Behandlung der eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis: Ist Benralizumab eine Alternative?

P. Xanthouli
{"title":"Behandlung der eosinophilen Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis: Ist Benralizumab eine Alternative?","authors":"P. Xanthouli","doi":"10.1159/000538827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Benralizumab is effective in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma and is being investigated for the treatment of other eosinophil-associated diseases. Reports on the use of benralizumab for the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are limited to case reports and small case series. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study including EGPA patients treated with off-label benralizumab. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete response defined as no disease activity (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score=0) and a prednisone dose ≤4 mg/day. Partial response was defined as no disease activity and a prednisone dose ≥4 mg/day. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, including 31 (46%) who had previously received mepolizumab. The use of benralizumab was warranted by uncontrolled asthma in 54 (81%), persistent ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations in 27 (40%) and persistent glucocorticoids (GCs) use in 48 (74%) patients. Median (IQR) follow-up after starting benralizumab was 23 (9–34) months. Thirty-three patients (49%) achieved a complete response, 24 (36%) achieved a partial response and 10 (15%) did not respond. Among the 57 patients who initially responded, 10 (18%) eventually required further line treatments. GCs were discontinued in 23 patients (38%). Prior mepolizumab use was associated with a higher rate of primary failure (26.7% vs 5.4%, p=0.034) and less frequent GCs discontinuation (14.8% vs 55.9%, p=0.001). Vasculitis flares occurred in 7 patients (11%) and were associated with histological evidence of vasculitis and/or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies positivity at benralizumab initiation (p=0.004).","PeriodicalId":17887,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Autoimmun","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Autoimmun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benralizumab is effective in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma and is being investigated for the treatment of other eosinophil-associated diseases. Reports on the use of benralizumab for the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are limited to case reports and small case series. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study including EGPA patients treated with off-label benralizumab. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete response defined as no disease activity (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score=0) and a prednisone dose ≤4 mg/day. Partial response was defined as no disease activity and a prednisone dose ≥4 mg/day. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, including 31 (46%) who had previously received mepolizumab. The use of benralizumab was warranted by uncontrolled asthma in 54 (81%), persistent ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations in 27 (40%) and persistent glucocorticoids (GCs) use in 48 (74%) patients. Median (IQR) follow-up after starting benralizumab was 23 (9–34) months. Thirty-three patients (49%) achieved a complete response, 24 (36%) achieved a partial response and 10 (15%) did not respond. Among the 57 patients who initially responded, 10 (18%) eventually required further line treatments. GCs were discontinued in 23 patients (38%). Prior mepolizumab use was associated with a higher rate of primary failure (26.7% vs 5.4%, p=0.034) and less frequent GCs discontinuation (14.8% vs 55.9%, p=0.001). Vasculitis flares occurred in 7 patients (11%) and were associated with histological evidence of vasculitis and/or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies positivity at benralizumab initiation (p=0.004).
嗜酸性粒细胞肉芽肿伴多血管炎的治疗:苯拉珠单抗是一种选择吗?
背景:苯拉利珠单抗对治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘有效,目前正在研究用于治疗其他嗜酸性粒细胞相关疾病。有关苯拉利珠单抗用于治疗嗜酸性粒细胞肉芽肿伴多血管炎(EGPA)的报道仅限于病例报告和小型病例系列。研究方法我们开展了一项多中心回顾性研究,研究对象包括接受标示外苯拉利珠单抗治疗的 EGPA 患者。主要终点是完全应答率,定义为无疾病活动(伯明翰血管炎活动评分=0)且泼尼松剂量≤4 mg/天。部分应答定义为无疾病活动且泼尼松剂量≥4毫克/天。研究结果共纳入68例患者,其中31例(46%)曾接受过美泊利珠单抗治疗。54例(81%)患者的哮喘未得到控制,27例(40%)患者的耳鼻喉(ENT)症状持续存在,48例(74%)患者持续使用糖皮质激素(GCs),因此需要使用苯拉利珠单抗。开始使用苯拉利珠单抗后的中位(IQR)随访时间为 23(9-34)个月。33例患者(49%)获得了完全应答,24例(36%)获得了部分应答,10例(15%)没有应答。在最初有反应的 57 名患者中,有 10 人(18%)最终需要进一步接受治疗。有 23 名患者(38%)停用了 GCs。曾使用过美泊利单抗的患者初治失败率较高(26.7% 对 5.4%,P=0.034),而停用 GCs 的频率较低(14.8% 对 55.9%,P=0.001)。7名患者(11%)出现了血管炎复发,与开始使用苯拉利珠单抗时血管炎和/或抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体阳性的组织学证据有关(p=0.004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信