Centering community and collaboration in a multi-year literacy professional development initiative between a university and school district

Rebecca Rogers, Martille Elias, LaTisha Smith, Melinda Scheetz
{"title":"Centering community and collaboration in a multi-year literacy professional development initiative between a university and school district","authors":"Rebecca Rogers, Martille Elias, LaTisha Smith, Melinda Scheetz","doi":"10.1108/sup-10-2023-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper shares findings from a multi-year literacy professional development partnership between a school district and university (2014–2019). We share this case of a Literacy Cohort initiative as an example of cross-institutional professional development situated within several of NAPDS’ nine essentials, including professional learning and leading, boundary-spanning roles and reflection and innovation (NAPDS, 2021).Design/methodology/approachWe asked, “In what ways did the Cohort initiative create conditions for community and collaboration in the service of meaningful literacy reforms?” Drawing on social design methodology (Gutiérrez & Vossoughi, 2010), we sought to generate and examine the educational change associated with this multi-year initiative. Our data set included programmatic data, interviews (N = 30) and artifacts of literacy teaching, learning and leading.FindingsOur findings reflect the emphasis areas that are important to educators in the partnership: diversity by design, building relationships through collaboration and rooting literacy reforms in teacher leadership. Our discussion explores threads of reciprocity, simultaneous renewal and boundary-spanning leadership and their role in sustaining partnerships over time.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to our understanding of building and sustaining a cohort model of multi-year professional development through the voices, perspectives and experiences of teachers, faculty and district administrators.","PeriodicalId":358031,"journal":{"name":"School-University Partnerships","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School-University Partnerships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-10-2023-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper shares findings from a multi-year literacy professional development partnership between a school district and university (2014–2019). We share this case of a Literacy Cohort initiative as an example of cross-institutional professional development situated within several of NAPDS’ nine essentials, including professional learning and leading, boundary-spanning roles and reflection and innovation (NAPDS, 2021).Design/methodology/approachWe asked, “In what ways did the Cohort initiative create conditions for community and collaboration in the service of meaningful literacy reforms?” Drawing on social design methodology (Gutiérrez & Vossoughi, 2010), we sought to generate and examine the educational change associated with this multi-year initiative. Our data set included programmatic data, interviews (N = 30) and artifacts of literacy teaching, learning and leading.FindingsOur findings reflect the emphasis areas that are important to educators in the partnership: diversity by design, building relationships through collaboration and rooting literacy reforms in teacher leadership. Our discussion explores threads of reciprocity, simultaneous renewal and boundary-spanning leadership and their role in sustaining partnerships over time.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to our understanding of building and sustaining a cohort model of multi-year professional development through the voices, perspectives and experiences of teachers, faculty and district administrators.
在大学与学区的多年扫盲专业发展计划中,以社区和合作为中心
目的 本文分享了一个学区与大学之间多年扫盲专业发展伙伴关系(2014-2019 年)的研究成果。我们分享了这一 "扫盲同侪计划 "案例,将其作为跨机构专业发展的一个范例,并将其与 "全国扫盲发展战略 "的九项基本原则结合起来,包括专业学习与领导、跨越边界的角色以及反思与创新("全国扫盲发展战略",2021 年)。"设计/方法/途径 "我们问:"'同侪计划'在哪些方面为社区和合作创造了条件,以服务于有意义的扫盲改革?"借鉴社会设计方法(Gutiérrez & Vossoughi,2010 年),我们试图产生并研究与这一多年倡议相关的教育变革。我们的数据集包括计划数据、访谈(N = 30)以及扫盲教学、学习和领导的人工制品。研究结果我们的研究结果反映了对合作关系中的教育工作者非常重要的重点领域:设计多样性、通过合作建立关系以及将扫盲改革植根于教师领导力中。我们的讨论探讨了互惠、同步更新和跨越边界的领导力及其在长期维系伙伴关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信