The institutional e-lending setup in Scandinavian libraries: logics in play in the eyes of library and policy actors

Maciej Liguzinski, Nanna Kann-Rasmussen
{"title":"The institutional e-lending setup in Scandinavian libraries: logics in play in the eyes of library and policy actors","authors":"Maciej Liguzinski, Nanna Kann-Rasmussen","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2023-0265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe article investigates the institutional setup of e-lending in public libraries in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Our point of departure is that e-lending has necessitated new library collaborations between local, regional and national levels, and therefore, institutional e-lending setups have emerged. The study seeks to provide better understanding of how the institutional setups are structured, how governance logics have shaped them and what tensions and dynamics become visible in the key actors’ problematisations of these setups.Design/methodology/approachThe study is situated in the neo-institutional tradition and applies the institutional logics perspective. The research questions are answered by taking a qualitative approach, grounded in an extensive interview study with representatives of libraries, publishers and policy actors in three Scandinavian countries. To provide in-depth insight into e-lending setups, the scope of empirical material is then limited to accounts the central library and policy actors involved in establishing e-lending.FindingsThe analysis shows that the e-lending setups are both similar (especially when it comes to financing), and different across Scandinavia, especially when it comes to centralisation and involvement of librarians in this task. The differences are attributed to the influence of different governance logics (question of administrative autonomy, collaboration in the field and existing legal and political frames), and to what extent the digital and market logics are incorporated or rejected in the field.Originality/valueThe study provides new insights into the question of how Scandinavian public libraries face the consequences of the digitalisation of book distribution and consumption by investigating how they organise their e-lending services. This has not been explored before, notably in a comparative perspective.","PeriodicalId":506264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Documentation","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-12-2023-0265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe article investigates the institutional setup of e-lending in public libraries in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Our point of departure is that e-lending has necessitated new library collaborations between local, regional and national levels, and therefore, institutional e-lending setups have emerged. The study seeks to provide better understanding of how the institutional setups are structured, how governance logics have shaped them and what tensions and dynamics become visible in the key actors’ problematisations of these setups.Design/methodology/approachThe study is situated in the neo-institutional tradition and applies the institutional logics perspective. The research questions are answered by taking a qualitative approach, grounded in an extensive interview study with representatives of libraries, publishers and policy actors in three Scandinavian countries. To provide in-depth insight into e-lending setups, the scope of empirical material is then limited to accounts the central library and policy actors involved in establishing e-lending.FindingsThe analysis shows that the e-lending setups are both similar (especially when it comes to financing), and different across Scandinavia, especially when it comes to centralisation and involvement of librarians in this task. The differences are attributed to the influence of different governance logics (question of administrative autonomy, collaboration in the field and existing legal and political frames), and to what extent the digital and market logics are incorporated or rejected in the field.Originality/valueThe study provides new insights into the question of how Scandinavian public libraries face the consequences of the digitalisation of book distribution and consumption by investigating how they organise their e-lending services. This has not been explored before, notably in a comparative perspective.
斯堪的纳维亚图书馆的电子借阅机构设置:图书馆和政策参与者眼中的运作逻辑
本文调查了丹麦、挪威和瑞典公共图书馆电子借阅的机构设置。我们的出发点是,电子借阅要求图书馆在地方、地区和国家层面开展新的合作,因此出现了电子借阅的机构设置。本研究旨在更好地了解这些机构设置是如何构建的,管理逻辑是如何形成的,以及在主要参与者对这些机构设置的问题解答中可以看到哪些紧张关系和动态。通过对斯堪的纳维亚三个国家的图书馆、出版商和政策参与者的代表进行广泛的访谈研究,以定性方法回答研究问题。分析结果表明,斯堪的纳维亚各国的电子借阅系统既有相似之处(尤其是在融资方面),也有不同之处,尤其是在集中化和图书馆员参与这项工作方面。这些差异归因于不同管理逻辑的影响(行政自治问题、领域内的合作以及现有的法律和政治框架),以及在多大程度上数字和市场逻辑被纳入或拒绝于该领域。原创性/价值该研究通过调查斯堪的纳维亚公共图书馆如何组织其电子借阅服务,对它们如何面对图书发行和消费数字化的后果这一问题提供了新的见解。以前从未有人从比较的角度探讨过这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信