Clinical profile and photocontact sensitivity pattern in patients with cosmetic dermatitis: A prospective study

Kumari Monalisa, B. Sahoo
{"title":"Clinical profile and photocontact sensitivity pattern in patients with cosmetic dermatitis: A prospective study","authors":"Kumari Monalisa, B. Sahoo","doi":"10.25259/ijdvl_1110_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nWith the rise in cosmetic usage, adverse reactions related to cosmetics have also risen. Photocontact dermatitis to cosmetics is a challenging entity to diagnose and manage.\n\n\n\nTo evaluate the clinical features and photocontact sensitivity patterns in patients with cosmetic dermatitis and establish their association based on patch and photopatch test results.\n\n\n\nA prospective observational study, where 80 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cosmetic dermatitis were patch or photopatch tested (as per indication) with the Indian standard series, Indian cosmetic and fragrance series, and the patient’s personal product(s).\n\n\n\nA total of 104 positive reactions were observed in 57/80 patients, of which 50 were relevant to cosmetics usage. Sixty-five patients underwent a photopatch test, and 17 tested positive. Photosensitivity in patients was significantly associated with a positive photopatch test (p-value < 0.001). Various new photo-allergens were discovered, including propylene glycol, triethanolamine, chloroacetamide, isopropyl myristate, cetrimide and hexamine. Facial melanosis was a predominant clinical finding in 44 patients, with pigmented contact dermatitis detected in 19 (43.2%) of these cases.\n\n\n\nPatients’ personal products could not be tested on every patient. Chemical analysis of indigenous products and the individual chemical ingredients of the patient’s personal products could not be patch-tested separately. Phototesting was not performed in patients with photosensitivity.\n\n\n\nIn patients with suspected cosmetic dermatitis with history of photosensitivity or those with facial melanosis of unknown origin, a photopatch test is crucial to detect potentially hidden photo allergens. Many new photo allergens have emerged in the present study. Cosmetic companies should provide detailed information regarding each constituent of the cosmetic products.\n","PeriodicalId":513160,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijdvl_1110_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rise in cosmetic usage, adverse reactions related to cosmetics have also risen. Photocontact dermatitis to cosmetics is a challenging entity to diagnose and manage. To evaluate the clinical features and photocontact sensitivity patterns in patients with cosmetic dermatitis and establish their association based on patch and photopatch test results. A prospective observational study, where 80 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cosmetic dermatitis were patch or photopatch tested (as per indication) with the Indian standard series, Indian cosmetic and fragrance series, and the patient’s personal product(s). A total of 104 positive reactions were observed in 57/80 patients, of which 50 were relevant to cosmetics usage. Sixty-five patients underwent a photopatch test, and 17 tested positive. Photosensitivity in patients was significantly associated with a positive photopatch test (p-value < 0.001). Various new photo-allergens were discovered, including propylene glycol, triethanolamine, chloroacetamide, isopropyl myristate, cetrimide and hexamine. Facial melanosis was a predominant clinical finding in 44 patients, with pigmented contact dermatitis detected in 19 (43.2%) of these cases. Patients’ personal products could not be tested on every patient. Chemical analysis of indigenous products and the individual chemical ingredients of the patient’s personal products could not be patch-tested separately. Phototesting was not performed in patients with photosensitivity. In patients with suspected cosmetic dermatitis with history of photosensitivity or those with facial melanosis of unknown origin, a photopatch test is crucial to detect potentially hidden photo allergens. Many new photo allergens have emerged in the present study. Cosmetic companies should provide detailed information regarding each constituent of the cosmetic products.
化妆品皮炎患者的临床特征和光接触敏感模式:前瞻性研究
随着化妆品使用量的增加,与化妆品相关的不良反应也随之增加。一项前瞻性观察研究发现,80 名临床诊断为化妆品皮炎的患者接受了印度标准系列、印度化妆品和香料系列以及患者个人产品的贴片或光敏贴片测试(根据适应症)。57/80 名患者中共观察到 104 例阳性反应,其中 50 例与化妆品使用有关。65 名患者接受了光斑测试,其中 17 人呈阳性反应。患者的光敏反应与光斑测试呈阳性有明显关联(p 值小于 0.001)。发现了多种新的光过敏原,包括丙二醇、三乙醇胺、氯乙酰胺、肉豆蔻酸异丙酯、西曲酰胺和己胺。面部黑色素沉着是 44 例患者的主要临床表现,其中 19 例(43.2%)发现了色素接触性皮炎。对本土产品的化学分析和患者个人产品的单个化学成分无法分别进行贴片测试。对于有光敏感病史的疑似化妆品皮炎患者或面部黑色素沉着病因不明的患者,光斑贴试验对于检测潜在的隐藏光过敏原至关重要。本研究发现了许多新的光过敏原。化妆品公司应提供化妆品中每种成分的详细信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信