Untangling the perception of value in value-based healthcare - an interview study.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Axel Wolf, Annette Erichsen Andersson, Ewa Wikström, Fredrik Bååthe
{"title":"Untangling the perception of value in value-based healthcare - an interview study.","authors":"Axel Wolf, Annette Erichsen Andersson, Ewa Wikström, Fredrik Bååthe","doi":"10.1108/LHS-07-2023-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nValue-based health care (VBHC) argues that health-care needs to re-focus to maximise value creation, defining value as the quota when dividing the outcomes important for the patient, by the cost for health care to deliver such outcomes. This study aims to explore the perception of value among different stakeholders involved in the process of implementing VBHC at a Swedish hospital to support leaders to be more efficient and effective when developing health care.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nParticipants comprised 19 clinicians and non-clinicians involved in the implementation of VBHC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and content analysis was performed.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThe clinicians described value as a dynamic concept, dependent on the patient and the clinical setting, stating that improving outcomes was more important than containing costs. The value for non-clinicians appeared more driven by the interplay between the outcome and the cost. Non-clinicians related VBHC to a strategic framework for governance or for monitoring different continuous improvement processes, while clinicians appreciated VBHC, as they perceived its introduction as an opportunity to focus more on outcomes for patients and less on cost containment.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThere is variation in how clinicians and non-clinicians perceive the key concept of value when implementing VBHC. Clinicians focus on increasing treatment efficacy and improving medical outcomes but have a limited focus on cost and what patients consider most valuable. If the concept of value is defined primarily by clinicians' own assumptions, there is a clear risk that the foundational premise of VBHC, to understand what outcomes patients value in their specific situation in relation to the cost to produce such outcome, will fail. Health-care leaders need to ensure that patients and the non-clinicians' perception of value, is integrated with the clinical perception, if VBHC is to deliver on its promise.","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"134 9‐12","pages":"130-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-07-2023-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Value-based health care (VBHC) argues that health-care needs to re-focus to maximise value creation, defining value as the quota when dividing the outcomes important for the patient, by the cost for health care to deliver such outcomes. This study aims to explore the perception of value among different stakeholders involved in the process of implementing VBHC at a Swedish hospital to support leaders to be more efficient and effective when developing health care. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Participants comprised 19 clinicians and non-clinicians involved in the implementation of VBHC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and content analysis was performed. FINDINGS The clinicians described value as a dynamic concept, dependent on the patient and the clinical setting, stating that improving outcomes was more important than containing costs. The value for non-clinicians appeared more driven by the interplay between the outcome and the cost. Non-clinicians related VBHC to a strategic framework for governance or for monitoring different continuous improvement processes, while clinicians appreciated VBHC, as they perceived its introduction as an opportunity to focus more on outcomes for patients and less on cost containment. ORIGINALITY/VALUE There is variation in how clinicians and non-clinicians perceive the key concept of value when implementing VBHC. Clinicians focus on increasing treatment efficacy and improving medical outcomes but have a limited focus on cost and what patients consider most valuable. If the concept of value is defined primarily by clinicians' own assumptions, there is a clear risk that the foundational premise of VBHC, to understand what outcomes patients value in their specific situation in relation to the cost to produce such outcome, will fail. Health-care leaders need to ensure that patients and the non-clinicians' perception of value, is integrated with the clinical perception, if VBHC is to deliver on its promise.
解读以价值为基础的医疗保健中的价值认知--访谈研究。
目的以价值为基础的医疗保健(VBHC)认为,医疗保健需要重新关注价值创造的最大化,将价值定义为将对患者重要的结果与提供这些结果的医疗保健成本相除的定额。本研究旨在探讨瑞典一家医院实施 VBHC 过程中不同利益相关者对价值的认识,以支持领导者在发展医疗保健时提高效率和效益。结果临床医生认为价值是一个动态的概念,取决于患者和临床环境,并指出提高疗效比控制成本更重要。非临床医生的价值似乎更多地取决于疗效和成本之间的相互作用。非临床医生将 VBHC 与管理或监控不同持续改进流程的战略框架联系起来,而临床医生则对 VBHC 表示赞赏,因为他们认为引入 VBHC 是一个机会,可以更多地关注患者的治疗效果,而较少关注成本控制。临床医生注重提高治疗效果和改善医疗结果,但对成本和患者认为最有价值的东西关注有限。如果价值的概念主要由临床医生自己的假设来定义,那么 VBHC 的基本前提,即了解患者在其特定情况下所看重的结果与产生这种结果的成本之间的关系,显然有可能会失败。医疗保健领导者需要确保患者和非临床医生对价值的认识与临床认识相结合,这样才能实现自愿基础保健的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信