Whether the late dark energy parameterization can reconcile the Hubble tension?

Mingjian Zhang, Li Chen, Maoyou Yang, Junmei Wang
{"title":"Whether the late dark energy parameterization can reconcile the Hubble tension?","authors":"Mingjian Zhang, Li Chen, Maoyou Yang, Junmei Wang","doi":"10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we construct ten dark energy models to test whether they can reconcile the Hubble tension and how much is it affected by parameterization. To provide a fair test, the models are rich including fractional form, logarithm form, exponential form, inverse exponential form and several non-parameterized models. The dataset we use are the NPIPE pipeline of cosmic microwave background (CMB) power-spectrum data from \\pl2020, Pantheon+ samples from Supernovae Type Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillation. They MCMC calculation implies the dark energy transferring from $w< -1$ to $w > -1$, for the four parameterized dark energy models. However, they are unable to reconcile the Hubble tension well. Importantly, we find that the phantom-like dark energy with $w < -1$ best can reduce the Hubble tension to $0.1808\\sigma$. However, the AIC analysis indicates that this alleviation is at the cost of high AIC. We also investigate the effect of constructions on the derivative of equation of state $dw/da$, cosmic density parameter, CMB power spectrum $C^{TT}$ and matter spectra $P(k)$. We also find that Hubble tension may be related to the reionization process.","PeriodicalId":504778,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Physics C","volume":" 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Physics C","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad3f95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we construct ten dark energy models to test whether they can reconcile the Hubble tension and how much is it affected by parameterization. To provide a fair test, the models are rich including fractional form, logarithm form, exponential form, inverse exponential form and several non-parameterized models. The dataset we use are the NPIPE pipeline of cosmic microwave background (CMB) power-spectrum data from \pl2020, Pantheon+ samples from Supernovae Type Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillation. They MCMC calculation implies the dark energy transferring from $w< -1$ to $w > -1$, for the four parameterized dark energy models. However, they are unable to reconcile the Hubble tension well. Importantly, we find that the phantom-like dark energy with $w < -1$ best can reduce the Hubble tension to $0.1808\sigma$. However, the AIC analysis indicates that this alleviation is at the cost of high AIC. We also investigate the effect of constructions on the derivative of equation of state $dw/da$, cosmic density parameter, CMB power spectrum $C^{TT}$ and matter spectra $P(k)$. We also find that Hubble tension may be related to the reionization process.
后期暗能量参数化能否调和哈勃张力?
在本文中,我们构建了十个暗能量模型,以检验它们是否能调和哈勃张力,以及参数化对其影响有多大。为了提供一个公平的测试,模型的形式非常丰富,包括分数形式、对数形式、指数形式、反指数形式和几个非参数化模型。我们使用的数据集是来自pl2020的宇宙微波背景(CMB)功率谱数据的NPIPE管道、来自Ia型超新星的Pantheon+样本以及重子声振荡。他们的MCMC计算暗示,对于四个参数化暗能量模型,暗能量从$w<-1$转移到$w>-1$。然而,他们无法很好地协调哈勃张力。重要的是,我们发现w<-1$的幽灵般的暗能量最能把哈勃张力降低到0.1808/sigma$。然而,AIC分析表明,这种缓解是以高AIC为代价的。我们还研究了构造对状态方程导数$dw/da$、宇宙密度参数、CMB功率谱$C^{TT}$和物质谱$P(k)$的影响。我们还发现哈勃张力可能与再电离过程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信