Use of Social Media and Free Open Access Medicine (FOAM) for Continuing Education in Emergency Nursing: A Scoping Review

Francis Tenorio, Emma Siegmund, Rebecca Oxland, Jonathan Sherbino, Teresa M. Chan
{"title":"Use of Social Media and Free Open Access Medicine (FOAM) for Continuing Education in Emergency Nursing: A Scoping Review","authors":"Francis Tenorio, Emma Siegmund, Rebecca Oxland, Jonathan Sherbino, Teresa M. Chan","doi":"10.29173/cjen220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Emergency nurses are responsible for ensuring that they have up-to-date knowledge and skills to deal with any situation that may present in clinical practice. As an emerging trend for learners to obtain and discuss evidence-based medical education, social media, Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) and Free Open Access Nursing education (FOAN) could be used for continuing education in emergency nursing. This scoping review aims to discover what is known about social media and FOAM in continuous emergency nursing education.\nMethods: This scoping review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The review searched three databases (Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science) for any paper that discussed social media or FOAM in the context of continuing education in either general or emergency nursing published in any year. Of the 346 records screened, 12 studies were reviewed for their description of social media for continuing education use and any reported challenges or outcomes.\nResults: The current state of literature is limited in describing the use of social media with continuing education specifically in emergency nursing. Rather than as a primary educational intervention, social media has been used to enhance other educational strategies or as in-the-moment forms of learning. Studies that utilized social media showed favorability to its use, but there were often challenges to the methodology of these studies. Despite papers describing the elements of FOAM, papers within the nursing literature did not use this term.\nConclusion: Although the literature on social media in emergency and general nursing literature is growing, it is superficial and broad. More studies are needed to see the overall effects of social media in continuing education in emergency nursing.\nKeywords: continuing education, emergency nursing, nursing education, social media.","PeriodicalId":377763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/cjen220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emergency nurses are responsible for ensuring that they have up-to-date knowledge and skills to deal with any situation that may present in clinical practice. As an emerging trend for learners to obtain and discuss evidence-based medical education, social media, Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) and Free Open Access Nursing education (FOAN) could be used for continuing education in emergency nursing. This scoping review aims to discover what is known about social media and FOAM in continuous emergency nursing education. Methods: This scoping review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The review searched three databases (Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science) for any paper that discussed social media or FOAM in the context of continuing education in either general or emergency nursing published in any year. Of the 346 records screened, 12 studies were reviewed for their description of social media for continuing education use and any reported challenges or outcomes. Results: The current state of literature is limited in describing the use of social media with continuing education specifically in emergency nursing. Rather than as a primary educational intervention, social media has been used to enhance other educational strategies or as in-the-moment forms of learning. Studies that utilized social media showed favorability to its use, but there were often challenges to the methodology of these studies. Despite papers describing the elements of FOAM, papers within the nursing literature did not use this term. Conclusion: Although the literature on social media in emergency and general nursing literature is growing, it is superficial and broad. More studies are needed to see the overall effects of social media in continuing education in emergency nursing. Keywords: continuing education, emergency nursing, nursing education, social media.
利用社交媒体和免费开放获取医学 (FOAM) 开展急诊护理继续教育:范围审查
目的:急诊护士有责任确保自己掌握最新的知识和技能,以应对临床实践中可能出现的任何情况。作为学习者获取和讨论循证医学教育的新兴趋势,社交媒体、免费开放医学教育(FOAM)和免费开放护理教育(FOAN)可用于急诊护理的继续教育。本范围界定综述旨在了解社交媒体和免费开放式医学教育在急诊护理继续教育中的应用情况:本范围界定综述以《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目--范围界定综述扩展》(PRISMA-ScR)为指导。该综述检索了三个数据库(Medline、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)中任何一年发表的在普通或急救护理继续教育背景下讨论社交媒体或 FOAM 的论文。在筛选出的 346 条记录中,对 12 项研究进行了审查,以了解其对社交媒体在继续教育中的应用的描述,以及所报告的挑战或结果:结果:目前的文献对社交媒体在急诊护理继续教育中的应用描述有限。社交媒体不是主要的教育干预手段,而是用来加强其他教育策略或作为即时学习形式。利用社交媒体进行的研究表明,社交媒体的使用是有利的,但这些研究的方法往往面临挑战。尽管有论文描述了 FOAM 的要素,但护理文献中的论文并未使用这一术语:尽管有关急诊和普通护理文献中社交媒体的文献越来越多,但这些文献还很肤浅和宽泛。要了解社交媒体在急诊护理继续教育中的整体效果,还需要更多的研究。关键词:继续教育;急诊护理;护理教育;社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信