An inventory of ethnoveterinary knowledge for chicken disease control in Soroti district, Uganda

G. Zirintunda, J. Kateregga, Sarah Nalule, Patrick Vudriko, Savino Biryomumaisho, J. Acai
{"title":"An inventory of ethnoveterinary knowledge for chicken disease control in Soroti district, Uganda","authors":"G. Zirintunda, J. Kateregga, Sarah Nalule, Patrick Vudriko, Savino Biryomumaisho, J. Acai","doi":"10.4102/jomped.v8i1.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Knowledge regarding the use of ethnoveterinary products in the control of chicken diseases in Uganda is hardly documented.Aim: The study documented the ideas of controlling chicken diseases using herbal remedies as shared by chicken owners.Setting: The study was conducted among backyard and free-ranging chicken owners.Methods: Mixed methods of focus group discussions (FGDs) and farmer questionnaires were used.Results: Most respondents, 91% (71/78), were using ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) and 96.2% (75/78) knew others who were also using them. Of the respondents, 82% (64/78) were convinced that EVMs are effective alternative to conventional treatments. Ethnoveterinary medicines are acceptable and promoted during informal and formal training. The sources of EVM were home gardens, wild sources and markets. Most respondents had their planted EVM materials and acquired knowledge from neighbours and friends. About 37.2% (29/78) of the respondents affirmed that they could not freely share their EVM knowledge with others.Conclusion: The participants of the FGDs and the respondents of the questionnaires knew the acceptable opportunities of alternative drugs of unproven efficacy and safety. The practices pose risks to chickens and the possible development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in chickens and humans. The study shows the need for claim validations to guide the safe use of EVM in chicken.Contribution: The study documents plant materials for treating various chicken diseases. The information is essential in the era of AMR and among communities that cannot afford drugs.","PeriodicalId":502726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jomped.v8i1.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knowledge regarding the use of ethnoveterinary products in the control of chicken diseases in Uganda is hardly documented.Aim: The study documented the ideas of controlling chicken diseases using herbal remedies as shared by chicken owners.Setting: The study was conducted among backyard and free-ranging chicken owners.Methods: Mixed methods of focus group discussions (FGDs) and farmer questionnaires were used.Results: Most respondents, 91% (71/78), were using ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) and 96.2% (75/78) knew others who were also using them. Of the respondents, 82% (64/78) were convinced that EVMs are effective alternative to conventional treatments. Ethnoveterinary medicines are acceptable and promoted during informal and formal training. The sources of EVM were home gardens, wild sources and markets. Most respondents had their planted EVM materials and acquired knowledge from neighbours and friends. About 37.2% (29/78) of the respondents affirmed that they could not freely share their EVM knowledge with others.Conclusion: The participants of the FGDs and the respondents of the questionnaires knew the acceptable opportunities of alternative drugs of unproven efficacy and safety. The practices pose risks to chickens and the possible development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in chickens and humans. The study shows the need for claim validations to guide the safe use of EVM in chicken.Contribution: The study documents plant materials for treating various chicken diseases. The information is essential in the era of AMR and among communities that cannot afford drugs.
乌干达索罗提地区鸡疾病防治民族兽医知识清单
背景:目的:本研究记录了养鸡者分享的使用草药控制鸡病的想法:研究对象为散养和放养鸡的主人:方法:采用焦点小组讨论(FGDs)和农民问卷调查的混合方法:大多数受访者(91%,71/78)都在使用民族兽药(EVM),96.2%(75/78)的受访者知道其他人也在使用民族兽药。在受访者中,82%(64/78)的人认为兽药是传统疗法的有效替代品。在非正式和正式培训中,人们接受并推广民族兽药。EVM 的来源包括家庭菜园、野生来源和市场。大多数受访者都有自己种植的 EVM 材料,并从邻居和朋友那里获得相关知识。约 37.2%(29/78)的受访者表示,他们无法与他人自由分享其 EVM 知识:参与论坛讨论的人和调查问卷的受访者都知道可以接受使用疗效和安全性未经证实的替代药物的机会。这些做法给鸡带来了风险,并可能在鸡和人体内产生抗菌素抗药性(AMR)。该研究表明,有必要进行索赔验证,以指导在鸡中安全使用 EVM:本研究记录了用于治疗各种鸡病的植物材料。贡献:该研究记录了用于治疗各种鸡病的植物材料,这些信息在 AMR 时代和买不起药物的社区中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信