Social proof: empowering social commerce through social validation

Nitin Patwa, Monika Gupta, Amit Mittal
{"title":"Social proof: empowering social commerce through social validation","authors":"Nitin Patwa, Monika Gupta, Amit Mittal","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-06-2023-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to examine the impact of consumer risk appetite, biases (specifically negative recency bias), and the importance of reviews in enhancing information quality. By analyzing these variables, the authors gain insights into their role in enriching the overall information spectrum available to consumers. The findings contribute to a better understanding of how risk appetite, biases and consumer reviews shape the quality of information.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe questionnaire assessed the relationship between dependent and independent variables by asking participants to rate their experiences in relevant scenarios. Variance-based structural equation modeling with the ADANCO program was used to examine the data. ADANCO software is used explicitly for variance-based structural equation modeling. To evaluate research models and test hypotheses, partial least square path modeling is used.\n\nFindings\nThe efficiency of reviews and ratings is greatly influenced by consumer risk appetite. Businesses should focus on clients who are willing to take risks and balance positive and negative feedback. It is essential to comprehend how customers understand reviews. Credibility is increased by taking biases into account and encouraging unbiased criticism. Promoting thorough reviews strengthens influence. Monitoring and making use of these elements improve online reputation and commercial success.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research has limitations due to the simplicity of the attributes taken into account and the requirement for a larger sample size. Overcoming barriers to promote consistent client feedback is essential, and tailored emails can help with assessment generation. Increased customer participation in writing evaluations can be achieved by removing obstacles and highlighting the advantages of participation.\n\nOriginality/value\nBusinesses and buyers rely on this “organically” generated content as the basis of their promotional strategy and buying decisions. Most of the research is related to consumer reviews, their behavior and the importance of social validation. However, some critical aspects related to this need further investigation.\n","PeriodicalId":507843,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","volume":"6 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-06-2023-0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of consumer risk appetite, biases (specifically negative recency bias), and the importance of reviews in enhancing information quality. By analyzing these variables, the authors gain insights into their role in enriching the overall information spectrum available to consumers. The findings contribute to a better understanding of how risk appetite, biases and consumer reviews shape the quality of information. Design/methodology/approach The questionnaire assessed the relationship between dependent and independent variables by asking participants to rate their experiences in relevant scenarios. Variance-based structural equation modeling with the ADANCO program was used to examine the data. ADANCO software is used explicitly for variance-based structural equation modeling. To evaluate research models and test hypotheses, partial least square path modeling is used. Findings The efficiency of reviews and ratings is greatly influenced by consumer risk appetite. Businesses should focus on clients who are willing to take risks and balance positive and negative feedback. It is essential to comprehend how customers understand reviews. Credibility is increased by taking biases into account and encouraging unbiased criticism. Promoting thorough reviews strengthens influence. Monitoring and making use of these elements improve online reputation and commercial success. Research limitations/implications The research has limitations due to the simplicity of the attributes taken into account and the requirement for a larger sample size. Overcoming barriers to promote consistent client feedback is essential, and tailored emails can help with assessment generation. Increased customer participation in writing evaluations can be achieved by removing obstacles and highlighting the advantages of participation. Originality/value Businesses and buyers rely on this “organically” generated content as the basis of their promotional strategy and buying decisions. Most of the research is related to consumer reviews, their behavior and the importance of social validation. However, some critical aspects related to this need further investigation.
社交证明:通过社交验证增强社交商务能力
研究目的 本研究旨在探讨消费者风险偏好、偏差(特别是负面回顾偏差)以及评论对提高信息质量的重要性的影响。通过分析这些变量,作者深入了解了它们在丰富消费者可获得的总体信息方面所起的作用。调查结果有助于更好地理解风险偏好、偏差和消费者评论是如何影响信息质量的。设计/方法/途径问卷调查通过要求参与者对其在相关场景中的体验进行评分,评估因变量和自变量之间的关系。使用 ADANCO 程序进行基于方差的结构方程建模来检验数据。ADANCO 软件专门用于基于方差的结构方程建模。为了评估研究模型和检验假设,使用了偏最小二乘法路径模型。企业应关注愿意承担风险的客户,并平衡正面和负面反馈。了解客户如何理解评论至关重要。考虑偏见并鼓励不带偏见的批评,可以提高可信度。促进全面的评论可增强影响力。由于所考虑的属性比较简单,而且需要更大的样本量,因此这项研究存在局限性。克服障碍以促进一致的客户反馈至关重要,量身定制的电子邮件有助于评估的生成。原创性/价值企业和买家依靠这些 "有机 "生成的内容作为促销策略和购买决策的基础。大部分研究都与消费者评论、其行为以及社会验证的重要性有关。然而,与此相关的一些关键方面还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信