{"title":"Dewey and Bentley’s Knowing and the Known","authors":"Laurence Heglar","doi":"10.1163/18758185-bja10080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe book that Dewey co-authored with Arthur Bentley, Knowing and the Known, has long resisted coherent interpretation in relation to his previous work. This article suggests that we look at his work from a methodological rather than a metaphysical point of view. This requires looking first at what he was doing with his concepts and only secondly to their content. The whole purpose of his philosophy was to construct an account which, when used, would draw our attention to observable phenomena and have the consequence of promoting empirical inquiry.","PeriodicalId":42794,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Pragmatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Pragmatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-bja10080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The book that Dewey co-authored with Arthur Bentley, Knowing and the Known, has long resisted coherent interpretation in relation to his previous work. This article suggests that we look at his work from a methodological rather than a metaphysical point of view. This requires looking first at what he was doing with his concepts and only secondly to their content. The whole purpose of his philosophy was to construct an account which, when used, would draw our attention to observable phenomena and have the consequence of promoting empirical inquiry.
杜威与阿瑟-本特利(Arthur Bentley)合著的《认识与被认识》(Knowing and the Known)一书,长期以来一直无法与他之前的作品进行连贯的阐释。本文建议我们从方法论而非形而上学的角度来审视他的著作。这就要求我们首先关注他使用概念的目的,其次才是概念的内容。他的哲学的整个目的是构建一种解释,这种解释在使用时会引起我们对可观察现象的注意,并产生促进实证探索的结果。