Pudendal Block at the Time of Transvaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Michele Torosis, Morgan Fullerton, Daniela Kaefer, Victor Nitti, A. L. Ackerman, T. Grisales
{"title":"Pudendal Block at the Time of Transvaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Michele Torosis, Morgan Fullerton, Daniela Kaefer, Victor Nitti, A. L. Ackerman, T. Grisales","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nThe utility of pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) at the time of transvaginal surgery is mixed in the literature. No published study has evaluated the efficacy of PNB since the widespread adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThis study aimed to determine if PNB, in addition to ERAS measures, at the time of vaginal reconstructive surgery reduces opioid use in the immediate postoperative period.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nIn this randomized, blinded, controlled trial, women scheduled for transvaginal multicompartment prolapse repair were randomized to bilateral PNB before incision with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine versus usual care. Primary outcome was opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the first 24 hours. The study was powered to detect a 5.57-MME difference in opioid use in the first 24 hours between groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty-four patients were randomized from January 2020 to April 2022. The PNB and control groups were well matched in demographic and surgical data. There was no difference in opioid use in first 24 hours between the control and PNB groups (8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8). Median pain scores at 24 and 48 hours did not differ between groups (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3; P = 0.44) and 90% of participants were satisfied with pain control across both groups. Time to return to normal activities (median, 10 days) was also not different between the groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBecause pain satisfaction after transvaginal surgery in the era of ERAS is high, with overall low opioid requirements, PNB provides no additional benefit.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":" 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The utility of pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) at the time of transvaginal surgery is mixed in the literature. No published study has evaluated the efficacy of PNB since the widespread adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if PNB, in addition to ERAS measures, at the time of vaginal reconstructive surgery reduces opioid use in the immediate postoperative period. STUDY DESIGN In this randomized, blinded, controlled trial, women scheduled for transvaginal multicompartment prolapse repair were randomized to bilateral PNB before incision with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine versus usual care. Primary outcome was opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the first 24 hours. The study was powered to detect a 5.57-MME difference in opioid use in the first 24 hours between groups. RESULTS Forty-four patients were randomized from January 2020 to April 2022. The PNB and control groups were well matched in demographic and surgical data. There was no difference in opioid use in first 24 hours between the control and PNB groups (8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8). Median pain scores at 24 and 48 hours did not differ between groups (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3; P = 0.44) and 90% of participants were satisfied with pain control across both groups. Time to return to normal activities (median, 10 days) was also not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Because pain satisfaction after transvaginal surgery in the era of ERAS is high, with overall low opioid requirements, PNB provides no additional benefit.
经阴道脱垂修复术时的阴道阻滞:随机对照试验。
重要性经阴道手术时进行阴部神经阻滞 (PNB) 的效用在文献中说法不一。本研究旨在确定在阴道重建手术时,除了采用 ERAS 措施外,PNB 是否还能减少术后初期阿片类药物的使用。研究设计在这项随机、盲法对照试验中,计划接受经阴道多室脱垂修复术的女性被随机分为在切口前使用 20 mL 0.5% 布比卡因进行双侧 PNB 与常规护理两种。主要结果是头 24 小时的阿片类药物使用量(吗啡毫克当量)。结果从 2020 年 1 月到 2022 年 4 月,44 名患者接受了随机分组。PNB 组和对照组在人口统计学和手术数据方面完全匹配。对照组和 PNB 组在最初 24 小时的阿片类药物使用量没有差异(8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8)。两组患者在 24 小时和 48 小时内的疼痛评分中位数没有差异(4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3;P = 0.44),两组均有 90% 的患者对疼痛控制感到满意。结论由于ERAS时代经阴道手术后的疼痛满意度很高,对阿片类药物的总体需求很低,因此PNB不会带来额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信