Natural Death and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Living Beings

Apeiron Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1515/apeiron-2024-0012
Lorenzo Zemolin
{"title":"Natural Death and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Living Beings","authors":"Lorenzo Zemolin","doi":"10.1515/apeiron-2024-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to most interpreters, Aristotle explains death as the result of material processes of the body going against the nature of the living being. Yet, this description is incomplete, for it does not clarify the relationship between the process of decay and the teleological system in which it occurs: this makes it impossible to distinguish between natural and violent death. In this paper, I try to fill this gap by looking at his so-called ‘biological works’ and mainly at the De Juventute. I first introduce the specific concept of life at play in this treatise and prove its complementarity with the framework of the De Anima. Then, I illustrate in detail the process of dying and the reasons why a merely material description is insufficient to account for the distinction between natural and violent death. Finally, I show that for Aristotle natural death is a by-product of teleologically directed life activities: only against the background of this teleological structure is natural death fully explained in terms of essence and causes. To support this claim, I compare death to two analogous cases in Aristotle’s biology, namely dreams and the features of GA V.","PeriodicalId":517049,"journal":{"name":"Apeiron","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apeiron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2024-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to most interpreters, Aristotle explains death as the result of material processes of the body going against the nature of the living being. Yet, this description is incomplete, for it does not clarify the relationship between the process of decay and the teleological system in which it occurs: this makes it impossible to distinguish between natural and violent death. In this paper, I try to fill this gap by looking at his so-called ‘biological works’ and mainly at the De Juventute. I first introduce the specific concept of life at play in this treatise and prove its complementarity with the framework of the De Anima. Then, I illustrate in detail the process of dying and the reasons why a merely material description is insufficient to account for the distinction between natural and violent death. Finally, I show that for Aristotle natural death is a by-product of teleologically directed life activities: only against the background of this teleological structure is natural death fully explained in terms of essence and causes. To support this claim, I compare death to two analogous cases in Aristotle’s biology, namely dreams and the features of GA V.
亚里士多德生命科学中的自然死亡与目的论
根据大多数解释者的观点,亚里士多德将死亡解释为身体的物质过程违背生命本质的结果。然而,这种描述并不完整,因为它没有阐明衰变过程与发生衰变的目的论体系之间的关系:这使得我们无法区分自然死亡和暴力死亡。在本文中,我试图通过研究他的所谓 "生物学著作",主要是《德-尤文图特》,来填补这一空白。我首先介绍了这篇论文中具体的生命概念,并证明了它与《生命论》框架的互补性。然后,我详细说明了死亡的过程,以及仅仅用物质描述不足以解释自然死亡和暴力死亡之间区别的原因。最后,我表明,对亚里士多德来说,自然死亡是目的论指导的生命活动的副产品:只有在这种目的论结构的背景下,自然死亡才能从本质和原因的角度得到充分的解释。为了支持这一主张,我将死亡与亚里士多德生物学中的两个类似情况进行了比较,即梦境和 GA V 的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信