Research and education strategies as a factor of cultural innovation: experience of the United Kingdom

Olga Ovcharuk
{"title":"Research and education strategies as a factor of cultural innovation: experience of the United Kingdom","authors":"Olga Ovcharuk","doi":"10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of research and educational strategies as factors of cultural innovation by analysing the practical experience of research and educational institutions of the United Kingdom. The methodology of the study is to use a systematic approach to determine the systemic vision of cultural innovation by different institutions of the United Kingdom. The main research methods are: comparative method – for a comparative analysis of institutional development approaches, concepts of research projects and educational programmes; structural and typological method – to identify the features of the institutional system and identify its typological features; method of semiotic analysis – to interpret the content of cultural projects and art educational programmes as sign systems in the cultural space; method of theoretical generalisation – to summarise the research results. The scientific novelty lies in the generalisation of the experience of government institutions (Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport, Arts Council England), research institutions (Research and Innovation, Arts and Humanities Research Council) and educational institutions (King's College London, Kingston University School of Art, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lincoln) of the United Kingdom aimed at developing research programmes, projects, determining their priorities and funding conditions as substantive components of promising research. Conclusions. The strategic priorities that ensure the development of cultural innovations are research and development of the latest technologies, including artificial intelligence, immersive technologies in art, virtual, augmented and mixed reality, digital culture, and integration of their results in the cultural industries. Educational strategies are characterised by interdisciplinarity, focus on digital humanities, visual arts, media, and creative industries. This makes it possible to overcome traditional disciplinary boundaries, create new specialisations, and use the potential of art to solve complex real-world problems and achieve real socially significant change.\n ","PeriodicalId":510501,"journal":{"name":"NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD","volume":"335 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of research and educational strategies as factors of cultural innovation by analysing the practical experience of research and educational institutions of the United Kingdom. The methodology of the study is to use a systematic approach to determine the systemic vision of cultural innovation by different institutions of the United Kingdom. The main research methods are: comparative method – for a comparative analysis of institutional development approaches, concepts of research projects and educational programmes; structural and typological method – to identify the features of the institutional system and identify its typological features; method of semiotic analysis – to interpret the content of cultural projects and art educational programmes as sign systems in the cultural space; method of theoretical generalisation – to summarise the research results. The scientific novelty lies in the generalisation of the experience of government institutions (Ministry of Culture, Media and Sport, Arts Council England), research institutions (Research and Innovation, Arts and Humanities Research Council) and educational institutions (King's College London, Kingston University School of Art, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lincoln) of the United Kingdom aimed at developing research programmes, projects, determining their priorities and funding conditions as substantive components of promising research. Conclusions. The strategic priorities that ensure the development of cultural innovations are research and development of the latest technologies, including artificial intelligence, immersive technologies in art, virtual, augmented and mixed reality, digital culture, and integration of their results in the cultural industries. Educational strategies are characterised by interdisciplinarity, focus on digital humanities, visual arts, media, and creative industries. This makes it possible to overcome traditional disciplinary boundaries, create new specialisations, and use the potential of art to solve complex real-world problems and achieve real socially significant change.  
作为文化创新因素的研究和教育战略:英国的经验
本文旨在通过分析英国研究和教育机构的实践经验,揭示作为文化创新因素的研究和教育战略的本质。研究方法是采用系统方法来确定英国不同机构对文化创新的系统看法。主要研究方法有:比较法--对机构发展方法、研究项目和教育计划的概念进行比较分析;结构和类型学方法--确定机构系统的特征并确定其类型学特征;符号学分析方法--将文化项目和艺术教育计划的内容解释为文化空间中的符号系统;理论概括方法--总结研究成果。科学新颖性在于对英国政府机构(文化、媒体和体育部、英格兰艺术理事会)、研究机构(研究与创新、艺术与人文研究理事会)和教育机构(伦敦国王学院、金斯顿大学艺术学院、艺术、社会科学与人文学院、林肯大学)的经验进行了归纳,旨在制定研究计划和项目,确定其优先事项和资助条件,作为有前途研究的实质性组成部分。结论。确保文化创新发展的战略重点是研究和开发最新技术,包括人工智能、艺术领域的沉浸式技术、虚拟现实、增强现实和混合现实、数字文化,以及将其成果融入文化产业。教育战略的特点是跨学科,侧重于数字人文、视觉艺术、媒体和创意产业。这就有可能突破传统学科的界限,创建新的专业,并利用艺术的潜力来解决复杂的现实问题,实现真正具有社会意义的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书