Comparative Analysis of AES and RSA with Other Encryption Techniques for Secure Communication

Prashant, MD Sohail Haque, Amrinder Kaur, Pankaj Yadav
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of AES and RSA with Other Encryption Techniques for Secure Communication","authors":"Prashant, MD Sohail Haque, Amrinder Kaur, Pankaj Yadav","doi":"10.32628/cseit2410263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s digitized era, where the whole world is interconnected and every information about individuals are collected, it is important to process and store the data such that it is safe from unauthorized access. Encryption is used to turn the plain text into cipher text which makes the data unreadable, thus maintaining its confidentiality and integrity. Among the several encryption methods available, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) are popularly used due to their effectiveness and efficiency. However, alternative encryption techniques exist, each offers different level of security and performance. This study presents a thorough comparative analysis of AES and RSA alongside other encryption methods to assess their suitability for secure communication. Factors such as encryption strength, computational complexity, key management, scalability, and versatility are examined to provide a comprehensive understanding of each technique's strengths and weaknesses. By scrutinizing these aspects, this research aims to offer insights for decision-makers in selecting the most suitable encryption method tailored to specific requirements and constraints.","PeriodicalId":313456,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit2410263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s digitized era, where the whole world is interconnected and every information about individuals are collected, it is important to process and store the data such that it is safe from unauthorized access. Encryption is used to turn the plain text into cipher text which makes the data unreadable, thus maintaining its confidentiality and integrity. Among the several encryption methods available, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) are popularly used due to their effectiveness and efficiency. However, alternative encryption techniques exist, each offers different level of security and performance. This study presents a thorough comparative analysis of AES and RSA alongside other encryption methods to assess their suitability for secure communication. Factors such as encryption strength, computational complexity, key management, scalability, and versatility are examined to provide a comprehensive understanding of each technique's strengths and weaknesses. By scrutinizing these aspects, this research aims to offer insights for decision-makers in selecting the most suitable encryption method tailored to specific requirements and constraints.
AES 和 RSA 与其他安全通信加密技术的比较分析
在当今的数字化时代,整个世界都是互联的,每个人的信息都会被收集起来,因此处理和存储数据时必须确保其安全,防止未经授权的访问。加密就是将纯文本转化为密码文本,使数据无法读取,从而保持数据的机密性和完整性。在现有的几种加密方法中,高级加密标准(AES)和 Rivest Shamir Adleman(RSA)因其有效性和效率而被广泛使用。然而,还有其他加密技术,每种技术都具有不同的安全性和性能。本研究对 AES 和 RSA 以及其他加密方法进行了全面的比较分析,以评估它们是否适用于安全通信。通过对加密强度、计算复杂性、密钥管理、可扩展性和多功能性等因素的研究,可以全面了解每种技术的优缺点。通过仔细研究这些方面,本研究旨在为决策者提供见解,帮助他们根据具体要求和限制选择最合适的加密方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信