Comparative analysis of the efficacy of seniprutug (BCD-180) and adalimumab in the treatment of active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a systematic review and matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Abstract

Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy of seniprutug (BCD-180) and adalimumab (ADA) in the treatment of adults with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA).Materials and methods. Based on the results of a previously conducted systematic review, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed, adjusting for confounding factors. The analysis was based on the results of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of seniprutug (BCD-180-2/ELEFTA, NCT05445076) and ADA (ATLAS, NCT00085644) that met the selection criteria. We chose ASAS40 and ASAS20 measurements at week 24 as efficacy outcomes. Initial BASDAI and BASFI indices, proportion of women in the study population, time from disease onset, and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were considered as confounders.Results and discussion. The MAIC showed a statistically significant advantage in the clinical efficacy of seniprutug (BCD-180) over ADA. When adjusted, the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for seniprutug (BCD-180)/ADA were 1.86 (1.15; 3.02) and 2.21 (1.34; 3.72) for ASAS40 and ASAS20, respectively, at week 24.Conclusion. The MAIC demonstrated statistically significant superiority of seniprutug (BCD-180) over ADA on the key efficacy endpoints ASAS40 and ASAS20 at week 24 in adults with active r-axSpA. The inclusion of the innovative domestic drug seniprutug into treatment paradigm of active r-axSpA will potentially reduce the socio-economic burden of this disease by providing an affordable, effective and safe therapy while optimizing healthcare costs