Assessment of spring broad wheat varieties and lines for drought resistance in the conditions of the southern foreststeppe of Western Siberia using drought resistance indices

N. A. Yakunina, N. A. Pololzukhina, Y. Parshutkin
{"title":"Assessment of spring broad wheat varieties and lines for drought resistance in the conditions of the southern foreststeppe of Western Siberia using drought resistance indices","authors":"N. A. Yakunina, N. A. Pololzukhina, Y. Parshutkin","doi":"10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-178-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experimental part of the work was carried out based on the seed production department of the Omsk Agrarian Research Center in 2020-2022. Breeding lines of spring soft wheat were represented by three ripeness groups: mid-early – G 6/17, G 8/17, G 10/17; mid-season - G 7/17, G 15/17, G 16/17 and mid-late - G 11/17, G 14/17, G 17/17. The varieties Pamyati Azieva, Duet, and Element 22 were standard. A complex system of indices was used to evaluate the samples for drought resistance, based on comparison of yields under stressful and favorable conditions. The most common indices were calculated: average productivity (MP), endurance index (TOL), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and stress intolerance index (STI). The total rank score for all indices was calculated. Based on estimating a set of drought resistance indices, five samples with the highest number of points were identified: G 6/17, G 7/17, G10/17, G 11/17, and G 15/17, which can be used in further selection. The calculation of correlation coefficients revealed a high positive relationship between average productivity and the stress tolerance index (0.99), as well as the yield stability index (0.73), between the endurance index and the drought resistance index (0.89). A close positive relationship was also established between the stability and stress tolerance indexes (0.76), indicating a relatively high reliability.","PeriodicalId":124451,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-178-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experimental part of the work was carried out based on the seed production department of the Omsk Agrarian Research Center in 2020-2022. Breeding lines of spring soft wheat were represented by three ripeness groups: mid-early – G 6/17, G 8/17, G 10/17; mid-season - G 7/17, G 15/17, G 16/17 and mid-late - G 11/17, G 14/17, G 17/17. The varieties Pamyati Azieva, Duet, and Element 22 were standard. A complex system of indices was used to evaluate the samples for drought resistance, based on comparison of yields under stressful and favorable conditions. The most common indices were calculated: average productivity (MP), endurance index (TOL), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and stress intolerance index (STI). The total rank score for all indices was calculated. Based on estimating a set of drought resistance indices, five samples with the highest number of points were identified: G 6/17, G 7/17, G10/17, G 11/17, and G 15/17, which can be used in further selection. The calculation of correlation coefficients revealed a high positive relationship between average productivity and the stress tolerance index (0.99), as well as the yield stability index (0.73), between the endurance index and the drought resistance index (0.89). A close positive relationship was also established between the stability and stress tolerance indexes (0.76), indicating a relatively high reliability.
利用抗旱指数评估西西伯利亚南部森林草原条件下的春宽麦品种和品系的抗旱性
2020-2022 年,在鄂木斯克农业研究中心种子生产部的基础上开展了试验工作。春软麦育种品系分为三个成熟度组:早熟中期 - G 6/17、G 8/17、G 10/17;中熟 - G 7/17、G 15/17、G 16/17;晚熟中期 - G 11/17、G 14/17、G 17/17。Pamyati Azieva、Duet 和 Element 22 是标准品种。根据压力和有利条件下的产量比较,采用了一套复杂的指数系统来评估样品的抗旱性。最常用的指数包括:平均生产力(MP)、耐力指数(TOL)、产量稳定指数(YSI)、抗旱指数(DI)和不耐压指数(STI)。计算所有指数的总排名得分。在估算抗旱指数的基础上,确定了五个得分最高的样本:G 6/17、G 7/17、G 10/17、G 11/17 和 G 15/17,可用于进一步筛选。相关系数的计算表明,平均生产力与抗逆性指数(0.99)、产量稳定性指数(0.73)、耐力指数与抗旱性指数(0.89)之间存在高度正相关。稳定性指数和抗逆性指数之间也建立了密切的正相关关系(0.76),表明可靠性相对较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信