Haven or hell? A perspective on the ecology of offshore oil and gas platforms

Irene S. Fortune, Alethea S. Madgett, Ann Scarborough Bull, Natalie Hicks, Milton S. Love, David M. Paterson
{"title":"Haven or hell? A perspective on the ecology of offshore oil and gas platforms","authors":"Irene S. Fortune, Alethea S. Madgett, Ann Scarborough Bull, Natalie Hicks, Milton S. Love, David M. Paterson","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Offshore oil and gas platforms (OGP) have been installed worldwide and initially with limited consideration given to the nature of their positive or negative long-term interactions with the natural marine habitats. However, as OGP reach the end of their useful life, with many being decommissioned and removed, it is timely to review the growing evidence of the association of marine biota with OGP to provide a summary and synthesis for policy makers and to give insight to decisions in increasingly crowded marine spatial plans. In the last decade, there has been rapid increase in studies concerning the ecological role of OGP. This research reveals strong contextual difference between platforms in different geographical regions, but all OGP add to local biodiversity particularly where hard substrata are introduced to areas dominated by depositional (mud and sand) habitats. This includes the attraction and increased productivity of fish, sessile invertebrates, and algae while also affecting change in the benthic habitats beneath platforms. There also evidence of the OGP changing local hydrodynamics conditions with effects on phytoplankton and local scour. In terms of the biota associated with OGP, water depth is a major driver of community type across systems. This study emphasises that while knowledge of OGP communities and species has improved, there are still significant knowledge gaps that may prevent the most environmentally beneficial decisions being made around decommissioning. There are few studies following the effect of decommissioning (topping, toppling, or removal) on the ecology of the systems as they change with time (longitudinal research) for the decommissioning event. There is also a need for more studies comparing the biodiversity and functionality of OGP system to artificial and natural reefs and habitats to better understand the ecological cost-benefit of decommissioning scenarios. Finally, commercial data is often unavailable and even when available, surveys are often conducted using varied methodology that prevents comparative analysis. By imposing/agreeing standards and sharing data around the ecological cost-benefit of decommissioning strategies, improve policy guidance concerning OGP planning, and management might emerge.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore oil and gas platforms (OGP) have been installed worldwide and initially with limited consideration given to the nature of their positive or negative long-term interactions with the natural marine habitats. However, as OGP reach the end of their useful life, with many being decommissioned and removed, it is timely to review the growing evidence of the association of marine biota with OGP to provide a summary and synthesis for policy makers and to give insight to decisions in increasingly crowded marine spatial plans. In the last decade, there has been rapid increase in studies concerning the ecological role of OGP. This research reveals strong contextual difference between platforms in different geographical regions, but all OGP add to local biodiversity particularly where hard substrata are introduced to areas dominated by depositional (mud and sand) habitats. This includes the attraction and increased productivity of fish, sessile invertebrates, and algae while also affecting change in the benthic habitats beneath platforms. There also evidence of the OGP changing local hydrodynamics conditions with effects on phytoplankton and local scour. In terms of the biota associated with OGP, water depth is a major driver of community type across systems. This study emphasises that while knowledge of OGP communities and species has improved, there are still significant knowledge gaps that may prevent the most environmentally beneficial decisions being made around decommissioning. There are few studies following the effect of decommissioning (topping, toppling, or removal) on the ecology of the systems as they change with time (longitudinal research) for the decommissioning event. There is also a need for more studies comparing the biodiversity and functionality of OGP system to artificial and natural reefs and habitats to better understand the ecological cost-benefit of decommissioning scenarios. Finally, commercial data is often unavailable and even when available, surveys are often conducted using varied methodology that prevents comparative analysis. By imposing/agreeing standards and sharing data around the ecological cost-benefit of decommissioning strategies, improve policy guidance concerning OGP planning, and management might emerge.
天堂还是地狱?海上油气平台生态透视
近海石油和天然气平台(OGP)已在世界各地安装,最初对其与自然海洋生境的长期积极或消极相互作用的性质考虑有限。然而,随着 OGP 的使用寿命即将结束,许多 OGP 正在退役和拆除,现在是审查海洋生物区系与 OGP 关联性的越来越多的证据的时候了,以便为政策制定者提供总结和综述,并为日益拥挤的海洋空间规划中的决策提供见解。在过去十年中,有关海洋地质公园生态作用的研究迅速增加。这些研究表明,不同地理区域的平台之间存在很大的环境差异,但所有的海洋地质公园都增加了当地的生物多样性,特别是在以沉积(泥和沙)生境为主的区域引入硬底层的情况下。这包括吸引鱼类、无柄无脊椎动物和藻类并提高其生产力,同时还影响平台下方底栖生境的变化。还有证据表明,海洋地质公园改变了当地的水动力条件,对浮游植物和当地冲刷产生了影响。就与奥戈帕有关的生物群而言,水深是各系统群落类型的主要驱动因素。这项研究强调,虽然对奥戈帕群落和物种的了解有所提高,但仍然存在重大的知识差距,这可能会妨碍围绕退役问题做出最有益于环境的决策。很少有研究跟踪退役(封顶、推倒或移除)对系统生态的影响,因为它们会随着时间的推移而变化(纵向研究)。还需要开展更多的研究,将海洋地质公园系统的生物多样性和功能与人工和天然珊瑚礁及栖息地进行比较,以更好地了解退役方案的生态成本效益。最后,商业数据往往不可用,即使有,调查也往往采用不同的方法,无法进行比较分析。通过围绕退役战略的生态成本效益制定/商定标准和共享数据,可以改进有关海洋地质公园规划和管理的政策指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信