Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Vishnuraj K R, Kunal Singh, N. Sahay, C. Sinha, Amarjeet Kumar, Neeraj Kumar
{"title":"Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Vishnuraj K R, Kunal Singh, N. Sahay, C. Sinha, Amarjeet Kumar, Neeraj Kumar","doi":"10.17085/apm.23097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opioids administered as bolus doses or continuous infusions are widely used by anesthesiologists worldwide for major and day care surgeries. Opioid-free anesthesia is a multimodal anesthesia and analgesia technique that does not use opioid drugs, thereby benefitting patients from opioid-related adverse effects. In this study, we compared the postoperative analgesic requirements of patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under opioid-free and opioid-based anesthesia.Methods: This study included 88 patients aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Participants were randomly divided into two groups with forty-four participants in each group. The opioid-free anesthesia group was administered an intravenous bolus of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, whereas the opioid-based group was administered fentanyl with conventional general anesthesia. The primary outcome was to compare the total amount of fentanyl consumed by both groups during the 6 h postoperative period following extubation. Episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and vital signs were noted throughout the postoperative period to analyze the secondary outcomes.Results: Both the groups had similar demographic characteristics. The opioid-free group required less postoperative analgesia within the first 2 h (61.4 ± 17.4 vs. 79.0 ± 19.4 of fentanyl, P < 0.001), which was statistically significant. However, fentanyl consumption was comparable between the groups at the sixth postoperative hour (opioid-free group 152 ± 28.2 vs. opioid group 164 ± 33.4, P = 0.061). Compared with 4.5% of the participants in the opioid-free group, 34% of those in the opioid-based group developed moderate PONV.Conclusions: The opioid-free anesthesia technique in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced the requirement of analgesia in the first two hours of the postoperative period and was associated with decreased PONV.","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" 58","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioids administered as bolus doses or continuous infusions are widely used by anesthesiologists worldwide for major and day care surgeries. Opioid-free anesthesia is a multimodal anesthesia and analgesia technique that does not use opioid drugs, thereby benefitting patients from opioid-related adverse effects. In this study, we compared the postoperative analgesic requirements of patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under opioid-free and opioid-based anesthesia.Methods: This study included 88 patients aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Participants were randomly divided into two groups with forty-four participants in each group. The opioid-free anesthesia group was administered an intravenous bolus of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, whereas the opioid-based group was administered fentanyl with conventional general anesthesia. The primary outcome was to compare the total amount of fentanyl consumed by both groups during the 6 h postoperative period following extubation. Episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and vital signs were noted throughout the postoperative period to analyze the secondary outcomes.Results: Both the groups had similar demographic characteristics. The opioid-free group required less postoperative analgesia within the first 2 h (61.4 ± 17.4 vs. 79.0 ± 19.4 of fentanyl, P < 0.001), which was statistically significant. However, fentanyl consumption was comparable between the groups at the sixth postoperative hour (opioid-free group 152 ± 28.2 vs. opioid group 164 ± 33.4, P = 0.061). Compared with 4.5% of the participants in the opioid-free group, 34% of those in the opioid-based group developed moderate PONV.Conclusions: The opioid-free anesthesia technique in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced the requirement of analgesia in the first two hours of the postoperative period and was associated with decreased PONV.
在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中联合使用氯胺酮和右美托咪定进行无阿片麻醉:随机对照试验
背景:阿片类药物以栓剂或持续输注的方式被世界各地的麻醉医生广泛用于大型手术和日间护理手术。无阿片麻醉是一种不使用阿片类药物的多模式麻醉和镇痛技术,从而使患者免受阿片类药物相关不良反应的影响。在这项研究中,我们比较了计划在无阿片麻醉和阿片麻醉下进行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的术后镇痛需求:本研究纳入了88名年龄在18-60岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为1级和2级、接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。参与者被随机分为两组,每组 44 人。无阿片类药物麻醉组采用氯胺酮和右美托咪定静脉注射,而阿片类药物麻醉组采用芬太尼和常规全身麻醉。主要结果是比较两组在术后拔管后 6 小时内的芬太尼总用量。术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)发作情况和生命体征在整个术后期间均有记录,以分析次要结果:结果:两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。无阿片类药物组在术后 2 小时内所需的镇痛剂量较少(61.4 ± 17.4 对 79.0 ± 19.4,P < 0.001),这在统计学上有显著意义。不过,术后第六小时两组的芬太尼用量相当(无阿片组 152 ± 28.2 vs. 阿片组 164 ± 33.4,P = 0.061)。与无阿片组4.5%的参与者相比,阿片组34%的参与者出现了中度PONV:结论:在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,无阿片类药物麻醉技术减少了术后头两小时的镇痛需求,并降低了PONV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信