Checklist and guidance on creating codelists for electronic health records research

J. Matthewman, Kirsty Andresen, Anne Suffel, Liang-Yu Lin, Anna Schultze, J. Tazare, K. Bhaskaran, Elizabeth Williamson, R. Costello, Jennifer Quint, H. Strongman
{"title":"Checklist and guidance on creating codelists for electronic health records research","authors":"J. Matthewman, Kirsty Andresen, Anne Suffel, Liang-Yu Lin, Anna Schultze, J. Tazare, K. Bhaskaran, Elizabeth Williamson, R. Costello, Jennifer Quint, H. Strongman","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13550.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Codelists are required to extract meaningful information on characteristics and events from electronic health records (EHRs). EHR research relies on codelists to define study populations and variables, thus, trustworthy codelists are important. Here, we provide a checklist, in the style of commonly used reporting guidelines, to help researchers adhere to best practice in codelist development and sharing. Methods Based on a literature search and a workshop with experienced EHR researchers we created a set of recommendations that are 1. broadly applicable to different datasets, research questions, and methods of codelist creation; 2. easy to follow, implement and document by an individual researcher, and 3. fit within a step-by-step process. We then formatted these recommendations into a checklist. Results We have created a 9-step checklist, comprising 26 items, with accompanying guidance on each step. The checklist advises on which metadata to provide, how to define a clinical concept, how to identify and evaluate existing codelists, how to create new codelists, and how to review, finalise, and publish a created codelist. Conclusions Use of the checklist can reassure researchers that best practice was followed during the development of their codelists, increasing trust in research that relies on these codelists and facilitating wider re-use and adaptation by other researchers.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"220 S712","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13550.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Codelists are required to extract meaningful information on characteristics and events from electronic health records (EHRs). EHR research relies on codelists to define study populations and variables, thus, trustworthy codelists are important. Here, we provide a checklist, in the style of commonly used reporting guidelines, to help researchers adhere to best practice in codelist development and sharing. Methods Based on a literature search and a workshop with experienced EHR researchers we created a set of recommendations that are 1. broadly applicable to different datasets, research questions, and methods of codelist creation; 2. easy to follow, implement and document by an individual researcher, and 3. fit within a step-by-step process. We then formatted these recommendations into a checklist. Results We have created a 9-step checklist, comprising 26 items, with accompanying guidance on each step. The checklist advises on which metadata to provide, how to define a clinical concept, how to identify and evaluate existing codelists, how to create new codelists, and how to review, finalise, and publish a created codelist. Conclusions Use of the checklist can reassure researchers that best practice was followed during the development of their codelists, increasing trust in research that relies on these codelists and facilitating wider re-use and adaptation by other researchers.
为电子健康记录研究创建代码表的清单和指南
背景 要从电子健康记录 (EHR) 中提取有意义的特征和事件信息,就需要编码表。电子健康记录研究依赖于代码表来定义研究人群和变量,因此值得信赖的代码表非常重要。在此,我们按照常用报告指南的风格提供了一份核对表,以帮助研究人员在开发和共享代码表时遵循最佳实践。方法 基于文献检索和与经验丰富的电子病历研究人员的研讨会,我们创建了一套建议:1. 广泛适用于不同的数据集、研究问题和代码表创建方法;2. 易于单个研究人员遵循、实施和记录;3. 适合逐步进行的流程。然后,我们将这些建议格式化为一份核对表。结果 我们创建了一份包含 26 个项目的 9 步核对表,并为每个步骤提供了相应的指导。核对表建议提供哪些元数据、如何定义临床概念、如何识别和评估现有的代码表、如何创建新的代码表以及如何审核、最终确定和发布创建的代码表。结论 使用核对表可以让研究人员放心,他们在制定代码表时遵循了最佳实践,从而提高了依赖这些代码表进行的研究的可信度,并促进了其他研究人员更广泛地重复使用和调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信