A cross-database bibliometrics analysis of blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. Ishmuradova, A. Chistyakov, A. D. Chudnovskiy, E. V. Grib, Sergey V. Kondrashev, Sergei P. Zhdanov
{"title":"A cross-database bibliometrics analysis of blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities","authors":"I. Ishmuradova, A. Chistyakov, A. D. Chudnovskiy, E. V. Grib, Sergey V. Kondrashev, Sergei P. Zhdanov","doi":"10.30935/cedtech/14478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study looks closely at research papers about blended learning (BL) from the last 10 years (2014-2023). It pulls information from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). By using both, it gives a full picture of what is being published and what’s important in BL research. The search found 1,704 articles in Scopus and 1,545 in WoS. After putting them together and removing duplicates, there were 2,455 articles for the study. The study used a Bibliometrix R to look at who published a lot, which countries and schools did most, who worked together, and which articles got mentioned a lot. Each year, the number of articles grew by about 15.58%. Most of these, 93.00%, were articles. Universities in Australia were among those that wrote the most. “Education and Information Technologies” and “International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education” were often cited, which shows they have big roles in this research area. Some of the main researchers who connect a lot of the work are Zhu, Graham, and Jackson. It is found that keywords “higher education”, “online learning”, “students”, and “COVID-19” are very common in discussions and help shape the research being done. While much research comes from Australia and the West, there is also growing work from Asia and the Middle East. This shows that BL is becoming important in different parts of the world. But there’s a chance to get more research from less wealthy countries. This study puts together a clear picture of BL research. It looks at what’s been published, who talks to who, and which places are doing the work. The research has grown who the main people are, where there’s a gap between different regions, and what we should think about for the future. This can help make policies and change how we teach.","PeriodicalId":37088,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study looks closely at research papers about blended learning (BL) from the last 10 years (2014-2023). It pulls information from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). By using both, it gives a full picture of what is being published and what’s important in BL research. The search found 1,704 articles in Scopus and 1,545 in WoS. After putting them together and removing duplicates, there were 2,455 articles for the study. The study used a Bibliometrix R to look at who published a lot, which countries and schools did most, who worked together, and which articles got mentioned a lot. Each year, the number of articles grew by about 15.58%. Most of these, 93.00%, were articles. Universities in Australia were among those that wrote the most. “Education and Information Technologies” and “International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education” were often cited, which shows they have big roles in this research area. Some of the main researchers who connect a lot of the work are Zhu, Graham, and Jackson. It is found that keywords “higher education”, “online learning”, “students”, and “COVID-19” are very common in discussions and help shape the research being done. While much research comes from Australia and the West, there is also growing work from Asia and the Middle East. This shows that BL is becoming important in different parts of the world. But there’s a chance to get more research from less wealthy countries. This study puts together a clear picture of BL research. It looks at what’s been published, who talks to who, and which places are doing the work. The research has grown who the main people are, where there’s a gap between different regions, and what we should think about for the future. This can help make policies and change how we teach.
高等教育混合式学习的跨数据库文献计量学分析:趋势与能力
本研究密切关注过去 10 年(2014-2023 年)有关混合式学习(BL)的研究论文。它从 Scopus 和 Web of Science (WoS) 中获取信息。通过同时使用这两个系统,可以全面了解混合式学习研究的发表情况和重要意义。这次搜索在 Scopus 和 WoS 中分别发现了 1,704 篇和 1,545 篇文章。将它们放在一起并去除重复内容后,共有 2455 篇文章可供研究使用。该研究使用 Bibliometrix R 来查看哪些人发表了大量文章,哪些国家和学校发表的文章最多,哪些人一起工作,哪些文章被频繁提及。文章数量每年增长约 15.58%。其中大部分(93.00%)是文章。澳大利亚的大学撰写的文章最多。"教育与信息技术》和《高等教育教育技术国际期刊》经常被引用,这表明它们在这一研究领域发挥着重要作用。朱(Zhu)、格雷厄姆(Graham)和杰克逊(Jackson)是连接大量工作的主要研究者。我们发现,"高等教育"、"在线学习"、"学生 "和 "COVID-19 "等关键词在讨论中非常常见,有助于形成正在进行的研究。虽然许多研究来自澳大利亚和西方,但亚洲和中东的研究也在不断增加。这表明,BL 在世界不同地区正变得越来越重要。但是,我们有机会从不富裕的国家获得更多的研究成果。这项研究清楚地描绘了基本法研究的全貌。它审视了已发表的研究成果、谁在与谁交谈以及哪些地方在开展这项工作。研究发现了谁是主要研究人员,不同地区之间的差距在哪里,以及我们应该为未来做些什么。这有助于制定政策和改变我们的教学方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Technology
Contemporary Educational Technology Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信