Corporate Transformation, Income Inequality, and Consumer Commodity Choice: The Economic Cycle in the Rise and Fall of Industries

Huan Yang
{"title":"Corporate Transformation, Income Inequality, and Consumer Commodity Choice: The Economic Cycle in the Rise and Fall of Industries","authors":"Huan Yang","doi":"10.22158/jepf.v10n2p71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a multi-industry closed economy with constant productivity, this paper innovatively constructs an inter-industry transformation mechanism, and find the clustering behavior of enterprises transforming according to the industry prosperity will lead to the inter-industry evolution, which will lead to the fluctuation of the business cycle. We also find that the extreme boom/bust of a single industry will greatly increase the degree of income inequality, and when the industrial pattern composed of the development of different industries is in a balanced state, income inequality is at the lowest point of the economic cycle; At the same time, on the demand side of economic operation, we apply the heterogeneous commodity selection theory of utility maximization in classical economics to the household sector with two consumption preferences (high-grade and ordinary) for the first time, and finds that the implementation of diversified commodity basket subsidies for households in need of relief will promote the improvement of total social utility. This is the strong false evidence of the utilitarian view of social welfare; Finally, we study the government's attitude towards enterprise transformation, allowing the government to adjust the industrial structure of the economy by imposing macro-restrictions on the minimum number of companies in a single industry. It finds that enterprise transformation under excessive restrictions will lead to the failure of the market mechanism, making it impossible to rationally allocate production resources among industries, resulting in low GDP and low social utility. The extremely loose transformation supervision will have a profit impact on the high-end goods industry.","PeriodicalId":73718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics and public finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics and public finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v10n2p71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a multi-industry closed economy with constant productivity, this paper innovatively constructs an inter-industry transformation mechanism, and find the clustering behavior of enterprises transforming according to the industry prosperity will lead to the inter-industry evolution, which will lead to the fluctuation of the business cycle. We also find that the extreme boom/bust of a single industry will greatly increase the degree of income inequality, and when the industrial pattern composed of the development of different industries is in a balanced state, income inequality is at the lowest point of the economic cycle; At the same time, on the demand side of economic operation, we apply the heterogeneous commodity selection theory of utility maximization in classical economics to the household sector with two consumption preferences (high-grade and ordinary) for the first time, and finds that the implementation of diversified commodity basket subsidies for households in need of relief will promote the improvement of total social utility. This is the strong false evidence of the utilitarian view of social welfare; Finally, we study the government's attitude towards enterprise transformation, allowing the government to adjust the industrial structure of the economy by imposing macro-restrictions on the minimum number of companies in a single industry. It finds that enterprise transformation under excessive restrictions will lead to the failure of the market mechanism, making it impossible to rationally allocate production resources among industries, resulting in low GDP and low social utility. The extremely loose transformation supervision will have a profit impact on the high-end goods industry.
企业转型、收入不平等与消费者的商品选择:产业兴衰中的经济周期
在生产率恒定的多产业封闭经济中,本文创新性地构建了产业间转化机制,发现根据产业景气度转化的企业集聚行为将导致产业间演化,进而引发商业周期的波动。同时,在经济运行的需求侧,我们首次将古典经济学中效用最大化的异质商品选择理论应用于具有两种消费偏好(高档和普通)的家庭部门,发现对困难家庭实施多样化的商品篮子补贴将促进社会总效用的提高。这是功利主义社会福利观的有力假证;最后,我们研究了政府对企业转型的态度,允许政府通过对单一行业最低企业数量的宏观限制来调整经济的产业结构。研究发现,过度限制下的企业转型会导致市场机制失灵,使生产资源无法在产业间合理配置,造成低 GDP 和低社会效用。极度宽松的转型监管将对高端产品行业的利润产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信