A Scaphoid Safety Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Reconstruction. The Non–Bone Tunnel Technique and Clinical Outcomes

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Panithan Tuntiyatorn, Chanakarn Rojpitipongsakorn, Kulapat Chulsomlee, Pongsakorn Pittayasoponkij, T. Kanchanathepsak, T. Tawonsawatruk
{"title":"A Scaphoid Safety Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Reconstruction. The Non–Bone Tunnel Technique and Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Panithan Tuntiyatorn, Chanakarn Rojpitipongsakorn, Kulapat Chulsomlee, Pongsakorn Pittayasoponkij, T. Kanchanathepsak, T. Tawonsawatruk","doi":"10.1097/bto.0000000000000665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In the chronic unrepairable scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury stage, scapholunate ligament (SL) reconstruction remains the gold standard treatment. However, most surgical techniques are required to make the bone tunnel by drilling through the scaphoid, which may introduce iatrogenic scaphoid fracture as a complication. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe an alternative surgical technique for SLIL reconstruction by using a double anchor suture instead of bone drilling.\n \n \n \n A total of 5 consecutive cases of chronic scapholunate dissociation that underwent the non–bone tunnel technique of SLIL reconstruction were included in the study. The clinical data between the preoperative and postoperative were collected.\n \n \n \n In 5 cases, a ligament reconstruction was achieved successfully. At 12 weeks after the surgery. The average Visual Analog Scale improved from 8.4 to 1.0. The clinical stress test was negative without pain. The mean grip strength improved to 85.4% compared with the normal contralateral hand. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 8.62 compared with the preoperative score of 70.92. Mean of SL interval in wrist with anteroposterior view and anteroposterior clenched fist view at 2.50 mm and 2.68 mm.\n \n \n \n The scaphoid safety SLIL reconstruction technique is a simple and reliable treatment method, using flexor carpi radialis tendon weave and anchor-ligament-anchor procedure instead of previous bone tunnel techniques. Biomechanical strength of the system demonstrated by postoperative results of scaphoid flexion was corrected, but SL gaps were still remaining in some cases. However, there was no effect on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.\n","PeriodicalId":45336,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bto.0000000000000665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the chronic unrepairable scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury stage, scapholunate ligament (SL) reconstruction remains the gold standard treatment. However, most surgical techniques are required to make the bone tunnel by drilling through the scaphoid, which may introduce iatrogenic scaphoid fracture as a complication. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe an alternative surgical technique for SLIL reconstruction by using a double anchor suture instead of bone drilling. A total of 5 consecutive cases of chronic scapholunate dissociation that underwent the non–bone tunnel technique of SLIL reconstruction were included in the study. The clinical data between the preoperative and postoperative were collected. In 5 cases, a ligament reconstruction was achieved successfully. At 12 weeks after the surgery. The average Visual Analog Scale improved from 8.4 to 1.0. The clinical stress test was negative without pain. The mean grip strength improved to 85.4% compared with the normal contralateral hand. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 8.62 compared with the preoperative score of 70.92. Mean of SL interval in wrist with anteroposterior view and anteroposterior clenched fist view at 2.50 mm and 2.68 mm. The scaphoid safety SLIL reconstruction technique is a simple and reliable treatment method, using flexor carpi radialis tendon weave and anchor-ligament-anchor procedure instead of previous bone tunnel techniques. Biomechanical strength of the system demonstrated by postoperative results of scaphoid flexion was corrected, but SL gaps were still remaining in some cases. However, there was no effect on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
肩胛骨安全肩胛骨间韧带重建术。无骨隧道技术和临床结果
在无法修复的肩胛骨骨间韧带(SLIL)慢性损伤阶段,肩胛骨韧带(SL)重建仍是治疗的金标准。然而,大多数手术技术都需要通过在肩胛骨上钻孔来制作骨隧道,这可能会引起先天性肩胛骨骨折这一并发症。因此,本研究旨在描述一种替代钻骨的手术技术,即使用双锚缝合技术重建 SLIL。 本研究共纳入了 5 例连续接受非骨隧道技术 SLIL 重建的慢性肩胛骨离断病例。研究收集了术前和术后的临床数据。 其中 5 例成功实现了韧带重建。术后 12 周视觉模拟量表的平均值从 8.4 降至 1.0。临床压力测试结果为阴性,无疼痛。与正常对侧手相比,平均握力提高到 85.4%。手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分的平均值为 8.62,而术前为 70.92。腕关节前正视图和握拳前正视图的SL间距平均值分别为2.50毫米和2.68毫米。 肩胛骨安全SLIL重建技术是一种简单可靠的治疗方法,它使用桡侧屈肌肌腱编织和锚-韧带-锚程序取代了以往的骨隧道技术。术后肩胛骨屈曲的结果表明,该系统的生物力学强度得到了纠正,但在某些病例中仍存在 SL 间隙。不过,对临床效果和患者满意度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The purpose of Techniques in Orthopaedics is to provide information on the latest orthopaedic procedure as they are devised and used by top orthopaedic surgeons. The approach is technique-oriented, covering operations, manipulations, and instruments being developed and applied in such as arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and trauma. Each issue is guest-edited by an expert in the field and devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信