Examining the discursive construction of Chinese grassroots cybernationalism

Jiapei Gu, Salomi Boukala
{"title":"Examining the discursive construction of Chinese grassroots cybernationalism","authors":"Jiapei Gu, Salomi Boukala","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00103.gu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent years have seen a surge in Chinese grassroots nationalism. Based on the public discussion on Weibo, the\n largest social media platform in China, this study investigated the cybernationalism (re)produced during the People’s Republic of\n China’s release of the Regulations on the Administration of Permanent Residence of Foreigners in early 2020.\n Deploying a synergy of thematic analysis and the discourse-historical approach (Reisigl and\n Wodak 2005, 2016), especially its argumentative perspectives, it examined\n the articulation of bottom-up cybernationalism and how this nationalism, boosted by the party-state, turns against the party-state\n when it fails to uphold its own nationalistic rhetorics, thereby influencing the government’s immigration policymaking. The\n results revealed that the discursive construction of a dichotomy between “derogatory foreigners” and “dignified Chinese” prevents\n the implementation of the regulation; the foregrounded anti-Black sentiment reflects a (re)appreciation of the global hierarchy of\n race in China based on orientalistic views; the discursive representations of humiliated history vitally motivates\n nationalism.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"100 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00103.gu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen a surge in Chinese grassroots nationalism. Based on the public discussion on Weibo, the largest social media platform in China, this study investigated the cybernationalism (re)produced during the People’s Republic of China’s release of the Regulations on the Administration of Permanent Residence of Foreigners in early 2020. Deploying a synergy of thematic analysis and the discourse-historical approach (Reisigl and Wodak 2005, 2016), especially its argumentative perspectives, it examined the articulation of bottom-up cybernationalism and how this nationalism, boosted by the party-state, turns against the party-state when it fails to uphold its own nationalistic rhetorics, thereby influencing the government’s immigration policymaking. The results revealed that the discursive construction of a dichotomy between “derogatory foreigners” and “dignified Chinese” prevents the implementation of the regulation; the foregrounded anti-Black sentiment reflects a (re)appreciation of the global hierarchy of race in China based on orientalistic views; the discursive representations of humiliated history vitally motivates nationalism.
考察中国基层网络民族主义的话语建构
近年来,中国草根民族主义激增。本研究以中国最大的社交媒体平台--微博上的公众讨论为基础,调查了中华人民共和国于 2020 年初发布《外国人永久居留管理条例》期间(重新)产生的网络民族主义。本研究运用专题分析和话语史方法(Reisigl 和 Wodak,2005 年,2016 年),尤其是其论证视角,考察了自下而上的网络民族主义的表述,以及这种民族主义在党国的推动下,如何在党国未能坚持其自身的民族主义修辞时反戈一击,从而影响政府的移民政策制定。研究结果揭示了 "贬损的外国人 "与 "有尊严的中国人 "之间二元对立的话语建构阻碍了法规的实施;反黑人情绪的凸显反映了基于东方主义观点对中国种族全球等级制度的(重新)理解;对屈辱历史的话语表述极大地激发了民族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信