Cross-cultural validation: Sinhala versions of pediatric symptom checklists for screening adolescent psychosocial problems

D. Wijekoon, Y. Rohanachandra, S. Semage, T. Fauz, S. Prathapan, Wmdvs Wijekoon
{"title":"Cross-cultural validation: Sinhala versions of pediatric symptom checklists for screening adolescent psychosocial problems","authors":"D. Wijekoon, Y. Rohanachandra, S. Semage, T. Fauz, S. Prathapan, Wmdvs Wijekoon","doi":"10.4038/sljpsyc.v14i2.8494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychosocial problems can significantly impact adolescents' personal and social functioning. Early identification of these problems through a brief checklist can alter the life trajectory of an individual. The Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) and the Youth Self-reported Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-Y) are screening tools commonly used to assess psychosocial problems among children and adolescents.Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Sinhala versions of these tools; S-PSC and S/PSC-Y, in identifying psychosocial problems among adolescents of army war widows.Methods: The PSC and the PSC-Y, 35-item screening tools originally developed and validated in the United States were initially translated, culturally adapted using modified Delphi process and tested for judgmental validity. The PSC and PSC-Y criterion validity was appraised against clinical diagnoses by a consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist, with 156 purposively selected adolescents aged 10-19 years from the Western Province of Sri Lanka. The study used the test-retest method and internal consistency analysis to assess reliability.Results: The judgmental validity testing of both tools revealed good psychometric properties across all items. The overall Sinhala version of the PSC demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI=71.0-96.5) and a specificity of 91.9% (95% CI=85.7-96.1). The overall Sinhala version of the PSC-Y demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.4% (95% CI=67.2-94.7) and a specificity of 70.2% (95% CI=61.3-78.0). Both tools showed satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.88. Correlation coefficients for the Sinhala version of PSC ranged from 0.75 to 0.90, and for the Sinhala version of PSC-Y, from 0.71 to 0.79.Conclusions: The Sinhala versions of the PSC (S-PSC) and PSC-Y (S/PSC-Y) are valid and reliable tools for screening psychosocial problems among 10-19-year-olds in Sri Lanka.","PeriodicalId":53403,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljpsyc.v14i2.8494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial problems can significantly impact adolescents' personal and social functioning. Early identification of these problems through a brief checklist can alter the life trajectory of an individual. The Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) and the Youth Self-reported Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-Y) are screening tools commonly used to assess psychosocial problems among children and adolescents.Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Sinhala versions of these tools; S-PSC and S/PSC-Y, in identifying psychosocial problems among adolescents of army war widows.Methods: The PSC and the PSC-Y, 35-item screening tools originally developed and validated in the United States were initially translated, culturally adapted using modified Delphi process and tested for judgmental validity. The PSC and PSC-Y criterion validity was appraised against clinical diagnoses by a consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist, with 156 purposively selected adolescents aged 10-19 years from the Western Province of Sri Lanka. The study used the test-retest method and internal consistency analysis to assess reliability.Results: The judgmental validity testing of both tools revealed good psychometric properties across all items. The overall Sinhala version of the PSC demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI=71.0-96.5) and a specificity of 91.9% (95% CI=85.7-96.1). The overall Sinhala version of the PSC-Y demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.4% (95% CI=67.2-94.7) and a specificity of 70.2% (95% CI=61.3-78.0). Both tools showed satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.88. Correlation coefficients for the Sinhala version of PSC ranged from 0.75 to 0.90, and for the Sinhala version of PSC-Y, from 0.71 to 0.79.Conclusions: The Sinhala versions of the PSC (S-PSC) and PSC-Y (S/PSC-Y) are valid and reliable tools for screening psychosocial problems among 10-19-year-olds in Sri Lanka.
跨文化验证:用于筛查青少年社会心理问题的僧伽罗语版儿科症状检查表
背景:社会心理问题会严重影响青少年的个人和社会功能。通过简短的核对表及早发现这些问题可以改变一个人的生活轨迹。儿童症状核对表(PSC)和青少年自我报告儿童症状核对表(PSC-Y)是常用于评估儿童和青少年社会心理问题的筛查工具。目的:本研究旨在评估这些工具的僧伽罗语版本(S-PSC 和 S/PSC-Y)在识别军队战争遗孀青少年社会心理问题方面的有效性和可靠性:PSC和PSC-Y是最初在美国开发和验证的35项筛查工具,我们对其进行了初步翻译,并通过修改后的德尔菲程序对其进行了文化调整,并对其判断有效性进行了测试。儿童和青少年精神病学顾问根据临床诊断对 PSC 和 PSC-Y 的标准有效性进行了评估,并有针对性地从斯里兰卡西部省挑选了 156 名 10-19 岁的青少年。研究采用重复测试法和内部一致性分析来评估可靠性:结果:两种工具的判断有效性测试表明,所有项目均具有良好的心理测量特性。僧伽罗语版 PSC 的灵敏度为 87.5%(95% CI=71.0-96.5),特异度为 91.9%(95% CI=85.7-96.1)。僧伽罗语版 PSC-Y 的总体灵敏度为 84.4%(95% CI=67.2-94.7),特异度为 70.2%(95% CI=61.3-78.0)。两种工具的内部一致性均令人满意,Cronbach's alpha 值均为 0.88。僧伽罗语版 PSC 的相关系数在 0.75 至 0.90 之间,僧伽罗语版 PSC-Y 的相关系数在 0.71 至 0.79 之间:僧伽罗语版 PSC(S-PSC)和 PSC-Y(S/PSC-Y)是筛查斯里兰卡 10-19 岁儿童心理问题的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信