusein, M. Deevband, Mohammad Ali Ghodsirad, Marziyeh Behmadi, G. Mehri-Kakavand","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Given that the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality is defined experimentally, developing a specialized scanning technique for each procedure is necessary to increase the diagnosis accuracy. This study aims to determine the optimal algorithm for liver scan reconstruction using 99mTc/SPECT. \nMaterials and Methods: The Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) reconstruction method was used in liver scanning using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) for SPECT images of 30 patients which were acquired with a dual-head EvoExel detector system. Using different types of filters in SPECT imaging, various optimal results can be achieved in the processed images, such as artifact reduction, noise reduction, or signal enhancement and recovery. To evaluate the effect of different filters on image quality, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), and contrast parameters were calculated. \nResults: Applying filters enhanced contrast in the images in most cases as well as CNR and SNR. Metz (power = 2), Shepp-Logan (Cut-off frequency = 0.67) and Metz (power = 2) filters increase the CNR, contrast and SNR in images more than the other filters, respectively. The maximum improvement for CNR, contrast and SNR was from 0.62 to 2.35, 0.99 to 1.31, and 8.48 to 14.70, respectively. \nConclusion: Based on the results, the Hamming filter, due to providing high-quality images for visual analysis of liver SPECT, and the Butterworth filter, due to balancing the image quality and noise for quantitative analysis, are recommended.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"30 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v11i2.15342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given that the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) image quality is defined experimentally, developing a specialized scanning technique for each procedure is necessary to increase the diagnosis accuracy. This study aims to determine the optimal algorithm for liver scan reconstruction using 99mTc/SPECT. Materials and Methods: The Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) reconstruction method was used in liver scanning using 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) for SPECT images of 30 patients which were acquired with a dual-head EvoExel detector system. Using different types of filters in SPECT imaging, various optimal results can be achieved in the processed images, such as artifact reduction, noise reduction, or signal enhancement and recovery. To evaluate the effect of different filters on image quality, Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), and contrast parameters were calculated. Results: Applying filters enhanced contrast in the images in most cases as well as CNR and SNR. Metz (power = 2), Shepp-Logan (Cut-off frequency = 0.67) and Metz (power = 2) filters increase the CNR, contrast and SNR in images more than the other filters, respectively. The maximum improvement for CNR, contrast and SNR was from 0.62 to 2.35, 0.99 to 1.31, and 8.48 to 14.70, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results, the Hamming filter, due to providing high-quality images for visual analysis of liver SPECT, and the Butterworth filter, due to balancing the image quality and noise for quantitative analysis, are recommended.
使用 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC 评估肝脏扫描中的 SPECT 图像重建使用 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC 评估肝脏扫描中的 SPECT 图像重建
目的:鉴于单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的图像质量是通过实验确定的,因此有必要为每种手术开发专门的扫描技术,以提高诊断的准确性。本研究旨在确定使用 99mTc/SPECT 进行肝脏扫描重建的最佳算法。材料和方法:在使用 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (Tektrotyd) 进行肝脏扫描时,采用了过滤背投影(FBP)重建方法,对 30 名患者的 SPECT 图像进行了重建,这些图像是使用双头 EvoExel 探测器系统采集的。在 SPECT 成像中使用不同类型的滤波器,可使处理后的图像达到各种最佳效果,如减少伪影、降低噪音或信号增强和恢复。为了评估不同滤光片对图像质量的影响,我们计算了信号噪比(SNR)、对比噪比(CNR)和对比度参数。结果显示在大多数情况下,应用滤光片增强了图像的对比度以及 CNR 和 SNR。与其他滤波器相比,Metz(功率 = 2)、Shepp-Logan(截止频率 = 0.67)和 Metz(功率 = 2)滤波器分别提高了图像的 CNR、对比度和信噪比。CNR、对比度和信噪比的最大提高幅度分别为 0.62 至 2.35、0.99 至 1.31 和 8.48 至 14.70。结论根据研究结果,推荐使用汉明滤波器和巴特沃斯滤波器,前者可为肝脏 SPECT 的视觉分析提供高质量图像,后者可平衡图像质量和噪声,便于定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信