Analysis of corrections of upper-case/lower-case initials in the Šolar and Lektor corpora

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Jezik in Slovstvo Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.4312/aemz1104
Vesna Žnidar
{"title":"Analysis of corrections of upper-case/lower-case initials in the Šolar and Lektor corpora","authors":"Vesna Žnidar","doi":"10.4312/aemz1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the role of orthographic norms in two types of non-authored text revision – text correction within the educational process and proofreading. Both the teacher and the proofreader intervene in the text in order to correct the deviations from the standard language norms: the teacher with the aim to develop the student's language (and stylistic) abilities, and the proofreader to ensure that the text complies with the standard language norms; in this paper the term correction is used for such interventions in the text. The specialized corpora Šolar and Lektor were used for the comparative analysis. As regards the corrections of upper-case/lower-case initials, there are 2,015 such corrections in the Šolar corpus where they represent a special category within spelling errors, while in the Lektor corpus there are 1,702 of those corrections and they are divided into six subtypes, which together overlap precisely with the category of upper-case and lower-case corrections in the Šolar corpus. They were used to create a typology of corrections from the Šolar corpus for the purposes of this paper. The aim of this paper is to present concrete spelling problems encountered by students and adult authors, and to examine how such errors are corrected by teachers and by proofreaders – whether they strictly adhere to codified orthographic norms, or whether deviations occur and in which cases. It was found that distinguishing between proper and common nouns causes the most problems. The paper represents a new approach in the study of language by connecting the field of developing students' language abilities and the field of proofreading.","PeriodicalId":52517,"journal":{"name":"Jezik in Slovstvo","volume":" 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezik in Slovstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/aemz1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the role of orthographic norms in two types of non-authored text revision – text correction within the educational process and proofreading. Both the teacher and the proofreader intervene in the text in order to correct the deviations from the standard language norms: the teacher with the aim to develop the student's language (and stylistic) abilities, and the proofreader to ensure that the text complies with the standard language norms; in this paper the term correction is used for such interventions in the text. The specialized corpora Šolar and Lektor were used for the comparative analysis. As regards the corrections of upper-case/lower-case initials, there are 2,015 such corrections in the Šolar corpus where they represent a special category within spelling errors, while in the Lektor corpus there are 1,702 of those corrections and they are divided into six subtypes, which together overlap precisely with the category of upper-case and lower-case corrections in the Šolar corpus. They were used to create a typology of corrections from the Šolar corpus for the purposes of this paper. The aim of this paper is to present concrete spelling problems encountered by students and adult authors, and to examine how such errors are corrected by teachers and by proofreaders – whether they strictly adhere to codified orthographic norms, or whether deviations occur and in which cases. It was found that distinguishing between proper and common nouns causes the most problems. The paper represents a new approach in the study of language by connecting the field of developing students' language abilities and the field of proofreading.
对《Šolar》和《Lektor》语料库中大写/小写首字母更正的分析
本文探讨了正字法规范在两种非著作文本修改中的作用--教育过程中的文本校正和校对。教师和校对者都会对文本进行干预,以纠正偏离标准语言规范的地方:教师的目的是培养学生的语言(和文体)能力,校对者的目的是确保文本符合标准语言规范;在本文中,"校正 "一词用于指对文本的这种干预。比较分析使用了专业语料库 Šolar 和 Lektor。关于大写/小写首字母的更正,在 Šolar 语料库中有 2,015 个此类更正,它们是拼写错误中的一个特殊类别,而在 Lektor 语料库中有 1,702 个此类更正,它们被分为六个子类型,这些子类型与 Šolar 语料库中的大写和小写更正类别完全重叠。为了本文的目的,我们使用它们对Šolar 语料库中的更正进行了分类。本文旨在介绍学生和成人作者遇到的具体拼写问题,并研究教师和校对人员是如何纠正这些错误的--他们是否严格遵守成文的正字法规范,或是否出现偏差,以及在哪些情况下出现偏差。研究发现,区分专有名词和普通名词造成的问题最多。本文将培养学生语言能力的领域与校对领域联系起来,为语言研究提供了一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jezik in Slovstvo
Jezik in Slovstvo Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信