Modified Maximum Dose Bioassay for Assessing Insecticide Response in Field Populations of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY
Jermaine D. Perier, P. S. Cremonez, Albertha J Parkins, Arash Kheirodin, Alvin M. Simmons, David G. Riley
{"title":"Modified Maximum Dose Bioassay for Assessing Insecticide Response in Field Populations of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1","authors":"Jermaine D. Perier, P. S. Cremonez, Albertha J Parkins, Arash Kheirodin, Alvin M. Simmons, David G. Riley","doi":"10.18474/jes23-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), continues to be a major pest of vegetable cultivation in Georgia, USA. Field-by-field surveying is an effective approach to determining the susceptibility status of a B. tabaci population to an insecticide. During 2020–2022, a modified maximum dose bioassay method was tested to characterize the insecticide response of B. tabaci field populations to several commonly used insecticides for whitefly management in Tift Co., GA, and the surrounding areas. A rapid bioassay was used for these evaluations that allowed for field assessments before spray applications to reduce the adult life stage of this species. The results of the evaluations were produced within 24-h following a 24-h root drench period. Our survey suggests that the neonicotinoids dinotefuran and flupyradifurone were the most effective insecticides from the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) group 4A. Cyantraniliprole was also effective, with 88 and 86% adult mortality following exposure to the high (maximum) and low doses, respectively. Conversely, the levels of control using another diamide, cyclaniliprole, were notably lower. Adding a low dose to the high dose provided an early indication of inefficient control with a product potentially indicating an increase in resistance. Specifically, a significant difference between the high and low doses suggests that the dose–response curve had shifted toward resistance development in each B. tabaci field population. The proposed bioassay method is meant for systemic insecticides that offer quick responses on adults. The use of this efficient method will improve evaluations prioritizing insecticides for use or rotation in an insecticide resistance management program.","PeriodicalId":15765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entomological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entomological Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18474/jes23-88","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), continues to be a major pest of vegetable cultivation in Georgia, USA. Field-by-field surveying is an effective approach to determining the susceptibility status of a B. tabaci population to an insecticide. During 2020–2022, a modified maximum dose bioassay method was tested to characterize the insecticide response of B. tabaci field populations to several commonly used insecticides for whitefly management in Tift Co., GA, and the surrounding areas. A rapid bioassay was used for these evaluations that allowed for field assessments before spray applications to reduce the adult life stage of this species. The results of the evaluations were produced within 24-h following a 24-h root drench period. Our survey suggests that the neonicotinoids dinotefuran and flupyradifurone were the most effective insecticides from the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) group 4A. Cyantraniliprole was also effective, with 88 and 86% adult mortality following exposure to the high (maximum) and low doses, respectively. Conversely, the levels of control using another diamide, cyclaniliprole, were notably lower. Adding a low dose to the high dose provided an early indication of inefficient control with a product potentially indicating an increase in resistance. Specifically, a significant difference between the high and low doses suggests that the dose–response curve had shifted toward resistance development in each B. tabaci field population. The proposed bioassay method is meant for systemic insecticides that offer quick responses on adults. The use of this efficient method will improve evaluations prioritizing insecticides for use or rotation in an insecticide resistance management program.
用于评估田间烟粉虱(半翅目:蝼蛄科)对杀虫剂反应的修正最大剂量生物测定法1
甘薯粉虱 Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) MEAM1(半翅目:粉虱科)仍然是美国佐治亚州蔬菜种植的主要害虫。逐田调查是确定烟粉虱种群对杀虫剂敏感性的有效方法。2020-2022 年期间,在佐治亚州 Tift Co. 及其周边地区测试了修改后的最大剂量生物测定方法,以确定田间烟粉虱种群对几种常用杀虫剂的杀虫反应。这些评估采用了快速生物测定法,可在喷洒杀虫剂之前进行实地评估,以减少该物种的成虫生命阶段。评估结果是在 24 小时的根部淋洗后 24 小时内得出的。我们的调查表明,在杀虫剂抗性行动委员会(IRAC)的 4A 组中,新烟碱类杀虫剂中的敌敌畏和氟虫腈是最有效的杀虫剂。氰虫酰胺也很有效,暴露于高剂量(最大剂量)和低剂量后,成虫死亡率分别为 88% 和 86%。相反,使用另一种二酰胺类药物环酰草胺的控制水平则明显较低。在高剂量的基础上增加低剂量,可及早发现控制效率低下的迹象,其产物可能表明抗药性增强。具体来说,高剂量和低剂量之间的显著差异表明,剂量-反应曲线已转向每个田间 B. tabaci 种群的抗性发展。拟议的生物测定方法适用于对成虫反应迅速的系统性杀虫剂。在杀虫剂抗性管理计划中,使用这种高效方法将改进对杀虫剂使用或轮换优先顺序的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Entomological Science (ISSN 0749-8004) is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal that is published quarterly (January, April, July, and October) under the auspices of the Georgia Entomological Society in concert with Allen Press (Lawrence, Kansas). Manuscripts deemed acceptable for publication in the Journal report original research with insects and related arthropods or literature reviews offering foundations to innovative directions in entomological research
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信