Enhancing pedagogical practices: Insights from novice and experienced English language teachers

Mostafa Morady Moghaddam, Mohammad Hossein Tirnaz
{"title":"Enhancing pedagogical practices: Insights from novice and experienced English language teachers","authors":"Mostafa Morady Moghaddam, Mohammad Hossein Tirnaz","doi":"10.29140/ajal.v7n1.1177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the pedagogical knowledge of novice and experienced English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in Iran by analyzing their verbal reports. This research aims to identify the pedagogical knowledge categories inferred from the teachers’ reports, determine the frequency of occurrence of each category, and compare the differences between novice and experienced teachers. This study employs the Stimulated Recall Technique and combines quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The teaching process (about 90 min) of a total of 40 EFL teachers recorded, and then the teachers were interviewed about their teaching practices. The data were transcribed and analyzed using Gatbonton’s (2008) framework of pedagogical knowledge categories. The dominant pedagogical knowledge categories for novice teachers were Procedure Check, Language Management, Note Behavior, Progress Review, Knowledge of Students, and Affective, accounting for 67.33% of their pedagogical thought units. In contrast, the dominant pedagogical knowledge categories for experienced teachers were Language Management, Procedure Check, Progress Review, Beliefs, Decisions, and Note Behavior, accounting for 66.22% oftheir pedagogical thought units. This study contributes to the understanding of EFL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in the Iranian context and has implications for teacher training and professional development. The findings can inform the design ofeffective training programs that address the specific needs of novice and experienced teachers, thereby enhancing their pedagogical knowledge and instructional practices.","PeriodicalId":220888,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"118 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n1.1177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the pedagogical knowledge of novice and experienced English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in Iran by analyzing their verbal reports. This research aims to identify the pedagogical knowledge categories inferred from the teachers’ reports, determine the frequency of occurrence of each category, and compare the differences between novice and experienced teachers. This study employs the Stimulated Recall Technique and combines quantitative and qualitative data analyses. The teaching process (about 90 min) of a total of 40 EFL teachers recorded, and then the teachers were interviewed about their teaching practices. The data were transcribed and analyzed using Gatbonton’s (2008) framework of pedagogical knowledge categories. The dominant pedagogical knowledge categories for novice teachers were Procedure Check, Language Management, Note Behavior, Progress Review, Knowledge of Students, and Affective, accounting for 67.33% of their pedagogical thought units. In contrast, the dominant pedagogical knowledge categories for experienced teachers were Language Management, Procedure Check, Progress Review, Beliefs, Decisions, and Note Behavior, accounting for 66.22% oftheir pedagogical thought units. This study contributes to the understanding of EFL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in the Iranian context and has implications for teacher training and professional development. The findings can inform the design ofeffective training programs that address the specific needs of novice and experienced teachers, thereby enhancing their pedagogical knowledge and instructional practices.
加强教学实践:新手和经验丰富的英语教师的见解
本研究通过分析伊朗英语作为外语(EFL)教师的口头报告,调查了他们的教学知识。本研究旨在确定从教师报告中推断出的教学知识类别,确定每个类别出现的频率,并比较新手教师和经验丰富教师之间的差异。本研究采用了 "刺激回忆技术",并结合了定量和定性数据分析。共记录了 40 名 EFL 教师的教学过程(约 90 分钟),然后就教师的教学实践进行了访谈。数据经转录后,采用 Gatbonton(2008 年)的教学知识分类框架进行分析。新手教师的主导教学知识类别是程序检查、语言管理、注意行为、进度回顾、学生知识和情感,占其教学思维单元的 67.33%。相比之下,经验型教师的主要教学知识类别为语言管理、程序检查、进度回顾、信念、决策和笔记行为,占其教学思维单元的 66.22%。本研究有助于了解伊朗环境下 EFL 教师的教学知识,并对教师培训和专业发展具有启示意义。研究结果可以为设计有效的培训计划提供信息,从而满足新手教师和有经验教师的特殊需求,提高他们的教学知识和教学实践水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信