{"title":"Natural Death and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Living Beings","authors":"Lorenzo Zemolin","doi":"10.1515/apeiron-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to most interpreters, Aristotle explains death as the result of material processes of the body going against the nature of the living being. Yet, this description is incomplete, for it does not clarify the relationship between the process of decay and the teleological system in which it occurs: this makes it impossible to distinguish between natural and violent death. In this paper, I try to fill this gap by looking at his so-called ‘biological works’ and mainly at the De Juventute. I first introduce the specific concept of life at play in this treatise and prove its complementarity with the framework of the De Anima. Then, I illustrate in detail the process of dying and the reasons why a merely material description is insufficient to account for the distinction between natural and violent death. Finally, I show that for Aristotle natural death is a by-product of teleologically directed life activities: only against the background of this teleological structure is natural death fully explained in terms of essence and causes. To support this claim, I compare death to two analogous cases in Aristotle’s biology, namely dreams and the features of GA V.","PeriodicalId":517049,"journal":{"name":"Apeiron","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apeiron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to most interpreters, Aristotle explains death as the result of material processes of the body going against the nature of the living being. Yet, this description is incomplete, for it does not clarify the relationship between the process of decay and the teleological system in which it occurs: this makes it impossible to distinguish between natural and violent death. In this paper, I try to fill this gap by looking at his so-called ‘biological works’ and mainly at the De Juventute. I first introduce the specific concept of life at play in this treatise and prove its complementarity with the framework of the De Anima. Then, I illustrate in detail the process of dying and the reasons why a merely material description is insufficient to account for the distinction between natural and violent death. Finally, I show that for Aristotle natural death is a by-product of teleologically directed life activities: only against the background of this teleological structure is natural death fully explained in terms of essence and causes. To support this claim, I compare death to two analogous cases in Aristotle’s biology, namely dreams and the features of GA V.
根据大多数解释者的观点,亚里士多德将死亡解释为身体的物质过程违背生命本质的结果。然而,这种描述并不完整,因为它没有阐明衰变过程与发生衰变的目的论体系之间的关系:这使得我们无法区分自然死亡和暴力死亡。在本文中,我试图通过研究他的所谓 "生物学著作",主要是《德-尤文图特》,来填补这一空白。我首先介绍了这篇论文中具体的生命概念,并证明了它与《生命论》框架的互补性。然后,我详细说明了死亡的过程,以及仅仅用物质描述不足以解释自然死亡和暴力死亡之间区别的原因。最后,我表明,对亚里士多德来说,自然死亡是目的论指导的生命活动的副产品:只有在这种目的论结构的背景下,自然死亡才能从本质和原因的角度得到充分的解释。为了支持这一主张,我将死亡与亚里士多德生物学中的两个类似情况进行了比较,即梦境和 GA V 的特征。