INFLUENCE OF ORIENTATION ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF A MAGNETIC COMPASS ON THE ACCURACY OF DETERMINING THE POSITION OF THE PALEOMAGNETIC POLE AND THE AMPLITUDE OF PALEOSECULAR VARIATIONS

D. A. Ushakov, I. E. Lebedev, V. E. Pavlov
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF ORIENTATION ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF A MAGNETIC COMPASS ON THE ACCURACY OF DETERMINING THE POSITION OF THE PALEOMAGNETIC POLE AND THE AMPLITUDE OF PALEOSECULAR VARIATIONS","authors":"D. A. Ushakov, I. E. Lebedev, V. E. Pavlov","doi":"10.5800/gt-2024-15-2-0752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of a magnetic compass in paleomagnetic studies of highly magnetic rocks (for instance, basalts) can lead to large errors in the orientation of paleomagnetic samples. On the other hand, alternative methods of orientation are relatively time-consuming, and in the case of using a solar compass, they also require sunny weather – a condition that is rarely met, especially when sampling at high and subpolar latitudes. This often leads to the fact that researchers in their work rely on the results of magnetic compass measurements, while assuming that the resulting errors are of a random nature and, with sufficiently good statistics, are averaged. In this study, numerical modeling is performed, which allows us to verify this assumption and assess how much orientation errors associated with the use of a magnetic compass can affect the final results of paleomagnetic studies, such as determining the position of the paleomagnetic pole and the amplitude of ancient geomagnetic variations. As a result of the work performed , it is shown that: 1) the amplitudes of paleosecular variations and the positions of paleomagnetic poles are weakly sensitive to moderate and even relatively large errors in the orientation of paleomagnetic samples associated with the use of a magnetic compass; 2) very large errors in the orientation of samples lead to a significant increase in the within-site scatter of paleomagnetic directions, which makes it possible to detect and exclude the corresponding sites with a large (for instance >15°) value of the α95; 3) the influence of distortions associated with the use of a magnetic compass on the accuracy of determining the position of the paleomagnetic pole and the amplitude of ancient geomagnetic variations depends on latitude. At near-equatorial latitudes, this effect is maximal, at medium latitudes – minimal.","PeriodicalId":505746,"journal":{"name":"Geodynamics & Tectonophysics","volume":"116 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodynamics & Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5800/gt-2024-15-2-0752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of a magnetic compass in paleomagnetic studies of highly magnetic rocks (for instance, basalts) can lead to large errors in the orientation of paleomagnetic samples. On the other hand, alternative methods of orientation are relatively time-consuming, and in the case of using a solar compass, they also require sunny weather – a condition that is rarely met, especially when sampling at high and subpolar latitudes. This often leads to the fact that researchers in their work rely on the results of magnetic compass measurements, while assuming that the resulting errors are of a random nature and, with sufficiently good statistics, are averaged. In this study, numerical modeling is performed, which allows us to verify this assumption and assess how much orientation errors associated with the use of a magnetic compass can affect the final results of paleomagnetic studies, such as determining the position of the paleomagnetic pole and the amplitude of ancient geomagnetic variations. As a result of the work performed , it is shown that: 1) the amplitudes of paleosecular variations and the positions of paleomagnetic poles are weakly sensitive to moderate and even relatively large errors in the orientation of paleomagnetic samples associated with the use of a magnetic compass; 2) very large errors in the orientation of samples lead to a significant increase in the within-site scatter of paleomagnetic directions, which makes it possible to detect and exclude the corresponding sites with a large (for instance >15°) value of the α95; 3) the influence of distortions associated with the use of a magnetic compass on the accuracy of determining the position of the paleomagnetic pole and the amplitude of ancient geomagnetic variations depends on latitude. At near-equatorial latitudes, this effect is maximal, at medium latitudes – minimal.
与使用磁罗盘有关的方位误差对确定古地磁极位置和古地磁变化幅度的准确性的影响
在对高磁性岩石(如玄武岩)进行古地磁研究时,使用磁罗盘会导致古地磁样本的定向出现较大误差。另一方面,其他定向方法相对耗时,而且在使用太阳罗盘的情况下,还需要晴朗的天气--这种条件很少能满足,尤其是在高纬度和亚极地取样时。这往往导致研究人员在工作中依赖于磁罗盘测量的结果,同时假定由此产生的误差是随机性质的,并且在有足够好的统计数据的情况下被平均化。在这项研究中,我们进行了数值建模,从而验证了这一假设,并评估了与使用磁罗盘有关的方位误差会对古地磁研究的最终结果产生多大影响,例如确定古地磁极的位置和古地磁变化的幅度。研究结果表明1) 古地磁变化的振幅和古地磁极的位置对与使用磁罗盘有关的古地磁样本方位的中等甚至相对较大误差的敏感性较弱;2) 样品方位的巨大误差会导致古地磁方向的遗址内散布显著增加,从而有可能发现并排除 α95 值较大(例如大于 15°)的相应遗址;3) 与使用磁罗盘有关的失真对确定古地磁极位置和古地磁变化幅度的准确性 的影响取决于纬度。在近赤道纬度,这种影响最大,而在中纬度则最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信