Challenges With Robot-Assisted Surgery Setup for Complex Minimally Invasive Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Falisha F. Kanji, Aleeque Marselian, Miguel Burch, Monica Jain, Tara N Cohen
{"title":"Challenges With Robot-Assisted Surgery Setup for Complex Minimally Invasive Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.","authors":"Falisha F. Kanji, Aleeque Marselian, Miguel Burch, Monica Jain, Tara N Cohen","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe utilization of robot-assisted approaches to surgery has increased significantly over the last two decades. This has introduced novel complexities into the operating room environment, requiring management of new challenges and workflow adaptation. This study aimed to analyze challenges in the surgical setup for complex upper gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery (UGI-RAS) and identify opportunities for solutions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nDirect observations of surgical setup processes for UGI-RAS were performed by a trained Human Factors researcher at a non-profit academic medical center in Southern California. Setup tasks were subdivided into five phases: (1) before wheels-in; (2) patient transfer and anesthesia induction; (3) patient preparation; (4) surgery preparation; and (5) robot docking. Start/end times for each phase/task were documented along with workflow disruption (FD) narratives and timestamps. Setup tasks and FDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty UGI-RAS setup procedures were observed between May-November 2023: sleeve gastrectomy +/- hiatal hernia repair (n = 9, 45.00%); para-esophageal hernia repair +/- fundoplication (n = 8, 40.00%); revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2, 10.00%); and gastric band removal (n = 1, 5.00%). Frequent FDs included planning breakdowns (n = 20, 29.85%), equipment/supply management (n = 17, 25.37%), patient care coordination (n = 8, 11.94%), and equipment challenges (n = 8, 11.94%). Eleven of 20 observations were first-start cases, of which 10 experienced delayed starts.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nInterventions aimed at improving workflows during UGI-RAS setup include performing pre-operative team huddles and conducting trainings aimed at team coordination and equipment challenges. These solutions could result in improved teamwork, efficiency, and communication while reducing case start delays and turnover time.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 8","pages":"31348241248696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The utilization of robot-assisted approaches to surgery has increased significantly over the last two decades. This has introduced novel complexities into the operating room environment, requiring management of new challenges and workflow adaptation. This study aimed to analyze challenges in the surgical setup for complex upper gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery (UGI-RAS) and identify opportunities for solutions. METHODS Direct observations of surgical setup processes for UGI-RAS were performed by a trained Human Factors researcher at a non-profit academic medical center in Southern California. Setup tasks were subdivided into five phases: (1) before wheels-in; (2) patient transfer and anesthesia induction; (3) patient preparation; (4) surgery preparation; and (5) robot docking. Start/end times for each phase/task were documented along with workflow disruption (FD) narratives and timestamps. Setup tasks and FDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Twenty UGI-RAS setup procedures were observed between May-November 2023: sleeve gastrectomy +/- hiatal hernia repair (n = 9, 45.00%); para-esophageal hernia repair +/- fundoplication (n = 8, 40.00%); revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2, 10.00%); and gastric band removal (n = 1, 5.00%). Frequent FDs included planning breakdowns (n = 20, 29.85%), equipment/supply management (n = 17, 25.37%), patient care coordination (n = 8, 11.94%), and equipment challenges (n = 8, 11.94%). Eleven of 20 observations were first-start cases, of which 10 experienced delayed starts. DISCUSSION Interventions aimed at improving workflows during UGI-RAS setup include performing pre-operative team huddles and conducting trainings aimed at team coordination and equipment challenges. These solutions could result in improved teamwork, efficiency, and communication while reducing case start delays and turnover time.
复杂微创上消化道手术的机器人辅助手术设置挑战。
背景在过去二十年里,机器人辅助手术的使用率大幅提高。这给手术室环境带来了新的复杂性,需要应对新的挑战和适应工作流程。本研究旨在分析复杂的上消化道机器人辅助手术(UGI-RAS)在手术准备过程中遇到的挑战,并找出解决问题的机会。方法由南加州一家非营利性学术医疗中心受过训练的人为因素研究员对 UGI-RAS 的手术准备过程进行直接观察。设置任务被细分为五个阶段:(1) 入轮前;(2) 患者转移和麻醉诱导;(3) 患者准备;(4) 手术准备;(5) 机器人对接。每个阶段/任务的开始/结束时间以及工作流程中断(FD)说明和时间戳都记录在案。结果在 2023 年 5 月至 11 月期间,观察到 20 个 UGI-RAS 设置程序:袖状胃切除术 +/- 裂孔疝修补术(n = 9,45.00%);食道旁疝修补术 +/- 胃底折叠术(n = 8,40.00%);Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术翻修(n = 2,10.00%);胃束带切除术(n = 1,5.00%)。经常出现的故障包括计划中断(20 例,占 29.85%)、设备/供应管理(17 例,占 25.37%)、患者护理协调(8 例,占 11.94%)和设备难题(8 例,占 11.94%)。讨论旨在改善 UGI-RAS 设置过程中工作流程的干预措施包括开展术前团队会议以及针对团队协调和设备挑战开展培训。这些解决方案可以改善团队合作、效率和沟通,同时减少病例启动延迟和周转时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信