Knowing rape: Turning ethnoracialized victims into moral citizens in post-apartheid South Africa

Sonia Rupcic
{"title":"Knowing rape: Turning ethnoracialized victims into moral citizens in post-apartheid South Africa","authors":"Sonia Rupcic","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In South Africa, a disparate coalition of law enforcement, human rights workers, health officials, and activists claim that women don't know they have been raped. Claims of misrecognition typically follow from the observation that most women who experience gendered violence in South Africa do not report to the police and are especially leveled at Black women living in rural areas under the judicial authority of customary leaders. This article examines this assertion about not knowing gendered violence and the interventions it inspired. Dwelling on the story of one survivor's search for justice in Thohoyandou, South Africa, I argue that in the years following the transition from apartheid to democracy, a consensus coalesced around Black Indigenous women, who were seen as key political agents in post-colonial nation-building. During this time, knowing rape was touted as a gendered civic duty, one that enacted moral citizenship for the sake of a more orderly, democratic and vigorous multicultural nation. In spite of the consensus around knowing rape, “rape,” I suggest, remains an ambivalent sign for both those who encourage its recognition and for survivors. Amidst these disjunctures, survivors’ demands for justice often go denied.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South Africa, a disparate coalition of law enforcement, human rights workers, health officials, and activists claim that women don't know they have been raped. Claims of misrecognition typically follow from the observation that most women who experience gendered violence in South Africa do not report to the police and are especially leveled at Black women living in rural areas under the judicial authority of customary leaders. This article examines this assertion about not knowing gendered violence and the interventions it inspired. Dwelling on the story of one survivor's search for justice in Thohoyandou, South Africa, I argue that in the years following the transition from apartheid to democracy, a consensus coalesced around Black Indigenous women, who were seen as key political agents in post-colonial nation-building. During this time, knowing rape was touted as a gendered civic duty, one that enacted moral citizenship for the sake of a more orderly, democratic and vigorous multicultural nation. In spite of the consensus around knowing rape, “rape,” I suggest, remains an ambivalent sign for both those who encourage its recognition and for survivors. Amidst these disjunctures, survivors’ demands for justice often go denied.

了解强奸:在种族隔离后的南非,将种族化的受害者变成有道德的公民
在南非,由执法人员、人权工作者、卫生官员和活动家组成的不同联盟声称,妇女不知道自己被强奸了。南非大多数遭受性别暴力的妇女都不会向警方报案,这种误认的说法通常是基于这种观察,尤其是针对生活在农村地区、受习俗领袖司法管辖的黑人妇女。本文探讨了这一关于不了解性别暴力的论断及其激发的干预措施。以南非托霍扬杜(Thohoyandou)的一位幸存者寻求正义的故事为中心,我认为在从种族隔离向民主过渡后的几年里,黑人土著妇女被视为后殖民国家建设的关键政治力量,在她们周围形成了一种共识。在此期间,"了解强奸 "被吹捧为一种性别化的公民义务,一种为了建立一个更加有序、民主和充满活力的多元文化国家而履行道德公民义务的义务。我认为,尽管人们对认识强奸达成了共识,但 "强奸 "对于那些鼓励承认强奸的人和幸存者来说,仍然是一个矛盾的符号。在这些矛盾中,幸存者对正义的要求往往被拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信