Precise cortical contributions to sensorimotor feedback control during reactive balance.

IF 4.3 2区 生物学
Scott Boebinger, Aiden M. Payne, Giovanni Martino, Kennedy Kerr, Jasmine L Mirdamadi, J. L. McKay, Michael R Borich, Lena H Ting
{"title":"Precise cortical contributions to sensorimotor feedback control during reactive balance.","authors":"Scott Boebinger, Aiden M. Payne, Giovanni Martino, Kennedy Kerr, Jasmine L Mirdamadi, J. L. McKay, Michael R Borich, Lena H Ting","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the cortex in shaping automatic whole-body motor behaviors such as walking and balance is poorly understood. Gait and balance are typically mediated through subcortical circuits, with the cortex becoming engaged as needed on an individual basis by task difficulty and complexity. However, we lack a mechanistic understanding of how increased cortical contribution to whole-body movements shapes motor output. Here we use reactive balance recovery as a paradigm to identify relationships between hierarchical control mechanisms and their engagement across balance tasks of increasing difficulty in young adults. We hypothesize that parallel sensorimotor feedback loops engaging subcortical and cortical circuits contribute to balance-correcting muscle activity, and that the involvement of cortical circuits increases with balance challenge. We decomposed balance-correcting muscle activity based on hypothesized subcortically- and cortically-mediated feedback components driven by similar sensory information, but with different loop delays. The initial balance-correcting muscle activity was engaged at all levels of balance difficulty. Its onset latency was consistent with subcortical sensorimotor loops observed in the lower limb. An even later, presumed, cortically-mediated burst of muscle activity became additionally engaged as balance task difficulty increased, at latencies consistent with longer transcortical sensorimotor loops. We further demonstrate that evoked cortical activity in central midline areas measured using electroencephalography (EEG) can be explained by a similar sensory transformation as muscle activity but at a delay consistent with its role in a transcortical loop driving later cortical contributions to balance-correcting muscle activity. These results demonstrate that a neuromechanical model of muscle activity can be used to infer cortical contributions to muscle activity without recording brain activity. Our model may provide a useful framework for evaluating changes in cortical contributions to balance that are associated with falls in older adults and in neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease.","PeriodicalId":49688,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"170 4","pages":"e1011562"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the cortex in shaping automatic whole-body motor behaviors such as walking and balance is poorly understood. Gait and balance are typically mediated through subcortical circuits, with the cortex becoming engaged as needed on an individual basis by task difficulty and complexity. However, we lack a mechanistic understanding of how increased cortical contribution to whole-body movements shapes motor output. Here we use reactive balance recovery as a paradigm to identify relationships between hierarchical control mechanisms and their engagement across balance tasks of increasing difficulty in young adults. We hypothesize that parallel sensorimotor feedback loops engaging subcortical and cortical circuits contribute to balance-correcting muscle activity, and that the involvement of cortical circuits increases with balance challenge. We decomposed balance-correcting muscle activity based on hypothesized subcortically- and cortically-mediated feedback components driven by similar sensory information, but with different loop delays. The initial balance-correcting muscle activity was engaged at all levels of balance difficulty. Its onset latency was consistent with subcortical sensorimotor loops observed in the lower limb. An even later, presumed, cortically-mediated burst of muscle activity became additionally engaged as balance task difficulty increased, at latencies consistent with longer transcortical sensorimotor loops. We further demonstrate that evoked cortical activity in central midline areas measured using electroencephalography (EEG) can be explained by a similar sensory transformation as muscle activity but at a delay consistent with its role in a transcortical loop driving later cortical contributions to balance-correcting muscle activity. These results demonstrate that a neuromechanical model of muscle activity can be used to infer cortical contributions to muscle activity without recording brain activity. Our model may provide a useful framework for evaluating changes in cortical contributions to balance that are associated with falls in older adults and in neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease.
大脑皮层对反应平衡过程中感觉运动反馈控制的精确贡献
人们对大脑皮层在塑造行走和平衡等全身自动运动行为中的作用知之甚少。步态和平衡通常是通过皮层下回路介导的,皮层会根据任务的难度和复杂程度按个体需要参与其中。然而,我们对大脑皮层对全身运动的贡献增加如何影响运动输出还缺乏机制上的了解。在这里,我们使用反应性平衡恢复作为范例,以确定分层控制机制之间的关系,以及它们在难度不断增加的青壮年平衡任务中的参与情况。我们假设,皮层下和皮层回路参与的平行感觉运动反馈回路有助于平衡校正肌肉活动,而皮层回路的参与程度会随着平衡挑战的增加而增加。我们根据假定的皮层下和皮层介导的反馈成分对平衡校正肌肉活动进行了分解,这些反馈成分由相似的感觉信息驱动,但环路延迟不同。最初的平衡校正肌肉活动在所有平衡难度下都会参与。其起始延迟与在下肢观察到的皮层下感觉运动环路一致。随着平衡任务难度的增加,由大脑皮层介导的肌肉活动会在更晚的时间爆发,其潜伏期与更长的跨皮层感觉运动环路一致。我们进一步证明,使用脑电图(EEG)测量的中央中线区域的诱发皮质活动可以用与肌肉活动类似的感觉转换来解释,但其延迟时间与它在跨皮质环路中的作用一致,该环路驱动大脑皮质为后来的平衡校正肌肉活动做出贡献。这些结果表明,肌肉活动的神经机械模型可用于推断大脑皮层对肌肉活动的贡献,而无需记录大脑活动。我们的模型可以提供一个有用的框架,用于评估与老年人跌倒和帕金森病等神经系统疾病相关的大脑皮层对平衡贡献的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信