THE REFERENCE GAREVKA GRANITE (YENISEI RIDGE, WESTERN MARGIN OF THE SIBERIAN CRATON): THE FINAL ATTEMPT TO VERIFY PALEOPROTEROZOIC Pb/U ISOTOPIC AGE BY M.I. VOLOBUEV

A. Kuzmichev, M. K. Danukalova
{"title":"THE REFERENCE GAREVKA GRANITE (YENISEI RIDGE, WESTERN MARGIN OF THE SIBERIAN CRATON): THE FINAL ATTEMPT TO VERIFY PALEOPROTEROZOIC Pb/U ISOTOPIC AGE BY M.I. VOLOBUEV","authors":"A. Kuzmichev, M. K. Danukalova","doi":"10.5800/gt-2024-15-2-0746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article unravels a confusing history of ideas about the age of the Garevka granite pluton, which is considered as a reference object for the Precambrian of the Yenisei ridge. Initially, the Paleoproterozoic (1750 Ma) age of granite was determined by M.I. Volobuev and co-authors half a century ago using Pb/U isotope analyses of zircons and orthites. This dating is widely used up to recent to substantiate the Early Precambrian age of the metamorphic rocks of the Trans-Angara region. In 2003, V.A. Vernikovsky and his colleagues published data on the Neoproterozoic (752±3 Ma) age of the massif, obtained with modern technique of isotopic analysis. However, some of experts on the geology of the Yenisei ridge considered both isotopic ages correct, believing that the eastern part of the massif comprises Paleoproterozoic gneissic granite. Our investigation revealed the following: V.A. Vernikovsky and M.I. Volobuev indeed have collected their granite samples at the western and at the eastern parts of the pluton correspondingly. Krasnoyarsk geologists map the Garevka pluton as part of the Neoproterozoic Glushikha granite suite, but use to apply its Paleoproterozoic dating to substantiate the early Precambrian age of the host rocks. M.I. Volobuev obtained ten mainly discordant Pb/U analyses of the Garevka granites, and six of them form an explicable combination consistent with the age of 1750 Ma. The only concordant analysis with a known sampling point is decisive for the entire system. Thus, to fix the problem, it was necessary to reproduce this analysis using modern isotope techniques. We have dated (SHRIMP) a granite sample collected at the same point. In addition, three more samples from different parts of the massif were analysed to exclude the possible presence of ancient domains in it. The isotope ratios of all analysed zircons form a concordant cluster with an age of 762±7 Ma. The Garevka pluton comprises a separate mappable body composed of biotite leucogranites with fluorite. Granites do not replace some older rocks, but crystallized from the melt, ascended from deep crust. The question about possible Paleoproterozoic age of the Garevka granite pluton or any part of it is closed. Ideas about the wide distribution of Archean and Paleoproterozoic gneisses in the Trans-Angara region require additional geochronological verification. To date, the presence of such rocks has been reliably established here only at two local points.","PeriodicalId":505746,"journal":{"name":"Geodynamics & Tectonophysics","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodynamics & Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2024-15-2-0746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article unravels a confusing history of ideas about the age of the Garevka granite pluton, which is considered as a reference object for the Precambrian of the Yenisei ridge. Initially, the Paleoproterozoic (1750 Ma) age of granite was determined by M.I. Volobuev and co-authors half a century ago using Pb/U isotope analyses of zircons and orthites. This dating is widely used up to recent to substantiate the Early Precambrian age of the metamorphic rocks of the Trans-Angara region. In 2003, V.A. Vernikovsky and his colleagues published data on the Neoproterozoic (752±3 Ma) age of the massif, obtained with modern technique of isotopic analysis. However, some of experts on the geology of the Yenisei ridge considered both isotopic ages correct, believing that the eastern part of the massif comprises Paleoproterozoic gneissic granite. Our investigation revealed the following: V.A. Vernikovsky and M.I. Volobuev indeed have collected their granite samples at the western and at the eastern parts of the pluton correspondingly. Krasnoyarsk geologists map the Garevka pluton as part of the Neoproterozoic Glushikha granite suite, but use to apply its Paleoproterozoic dating to substantiate the early Precambrian age of the host rocks. M.I. Volobuev obtained ten mainly discordant Pb/U analyses of the Garevka granites, and six of them form an explicable combination consistent with the age of 1750 Ma. The only concordant analysis with a known sampling point is decisive for the entire system. Thus, to fix the problem, it was necessary to reproduce this analysis using modern isotope techniques. We have dated (SHRIMP) a granite sample collected at the same point. In addition, three more samples from different parts of the massif were analysed to exclude the possible presence of ancient domains in it. The isotope ratios of all analysed zircons form a concordant cluster with an age of 762±7 Ma. The Garevka pluton comprises a separate mappable body composed of biotite leucogranites with fluorite. Granites do not replace some older rocks, but crystallized from the melt, ascended from deep crust. The question about possible Paleoproterozoic age of the Garevka granite pluton or any part of it is closed. Ideas about the wide distribution of Archean and Paleoproterozoic gneisses in the Trans-Angara region require additional geochronological verification. To date, the presence of such rocks has been reliably established here only at two local points.
参考加列夫卡花岗岩(叶尼塞山脊,西伯利亚克拉通西缘):М.И. 沃洛布耶夫验证白垩纪铅/铀等时年龄的最后尝试
这篇文章揭开了有关加列夫卡(Garevka)花岗岩岩体年龄的混乱历史,该岩体被认为是叶尼塞山脊前寒武纪的参考对象。最初,半个世纪前,M.I. Volobuev 和合著者利用锆石和正长岩的 Pb/U 同位素分析确定了花岗岩的古近纪年(1750Ma)。这种年代测定方法直到最近仍被广泛用于证实外安加拉地区变质岩的早前寒武纪年龄。2003 年,V.A. Vernikovsky 和他的同事发表了利用现代同位素分析技术获得的该地块的新近纪(752±3Ma)年龄数据。然而,一些研究叶尼塞山脊地质学的专家认为这两个同位素年龄都是正确的,认为山丘的东部是古新生代片麻岩。我们的调查发现了以下情况:V.A. Vernikovsky 和 M.I. Volobuev 的确分别在岩体的西部和东部采集了花岗岩样本。克拉斯诺亚尔斯克地质学家将加列夫卡岩体绘制成新新生代格卢希卡花岗岩岩套的一部分,但利用其古生代年代来证实母岩的早前寒武纪年龄。M.I. Volobuev 对加列夫卡花岗岩进行了十次主要是不一致的 Pb/U 分析,其中六次形成了与 1750 Ma 年龄一致的可解释的组合。唯一与已知取样点一致的分析结果对整个系统具有决定性意义。因此,为了解决这个问题,有必要利用现代同位素技术重新进行分析。我们对在同一地点采集的花岗岩样本进行了年代测定(SHRIMP)。此外,我们还分析了来自山丘不同地区的另外三个样本,以排除其中可能存在的古域。所有分析的锆石的同位素比率形成了一个年龄为 762±7 Ma 的一致群。加列夫卡岩体是由含萤石的黑云母白花岗岩组成的独立岩体。花岗岩并没有取代一些较古老的岩石,而是从地壳深处上升的熔体中结晶出来的。关于加列夫卡花岗岩岩体或其任何部分可能的古新生代年龄的问题已经结束。关于外安加拉地区广泛分布阿新世和古新生代片麻岩的想法需要更多的地质年代验证。迄今为止,仅在两个地方可靠地确定了此类岩石的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信