STOMP during COVID-19: use of psychotropic medication in intellectual disabilities community services – pilot QI project

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sadia Zahid, Bushra Rauf, Rachel Lee, Hafsa Sheikh, Ashok Roy, Rani Pathania
{"title":"STOMP during COVID-19: use of psychotropic medication in intellectual disabilities community services – pilot QI project","authors":"Sadia Zahid, Bushra Rauf, Rachel Lee, Hafsa Sheikh, Ashok Roy, Rani Pathania","doi":"10.1108/amhid-08-2023-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nA quantitative observational study was conducted. The purpose of this study is to examine the continuing adherence to the stopping over-medication of people with intellectual disability and/or autism guidelines for a cohort of outpatients seen in the outpatients’ clinics in the two teams who participated in this study to review the trend of psychotropic prescribing with a prescription indication along with the utilisation of non-pharmacological interventions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData was retrospectively collected over a period of one year for patients sampled conveniently in the outpatient’s clinic. The data was collected from two sites from psychiatric letters to the general practitioners (GPs), with the focus being psychotropic prescription indication and their adherence to British National Formulary limits, inclusion of a wider multi-disciplinary team or MDT (including nurses, psychologists and health support workers), use of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for assessing medication side effects and response to treatment.\n\n\nFindings\nMost of the patients had at least one review in the previous six months. Antipsychotics were the highest prescribed medications without an indication for their use (13.3%) followed by anxiolytics and other medications. CGI recording was suboptimal, with 26% of the patient population did not have medication side effects and effectiveness monitored through this method. In total, 41% of patients were open to community nurses followed by other disciplines.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is an original article following the pilot study completed by the authors.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-08-2023-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose A quantitative observational study was conducted. The purpose of this study is to examine the continuing adherence to the stopping over-medication of people with intellectual disability and/or autism guidelines for a cohort of outpatients seen in the outpatients’ clinics in the two teams who participated in this study to review the trend of psychotropic prescribing with a prescription indication along with the utilisation of non-pharmacological interventions. Design/methodology/approach Data was retrospectively collected over a period of one year for patients sampled conveniently in the outpatient’s clinic. The data was collected from two sites from psychiatric letters to the general practitioners (GPs), with the focus being psychotropic prescription indication and their adherence to British National Formulary limits, inclusion of a wider multi-disciplinary team or MDT (including nurses, psychologists and health support workers), use of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for assessing medication side effects and response to treatment. Findings Most of the patients had at least one review in the previous six months. Antipsychotics were the highest prescribed medications without an indication for their use (13.3%) followed by anxiolytics and other medications. CGI recording was suboptimal, with 26% of the patient population did not have medication side effects and effectiveness monitored through this method. In total, 41% of patients were open to community nurses followed by other disciplines. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is an original article following the pilot study completed by the authors.
COVID-19 期间的 STOMP:智障社区服务中精神药物的使用--试点 QI 项目
目的 开展了一项定量观察研究。本研究的目的是对参与本研究的两个团队的门诊病人群组停止对智障人士和/或自闭症患者过度用药的指导原则的持续遵守情况进行检查,以审查具有处方适应症的精神药物处方的趋势以及非药物干预措施的使用情况。设计/方法/方法对方便抽样的门诊病人进行为期一年的数据回顾性收集。数据来自两个医疗点,从精神科医生写给全科医生(GPs)的信件中收集,重点是精神药物处方的适应症及其是否符合《英国国家处方集》的限制、是否纳入了更广泛的多学科团队或 MDT(包括护士、心理学家和健康支持工作者)、是否使用了临床整体印象量表(CGI)来评估药物副作用和对治疗的反应。抗精神病药物是处方量最高的药物,但没有使用指征(13.3%),其次是抗焦虑药和其他药物。CGI记录效果不佳,26%的患者没有通过这种方法监测药物的副作用和疗效。据作者所知,这是作者完成试点研究后发表的一篇原创文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信