Post-Tonsillectomy Pain:Is Cold Steel Dissection Method or Bipolar Diathermy Dissection Method is less Painful?

Muhammad Usman, Naveed Khan, Shafiq Ahmad, Inayat Ullah, Ubaidullah, Ashfaq Hussain
{"title":"Post-Tonsillectomy Pain:Is Cold Steel Dissection Method or Bipolar Diathermy Dissection Method is less Painful?","authors":"Muhammad Usman, Naveed Khan, Shafiq Ahmad, Inayat Ullah, Ubaidullah, Ashfaq Hussain","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Back ground: Pain is one of the sequel of tonsillectomy, as reported in various studies. Tonsillectomy can be done by various methods, so aim of the present study is to evaluate pain of tonsillectomy comparing cold steel dissection method with bipolar diathermy method.Objective: To evaluate post-tonsillectomy pain comparing cold steel dissection method with bipolar diathermy method.Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in ENT Department, from 18th January 2021 to January 30th 2022. Post tonsillectomy pain was measured by using visual analogue scale which consists of a 10 cm line with score of 10 means worse pain and score of zero means no pain. In this study a total sample size was 186 patients (i.e. 93 in each group), who were observed by taking the following parameters. Mean ± SD of group A (bipolar diathermy group) = 2.27 ± 1.25. Mean ± SD of group B (cold steel dissection group) = 1.59 ± 1.59. Confidence interval (2-sided) =95%. Power=90%. More over consecutive (nonprobability) sampling technique was used for sample collection.Results: In bipolar dissection group (38%) patients were male and (62%) patients were female. Where as in cold dissection group (40%) patients were male and (60%) patients were female. The mean pain score at 24 hours, 2ndpost operative day, 7th post operative day among two groups was analyzed. In bipolar dissection group, mean pain score at 24 hours was 3.5 ± 0.66, mean pain score at 2nd post operative day was 2.93 ± 0.73 and mean pain score at 7th post operative was 1.59 ± 1.02. Where as in cold dissection group, mean pain score at 24 hours was 3.33 ± 0.53 with a p value of 0.0543, mean pain score at 2ndpost operative day was 2.34 ± 0.60 with a p value of 0.0001and mean pain score at 7th post operative was 1.46 ± 0.82 with a p value of 0.3394.Conclusion: Our study concludes that mean pain score is less in cold steel dissection tonsillectomy as compared to bipolar diathermy tonsillectomy.Keywords: Analogue pain scale, Surgical Diathermy, Tonsillectomy.","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.2.804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Back ground: Pain is one of the sequel of tonsillectomy, as reported in various studies. Tonsillectomy can be done by various methods, so aim of the present study is to evaluate pain of tonsillectomy comparing cold steel dissection method with bipolar diathermy method.Objective: To evaluate post-tonsillectomy pain comparing cold steel dissection method with bipolar diathermy method.Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in ENT Department, from 18th January 2021 to January 30th 2022. Post tonsillectomy pain was measured by using visual analogue scale which consists of a 10 cm line with score of 10 means worse pain and score of zero means no pain. In this study a total sample size was 186 patients (i.e. 93 in each group), who were observed by taking the following parameters. Mean ± SD of group A (bipolar diathermy group) = 2.27 ± 1.25. Mean ± SD of group B (cold steel dissection group) = 1.59 ± 1.59. Confidence interval (2-sided) =95%. Power=90%. More over consecutive (nonprobability) sampling technique was used for sample collection.Results: In bipolar dissection group (38%) patients were male and (62%) patients were female. Where as in cold dissection group (40%) patients were male and (60%) patients were female. The mean pain score at 24 hours, 2ndpost operative day, 7th post operative day among two groups was analyzed. In bipolar dissection group, mean pain score at 24 hours was 3.5 ± 0.66, mean pain score at 2nd post operative day was 2.93 ± 0.73 and mean pain score at 7th post operative was 1.59 ± 1.02. Where as in cold dissection group, mean pain score at 24 hours was 3.33 ± 0.53 with a p value of 0.0543, mean pain score at 2ndpost operative day was 2.34 ± 0.60 with a p value of 0.0001and mean pain score at 7th post operative was 1.46 ± 0.82 with a p value of 0.3394.Conclusion: Our study concludes that mean pain score is less in cold steel dissection tonsillectomy as compared to bipolar diathermy tonsillectomy.Keywords: Analogue pain scale, Surgical Diathermy, Tonsillectomy.
扁桃体切除术后疼痛:冷钢剥离法和双极透热剥离法疼痛更轻?
背景:疼痛是扁桃体切除术的后遗症之一,这在多项研究中均有报道。扁桃体切除术可采用多种方法,因此本研究的目的是评估扁桃体切除术后的疼痛,并对冷钢剥离法与双极透热法进行比较:比较冷钢剥离法与双极透热法,评估扁桃体切除术后的疼痛:这项前瞻性、随机对照试验于 2021 年 1 月 18 日至 2022 年 1 月 30 日在耳鼻喉科进行。扁桃体切除术后疼痛采用视觉模拟量表进行测量,量表由一条 10 厘米长的线组成,10 分表示疼痛加重,0 分表示无痛。本研究的总样本量为 186 例患者(即每组 93 例),通过以下参数对其进行观察。A 组(双极电疗组)的平均值(± SD)= 2.27 ± 1.25。B组(冷钢剥离组)的平均±标准差 = 1.59 ± 1.59。置信区间(双侧)=95%。功率=90%。样本收集采用连续(非概率)抽样技术:双极剥离组(38%)患者为男性,(62%)患者为女性。而在冷剥离组中,男性患者占 40%,女性患者占 60%。分析了两组患者在术后 24 小时、术后第 2 天和术后第 7 天的平均疼痛评分。在双极剥离组,24 小时的平均疼痛评分为 3.5 ± 0.66,术后第 2 天的平均疼痛评分为 2.93 ± 0.73,术后第 7 天的平均疼痛评分为 1.59 ± 1.02。而在冷剥离组中,24 小时的平均疼痛评分为 3.33 ± 0.53,P 值为 0.0543;术后第 2 天的平均疼痛评分为 2.34 ± 0.60,P 值为 0.0001;术后第 7 天的平均疼痛评分为 1.46 ± 0.82,P 值为 0.3394:我们的研究得出结论,与双极透热扁桃体切除术相比,冷钢剥离扁桃体切除术的平均疼痛评分较低:模拟疼痛量表 外科热疗扁桃体切除术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信