Experimental study of the effect of rectangular debris blockage on the scour hole development around a cylindrical bridge pier

Ali Mahdian Khalili, Mehdi Hamidi, Pouria Akbari Dadamahalleh
{"title":"Experimental study of the effect of rectangular debris blockage on the scour hole development around a cylindrical bridge pier","authors":"Ali Mahdian Khalili, Mehdi Hamidi, Pouria Akbari Dadamahalleh","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Studying the influences of the debris settled by the flood upstream of the bridge pier on the scour is important. In the present study, experimental tests were performed as four models including the bridge pier, the bridge pier with buried debris, the bridge pier with the free debris, and the bridge pier with free debris and the bed sill with the downstream gap equal to 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 times of pier diameter. The results showed that buried debris increased the maximum length of the scour hole (ls), and the maximum width of the scour hole (ws) by about 50, and 180% respectively in comparison with the alone pier. It resulted that buried debris has a more increased effect than free debris. Free debris at low submergence ratios reduces ls by up to 27%, and in high submergence ratios increases it by up to 37%. Also, free debris increases ws in all submergence ratios, which is by up to 127% for the critical case compared to the case without debris. At all distances, the bed sill reduces ls and ws, and the best performance for reducing ls and ws is when it is attached to the bridge pier.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studying the influences of the debris settled by the flood upstream of the bridge pier on the scour is important. In the present study, experimental tests were performed as four models including the bridge pier, the bridge pier with buried debris, the bridge pier with the free debris, and the bridge pier with free debris and the bed sill with the downstream gap equal to 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 times of pier diameter. The results showed that buried debris increased the maximum length of the scour hole (ls), and the maximum width of the scour hole (ws) by about 50, and 180% respectively in comparison with the alone pier. It resulted that buried debris has a more increased effect than free debris. Free debris at low submergence ratios reduces ls by up to 27%, and in high submergence ratios increases it by up to 37%. Also, free debris increases ws in all submergence ratios, which is by up to 127% for the critical case compared to the case without debris. At all distances, the bed sill reduces ls and ws, and the best performance for reducing ls and ws is when it is attached to the bridge pier.
矩形碎片堵塞对圆柱形桥墩周围冲刷孔发展影响的实验研究
研究桥墩上游洪水沉降的碎屑对冲刷的影响非常重要。本研究以桥墩、埋有碎屑的桥墩、带有自由碎屑的桥墩以及带有自由碎屑的桥墩和下游间隙等于 0、1、2、3 和 4 倍桥墩直径的桥墩为模型进行了试验。结果表明,与单独桥墩相比,埋入的碎屑使冲刷孔的最大长度(ls)和最大宽度(ws)分别增加了约 50% 和 180%。结果表明,埋入的泥石比游离的泥石具有更大的增大效应。在低淹没比的情况下,游离碎屑最多可使ls减少27%,而在高淹没比的情况下,最多可使ls增加37%。此外,在所有淹没比情况下,游离碎屑都会增加 ws,临界情况比无碎屑情况最多增加 127%。在所有距离上,床墩都能降低 ls 和 ws,而降低 ls 和 ws 的最佳方法是将床墩固定在桥墩上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信